PREVIOUS HOUR

VKK/2a/2.00

The House met at two of the clock,

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN in the Chair.

----

THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI LAWS

(SPECIAL PROVISIONS) BILL, 2007

 

THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI S. JAIPAL REDDY): Sir, I rise to move:

That the Bill to make special provisions for the National Capital

Territory of Delhi for a further period up to 31st December, 2008 and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, as passed by Lok Sabha, be taken into consideration.

 

Sir, the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2006 was enacted and published for general information on May 19, 2006 in order to address on priority and in view of the several directions/orders passed by the Supreme Court and the High Court of Delhi in cases pending before them regarding a number of burning issues which were confronting the city of Delhi at that time, namely, unauthorised constructions, commercial use of residential premises, encroachment on public land by slum dwellers and JJ clusters, and problems relating to urban street vendors and which were affecting the lives of millions of people.

The Act, Sir, inter alia, provided the Central Government with a time period of one year to take all possible steps to finalise norms, policy guidelines and feasible strategies to deal with the problem of unauthorised development with regard to mixed land use not conforming to the Master Plan, construction beyond sanctioned plans, and encroachment by slum and JJ dwellers and hawkers and urban street vendors. (Contd. by RSS/2b)

RSS/2b/2.05

SHRI S. JAIPAL REDDY (CONTD.): It also provided for status quo as on Ist day of January, 2006 to be maintained in respect of these categories of unauthorised development, subject to certain conditions notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of the court. Similarly, it provided that all notices issued by the local bodies for initiating action against these categories of unauthorised developments shall be deemed to have been suspended and that no punitive action shall be taken during the said period of one year.

The Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2006 was effective for a period of one year and lapsed on May 18, 2007. In the intervening period, the Master Plan for Delhi 2021 was notified on 7.2.2007, incorporated extensive amendments in respect of provisions governing mixed use, and for construction beyond sanctioned plans, thus providing much-needed relief in the case of unauthorized development with regard to mixed land use not conforming to the Master Plan and to construction beyond sanctioned plans.

However, the policy guidelines and feasible strategy or scheme to deal with the problems of unauthorized development in certain categories, such as slum and JJ dwellers, urban street vendors and hawkers, farm houses, schools, dispensaries, religious institutions, cultural institutions built in rural areas on agricultural land are yet to be finalized.

Therefore, since it was felt that some more time is required for making orderly arrangements for preparing policy guidelines, feasible strategies, or schemes for these categories of unauthorized developments, the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Ordinance, 2007 was promulgated on 4.7.2007. While approving the promulgation of the Ordinance, the Government had also approved to replace the Ordinance with an Act.

Accordingly, the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Bill, 2007 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 17.8.2007. Subsequent to introduction of this Bill, certain additional provisions became necessary to be included in the Bill in view of some important developments in regard to sealing of commercial premises.

Based on recent recommendations of the Monitoring Committee, the Supreme Court has ordered that within a period of three weeks from 27.8.2007, commercial uses in unauthorized colonies shall stop functioning from the premises, except to the extent that the 24 categories which are permitted in the regular areas, shall not affect those commercial premises if they are up to 20 square metres. Similarly, based on representations received and discussions held, it was felt that storages, warehouses and godowns meant for agricultural inputs/produce (including dairy and poultry) in rural areas built on agricultural land also needed to be included in the list of unauthorized development to be protected so as to avoid any adverse impact on account of their sudden closure/sealing.

In view of these developments, it was felt that the scope of the proposed National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Bill, 2007 needs to be widened to maintain status quo in respect of unauthorized colonies as well as storages, warehouses and godowns meant for agricultural inputs/produce (including dairy and poultry) in rural areas built on agricultural land, which was approved by the Government.

However, before the aforementioned official amendments could be moved for consideration and approval, the Monsoon Session of Parliament which was scheduled up to 14th September, 2007 was adjourned sine die, and later, prorogued, and as a result, the Ordinance became liable to lapse on the expiration of six weeks from the date of the reassembly of Parliament as per the provisions of article 123 of the Constitution. (contd. by 2c)

AKG-TMV/2C/2.10

SHRI S. JAIPAL REDDY (CONTD.): In view of the exigencies explained in the preceding paras and since the Parliament was not in session, it became necessary to promulgate a second Ordinance to maintain status quo so that no punitive action is taken during this period in respect of unauthorised development as given above. The proposal was approved by the Government on 13th September, 2007.

While approving the proposal, the Government also decided that the scope of proposed Ordinance be widened to include the village abadi and its extension. This decision was taken to prevent loss and damage to people living in a large number of villages in the National Capital Territory of Delhi.

Thus, pursuant to the decision of the Government, the President was pleased to promulgate the NCT of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Ordinance, 2007 on 15th September, 2007, according to which status quo is to be maintained in respect of the following categories of unauthorised development: slum dwellers and jhuggi-jhompri clusters, hawkers and urban street vendors, unauthorised colonies, village abadi areas and its extension, existing farm houses involving construction beyond permissible building limits and schools, dispensaries, religious institutions, cultural institutions and storages, warehouses and godowns used for agricultural inputs or produce, including dairy and poultry, in rural areas built on agricultural land, with a duration up to 31st December, 2008.

The NCT of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Bill, 2007 seeks to replace the NCT of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Ordinance, 2007 by an Act of the Parliament.

The question was proposed.

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (™ߵ ֮֕֬ , פ) : ָ, ײֻ þ֟ ӡ ֮־֤ ׯ֔ ֻ ײֻ ָ ו֮֟ ֟ פ ֻ ָ֮ , ֟ ׻֋ ִֵ-ִֵ ָ ֮֯ ֋, ײֻ ֋, ֤ ױ ײֻ , ױ ٛ ֵ, ױ ײֻ ֵ ߓ ׻ֵ֟ ׿ֿ , ֯ ֮־֤ ָ ָָ ֯ ָָ ӡ , ֯ ߤ ֟ ֯ פ ֮ ֛ , וִ ָ פ ִ ֋ ִ ״ֻ ֕ ֛ ִ֮ ָߵ ֮֟ ֙ ֵ֤ פ ֻ פ֓ï פ ֕ ֲ ִֵ ֵ פ ֻ ֟ , ֟ , ֈ , ָ  ٻִֵ ִ֮ ֟ ֤ , ߱ , ֕ ָ ֻ ֲֵ , ֟


* ֕ ߅ ֵָ ֕ ָ , ֮ , ֯ protest , פ ֻ ־ֻ , ֕ ֲ ֻ ײֻ ֮ ֻ , ֯ ײֻ ָ ֓ ֟ ֮ օ ֵ֤ ֮ פ֓ï

ֳ֯ן , ֟ ֟ ֛ߋ ָָ ָ ן ߅ ִֵ Ù ֮ ִֵ ֮ , ֵօ ֲ ֛ ָ֕ , ֟ ָ Ù ֮ և ָ ֵօ ָ ֟, ִ ָ ߕ, ׻ֵ֟ ״ֻ֮ ֻ ׻ ֌ ֮ ֻ , ָ ִ ״ֻ , ָ֮ ߅ ָ Ù ֮ delay ָ ָ ӡ , ִֵ ֵ֤ Ԯ ִֻ֯ ״׮Ù , affidavit פ ָ֕ פ unauthorised construction , פ ֋ (2 ָ ֿ:)

SCH/2.15/2D

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟): ױ׾֙ פ ָ פ ֋ ָ ܟ ֵԾ ֮ ֵ֤ ֕ ֕ ֻ֟ פ * ֵ֤ ֻ֟ ֕ , ֤ ߕ , ָ ִֵ ָָ ֹ , ִֵ ָָ ֻ ֮ ֮֟ ֻև ׻֋ ֮ ױ ֮֟ פ ֻ פ֓ï ֵ֤ ֕ ֻ֟ ֟, ֕

֟ ܟ - ִֵ ָ, - ֟ , ׻֋ וִָ ִֵ ָ כ֮ , ִֵ ֛-֛ ֟ ִ þָ֕ ִֵ

__________________________________________________________

*Expunged as ordered by the Chair.
ָ ֲ ־ֻ ֲ ֟ , ִֵ ֯ , ֤ ֮֟ , Ӥ ׻֋ ӡ ֕ ָ ָ ֮ ֟ ֯ ֯ פ ֻ ָ ֟ פ ֻ ֮ ֲ פ ߱ , ָ Ϭ֮ ӡ , ׮ , ֕߾ , פ ֻ Ӹ פ ֯ ֤ פ ו ִֵ פ פ ß֮ ָ߲ ֤״ֵ ßֵ ֵ, ֻ ֕߾ Ӭ ׮ֵ Ӭ ֚ ә Ӥ ָ ֟ ֋ ֲ ךև ־֕ ָ ֤-֡ ߅ ׻֋ פ ֯ פ פ ֻ ֛ ֿ ָ ׮ ֯ ָ ֟ ֿ ֯ ֋, ׻ֵ֟ ׻֋ ֋

ָ, ֲ כ֮ , ִֵ ֲ ևә ֯ ֮ ײֻ , ָ ? , ָ ֵ ֟ ֮ ֮օ ָ, և ֮ ֛ פ פ ߅ ֌ ָ ֮ ߕ ֲ ֯ ߸ ֮ ֛ ֯ ֌ ָ ֮ ױ פ ֵ ֋ ֵ֤ ׮ֵ , ו ֌ ֮ ֤ , ױ ֯ ֛ ֯ ֮֮ ָ ֯ ֌ ִ ? ֯ ָ ֟ , פ ִֵ-ִֵ ָ Ù ֮ ֟ ָ ֜ , ֲ֤ ֜ , ֟ ֮ ֮֮ פ ָ և ִ߮ , ֮ ֮֋ ֋ ֤ ֕ פ ãן ֋ ? פ Ӥ ֤ ?

ֳ֯ן , ן׮׬ ֕ ֳ, ֳ וûי ֻ, ֮֟ ן׮׬ֵ ֈ ָ ֟ , ֟ ֮֕ , ׮ï֟ ׌ ֻ , פ ֕ ָ ָ ָ ߕ ֕ ֮ 500 ֻ פ, ӓ פ Ӥ ֮ , ֟ ֮֮ ׻֋ ײֻ ָ ӡ ֺ , ֣ , ֳ֯ן , ӲӬ ֯ Ӹ ֯ ֮ٛ , ו ײֻ , ֮ וִָ ו֮ ֮, , ו֮ ֟ , ֮ ָ פ֓ï, ָ פ ֣ , ו֮ ֮ ֮ ו֮ ָ ֻ־ָ ֙

ָ, ֯ ß ָ ׮ֻ, ֻ , ֺ ֟ ײ֮ Ϭ֮ ӡ ֮ ֻ ӟָ֕ ָ ײֻ ָ օ ܟֵָ ָ ײֻ ׻֋ פ և 2E/HMS ָ ָ

2E/HMS-RG/2.20

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟) : ָ, Ù ֮ օ Ù ֮ ִֵ ֮ , ֯ Ù ֮ Ӥ ֻ , ֟ ֮ ߅ Ù ֮ ֛ , 20 ֻ future document 000 ֮֟ ֲ פ ֟ ֤ פ ֻ objection ׻֋ ֟ ꌿ֮ ֻ֟ ߕ ֟֋ ָ֕ ָ, 000 , ꌙ , 000 ֵָ֕ , וûי  ׸ϕי , ֟ , ו ָ ֻ ֕ ֻ , ָ ײֻ ֮ ָ ܟ ָ֕ ָ, ֛ ֲ ϵ ֻ ֻ , ֮ ֺ ׌, ו ו ָ ֤ , ָ ֻ ָ ָ ׌ ָ ֻ , ״֙ , ָ , , ֮ , ִ ֈ ߻ , ïߙ ߻ , כïָߕ ߻ who you are? ױ ֻ օ ָ, ֮ ? ֮ ֲ ֮ Ӥ ֮ ֮ ߻ ָ, ֟ ֤ ֟ , ֻ ָߤ , ֻ ֟ , ױ ָ ֟ ֲ ֮ ֻ֟ ֮ ֻ֟ ? ָָ ֮ ָ , , ܾ֮ ״ֻ ֟ ִ ֻ ֤ ֮ -߮ ֟ ֲ ֮֟ , ֮ ֓ ָ ֮ ߾-֓ -֯ ׻֋ ֺ ֯ -- ß ֺ ׮ֻ ֟ , ֕ ֯ ֻ ׯ֔ ָ ֯ ֳָֻ ׻֋ , ֯ פ ? ֮ פ ֮֮ ׻֋ ֬ , ֮ ׻֋ ֺ ֯ ֮ ָ ֌ ֛ וû ֛ , ֛ , כֵָ ֛ , ֤ ֛ ֤ ֛ , ֺ ִֵ ֵ ֲ ֮ٛ ߓ , פ ֮ ֯ ִ , ֮ ܵ ִ Ù ֮ פ ֮ ִ , ָָ ִ ִ ֯ ֯ ֺ ֲ֕ ֲ֕ ֤ ֵ

ָ, ֣ ׮֙ظ ֮ ו ָ ו օ ֯ ֋, ׮֙ظ פ ֻ֟ ߅ 0000 ָ , פ ֻ֯ ֮ ָ , פ ֻ ָ ߅ 5 ֤ ֵ פ 5 ֤ פ ֮ օ ָ, ָ ? ו֮ פ ָ ֻ , ו֮ פ ִ ׻ֵ, participate , ֵ ֻ, ־ - ֮ ו֮ ָ כ֮ ָ ־ פ ָ, ֮ ֟ ֵָ֕ ֮ ֯ ֮ ֵ ֯ , , ָ, և ָ ֟ ֮ ָ, י ֮ כ ֮ פ? ָ ? ־ ״ֻ ֋? ֮ ֟, Ӥ ֮ ֻ֟ ֮ , ָָ ֻ֟ ֮ , ֯ , ־, ֻ ֻ ֮ פ ֋ ָ, ߙظ ָ ֮ ֓ ? ָ, Ӥ ֤ ܾ֮ 5 ָ ֋ , ׻֋ ֛ ױ ֮ פ ֵ , - ֋ ֓

(2 /֕ ָ ֿ:)

2F/KLG-KS/2.25

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ ) : ? ֋? ָָ ? ֯ ظ ֮֮ ֻ ? ו ֕ ֋, ֻ ָ ִ ָ֕ ֻ ֋, פ ָ ֙ , ֛ ָ ֮ ֋ ֿ ӡ ֯ - ֟ , ֯ ֮ ֛ ״׮Ù , ״׮Ù ֮ ָ ? פ ֯ , ָ ֯ ֻ , ִ ֻ ?

, פ ָָ ֮־֤ , ָ ִֵ ָ֮֯ , ָ ֛ ָָ , ו֮ ߱ և, ִֵ-ִֵ ָ ׻֋ ֋ ֮֯ ֛ יև , ֮֯ ׿ֿ ״ֻ, ֮֯ ָև , ֻ ֱֻ , ֲ ֯ ־ֻ , ֮֮ פ ֮ ׻ֵ ֋ ֻ׮ֵ ֯ ָև ֯ ִ ֓ , ֓ , ָָ ָ ֓ ָ, פ ֮֮ ֯ פ פ ֯ ꌙ ׻֋ , ֯ , ָ ֯ ו֮ ֋, י և ָ ֮֮ օ ֯ ָ ֯ ׸ , ֮֯ , ׻֋ ֯ ֮־֤ ׸ֻ֮ ֕ ֋ , ֮֯ 20 ָ פ, ױ פ ֻ ָ߲ , פ ֻ ߸ , ׻֋ ֿ ֯ ָ ָ , פ ָ߲ ֯ ׮ ֯ , ײֻ ֱ ל ֟ ߅ ֯ ָ ܾß ֯ ָ ֮ ֺ ֮

, ֤ ֮֯ ֛ יև , ֮օ ֟ ֮ ֻֻ ֮ ֛ ָ ֮ , ֮ ָ , ו֛׮ֵֻ ׸ , ֮ ֮ ֛-֛ Ӳ , ֈ ֮֙, , ֤ ָ֕, Ӥ , ֿ- ֙ ֮, ֮ ֛ , ֕ ֻ ָ ß֮ ֟ ׮ֵ ֟ , ֻ ָ Ӥ ֋, ָ ״ֻ ֲ ß ִ ֲ ָ ߕ ״ֻ߅ ֯ ֕ Ӥ ? ָ פ ֤ ָ֕ ׿ְ פ ֋ ֯ ֻ , ֮֯ ֲָ ֜ օ , ֕ Ӥ ? ָ ߓ ٿֵֻ , ֻ , כ , ֻ ָ ֛ ָ֯ ͅ ֈ ֮֙ ֯ ו ֻ ֻ ֋, ֮ ָ, ֯ ן , ֻ ֱָ Ù ֺ ֋ , ֲ ֮ Ӥ ֮ ִ֮ ִ֮ Ӆ ֲֻ פ ֮ Ӥ ֯ ָ ֋, ֯ ײֻ֕ ֮ , ӯִֵֻ ֮ ֛ ָ ֮ ֮ ֋, ָ ֮ ֋߅ ָ ܟ ָ֕ ֿ ֯ ֮ ֯ , ו֮ ֮ ָ ֛ և ֮ ӲӬ ׻֙ ֮ ֮֟ , ֮ ӲӬ ֤ 50 ߙ ֻ ֮ ִ֮ ָߤ ֋? ֿ ֲ ãן , ָ ֯ ӡֵֻ ֮

, ֯ ײֻ , ָ ֮ , ו֮ ߻ פ ֵ ? ãן , ו֮ ֮ ߻ ֮ ߻ ? ײֻ ֮֯ פ status quo օ status quo ߻ , ߻ ֮ ֻ߅ ֮֯ status quo ֮ , ױ ו֮ ֮ Ӥ Ӥ ו֮ ߅ ֮֮  ו֮ ֮ ߻ , ֻ֟ , , ֮ ֻ ִ ׻֋ ײֻ ֣ ֯ ֋ ֮֯ , ֮ ֺ ֮ ֳ פ ֻ ״ֻ, ָ ״ֻ߅

2/ ָ ֿ:


aka-tdb/2g/2:30

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟) : ֣-֣ ֮ ָ ֕ ֵ פ ֋ 15 ߙ ָ ֮ ֮֯ , unauthorised colonies regularise օ 1400, 1500 unauthorised colonies regularise ֮֕ן , ꮵㆮ 1500 ׮ֵ ֻ ֛ օ ֮֯ ֱ ָ , ׻ ֮ ֯ ָ ֵ ֻ Ùכִ ֯ ִ֮ , ׻֋ ֯ ֻ ֻ regularise , ֮֟ ״ֻ ֵ-ֵָ ֮֟ Ù ֋, ׮ֵ Ӭ וֲ֤֮, ִ֮ וֲ֤֮, ֵֻ֯ וֲ֤֮ ָ ֋, ֲ ״ֻ߅ ֿ , formalities ֯ ֻ , ֟ ׻֮ ״ֻ ֵ ָ, ..(־֮֬).

ק : ָ ֋, ״ֻ?

شری شاہد صدیقی : جو نعرہ نہیں لگائیں گے، انہیں راحت نہیں ملے گی؟

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : , ֳ ָ ־֋, ׻֋ ֛ օ

ק : ׻֋ וִָ , ..(־֮֬)..

شری شاہد صدیقی : جو توڑنے کے لئے ذمہ دار تھے، ان کا ۔۔مداخلت۔۔

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ִ֮ , ֕ ֋ וִָ , ִ ֕ ָ

֮ ֻ ӛ : ק ׸ϕי

ֳ֯ : ֯

ק : , ֯ , פ ֻ , ׸ϕי

شری شاہد صدیقی : ہم تو ان کے بھی ہیں، آپ کے بھی ہیں، دہلی میں رہنے والا جو بھی ہے، ہم ان کے ریپریزینٹیٹو ہیں۔

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ֵֻ֯ , ָ ִ ֻ , ֻ׮ֵ regularies ׻֮ ״ֻ ֤ ײֻ֕, ֮, ֛, ߾ָ פ, ׾֬֋ civic amenities כïָߕ , ָ ߕ Ӥ ״ֻ ֻ , 1500 ׮ֵ ִֻ֯ ׻֋ ־֮Դ ָ פ ָָ , ִ ִ ֋, ֯ ִ ִ ֋, ߛߋ ִ ִ ֋ ׾֬֋ , Ӥ֕ ְ ֺ ֟ 1500 ׮ֵ , ׯ֔ 15 ֻ ֟ ָ-ָ ֟ ׮ֵ , ֕ , ָָ ߮ ֻ , ֯ ֕ ָ ײֻ ֱ ָ ֮ פ ָ ׻֮ ״ֻ ֋ ָ ִ ִ ֋ - ֛, ߾ָ civic amenities ִ

֤ -֛ ֻ ׻֋ ֛ ߴ פ ָָ , ׻֋ ־ , י և , ֮ ׻֋ ֛ ֙ ֮֋ ֋ , ו֮ ֙ ߮ ߴ֟ ׮ֵ Ӭ օ פ ֤ -֛ ֯ ֵ֤ ֮֯ ֮ ֮ , פ , ֿ ׻֋ ϲӬ , ߴ ֻ ֻ ߅ ִ humane , ׮ ָ ֋Ӆ ׸ָ , ֯ - ָ , ֮ ߾ ֓ ֣ ִָ Ӆ

ָ ֙ ֻ ָ ֮֯ ִ ֵ ֋, ֯ ִ ֮ ֮ פ ׯ֔ ֻ ֙ ֻ ֵ֤ ֯ ֮ , Ӥ ֮֯ ָ פ ֕ -֮ ֯ ָ ִ߮ ֛ , ֯ כ , ָ-ָ Ӥ ָ ֋, ֕֋ ֮ ֯ , ָ߲ ֤״ֵ ֮


ָ߲ ֤ , ß֮ ֻ , ֋, ָ ֯ ֮ ? ֲ ָָ ֟ ߤ ֲ ֤ ָ߲ ֤ ֟ ָָ և, ״ֻ, ױ ָ ָ ֟ ֣ ׮ָֿ ߅ ֕ ֌ , ֮֯ ֛ ֻ JJ Cluster , ָ ֻ ߤ ֯ ֯ ׻֋ ֻ

֤ 15 ߙ ָ ֮ , ׻֋ և ִõ ֛ և ߟ ֯ , ֛ ׿ ִ 15 ߙ ָ ֮ , ָև ! ֲ ֯ ָ֮ amnesty , ֲ ֯ ָ֮ ߕ ] Ӥ 15 ߙ, 17 ߙ, 20 ߙ ֵ֮ ֟օ (2h/nb' ָ ָ)

NB/2H/2.35

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟) : ֿ ֲӤ ֯ ֋ affidavit 15 ߙ ֵ֮ ֟օ ֯ ֌ ֮ ֮ ߱ , ו ֕ ָ ָ֮ ֯ ֵ ֵ֤ ֮և, ׮ֵ ׮ և , ֯ ֲָ ו֋ ֌ ֺ , ָ ״׮ִִ ևԕ , ָ ֛ ֮֟ , ߲֟ ֋? ֯ minimum requirement ֟ building by-laws simplify , ֲ ִ օ

֯ ֈ ׻֋ ׮֙ ׸ ֻ ֋, ֕ ָ ֯ ָ , ֻֻ Ӥ ֿ 15 ߙ ֻ ֲӤ ֮֯ , ֮ ֮ ߅

֤ ־ֻ ֟ ֯ פ ֮ ֮֯ ֮ ײֻ ֱ ߮ ֟ ׻֋ , ֯ פ ֮߅ Advisory Committee ָ , ֛ ß , ֛ buildings ֮ ߅ ֯ ׮ֵ ֻ և, - ו̻ buildings ֮ , פ ֮ ? ָ vision , ֻ ׮ֵ , ӛ֮-׮ָ ? ָ פ , ׮ֵ ֌ ָ פ ִ , ָ-ָ ֲ ל פ ֮ , vision ָ? ֕ ֱ ָӳ ָ 20-25 ו̻ building ֮֮ ֛ ִָ֤ ֋ , ֟ ֮֮ ׻֋ ָ ׮ֵ 30 ֻ և, ֕ ֋ ָ֤ ָָ , ָ , ֵ֤ ֮ ֻ ֟߅ ֕߾ Ӭ ֮֯ , ׻֋ և, ߓ פ ֵ օ

ָ ֕ ׮ֵ ֛-֛ ֯ ֋, ֋, 5 ߙ ߔ ֋ ֻ֯ ֕ ׮ֵ ֟ ֯ ֯ ֻ ֋, ֯ ֻ׿ֵ ֻ ֋, ֯ ߮ ֻ ֋, ֯ ؕ ֻ ֋, ֯ ӑև ֻ ֋, ֯ ֋ ֋ ֟ vision ֯ ָ , ֯ , , ֋ ׮ֵ - buildings ֮ ֟ ֟ ֮ ֮ פօ ֿ ֯ ֺ (ִֵ ә)

ֳ֯ן , ו֋, ֕ ִ֮ ֻ

ֳ֯ : ָ ֮ ֋

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ֮ פ , ָ פ , ָ ֯ ֺ ֤ß , ֕ ӓ-ӓ, ֟-֟ ߜ ֻ֟-ֻ֟ ׻ֵ, ֮ , -̴ ߲, ֲ , ֋ building by-laws suit օ 100 ָ ָ ֮ ֮ , ָ ׸և ߓ ֮ ֣ ָ֕ , ֤ ֕ ָ-ָ ָ ֻ־ָ ֙և ֟ , ָ י ֟ , ״ י ֟ ׮־ ׻֋ ֯ ֮ , ֻ ָ elected ֤ ָ Ӥ Ӥ , Ӥ ֲֻ֟ Ӥ ֛ , Ӥ ֲֻ֟ ָ߾ָ Ӥ ָ 5-6 - פ , ߸ , , ֮ , ִ - ߓ פ , Ӥ ָ vision ָ , ֮ ָ ֮? ָ 100-125 ֻ ֮ ֮ , ָ ֮֋, ָ ָ ֮֟ unauthorised ֮֟ , ָ unauthorised ֮֟ , ָ ֲ ֻ־ָ ֙ ֿ ָ ֯ ֮ , ֮ , ׻֋ ASI ֲ ֯ , ß ׮֮ ״ֻ ָ֮ 2J/VNK ָ ֿ:

-NB/VNK-KLS/2J/2.40

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟) : ִ ֈ ָ ֮֯ ׻ ׻ֵ ֿ ִ ֈ ֮ ֋, ֮ ֋, ָ פ ָ ֣ , ֲ߻ ִ ֈ ֌ ֮ , ִ ֈ ׻ ߕ , ָ ֯ ֮, ֮֯ פ, ֲ ֮, ֕ ֻ , פ ßֻ , 15 30 ߙ, ֮ ֛ , ֤ ßֻ , ִ ֲӤ ֋, ִ ֈ ָ ֟ , ֌ ֺ ִ ֈ ִ߮ Ù֮ ֮ ïߙ ֮ ֕֟ ״ֻ֮ , ֕ ֺ ֯ פ Ù֮ ֮ ׻֋ ֵ֤ ֓ ֋ ֲ ִ߮ , ֓ ֋ ֲ ִ߮ פ , ֮ ֮ ֋, ױ ֛-֛ ֻ ָ , ֵָָ , ֋ ָ ևָ ׿ ׻֋ ӓ ָ ֋ ߮ ֛ ָ ֵ ߮ ֛ ..(־֮֬)..

ק : ָ,

شری شاہد صدیقی : سر لاکھوں میں فیس ہے۔

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : , ֯ ֮ ִ߮ ֓ ֲ , ֟ , ו֮ ֮ ִ߮ , ִ߮ ֤֮ ׻֋, ޛ ׻֋ ֯ ׸ֵ֟ ָ֮ ׸ֵ֟ , ָ ָ ֳ ׸ֵ֟ ӕ , ָ ߅

ָ, ֕ פ Ù ֈ , ߲֟ , ֛-֛ , - ߮ , ӓ ֋ ָ , ֟ ֟ , ִԿֻ֋ ָ , ֿ ׻֋ , ֮֯ ֮ ׯ֔ , ָ ן ֮֋ Ù ֈ ֛ӕ , ֲ , ֮ ֋ , Ɵ , ֻ֯ , ޛ ֤ , ָև , ֯ և , ֮ ?

ֳ֯ : Ͼֻ , ֯ ֙ ֮ ֻ

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ָ, ֤ , - ֵ ״֌Û ޛ , וִ ֻ֮ , ߻ , , ָ ״ֻ, 25 ָ ָ ִ ָև , - ֻ , ߻ ֻ֋, ֻ֋, ֲ ֯ consultant , ָ ֻ֮ , Ӥ ֋, ֋, Ӥ ֮ ֲӤ ״֌Û ޛ ׸ Ӥ ֯ , ֮ , ֻ֮ - ָ , ׾֬ , ֯ ֕ ֮֯ ִ ֟ , ִ ָ ֯ ׻֋ ֋ ֌ , Ӥ ִ ֯ allow , compounding fee ֯ ִ allow ִ ֲ ִõ ֋, ֕ ָ ִ֮ ֛ ִõ ֿ ָ ֯ ֮ ֺ ֋օ

׮ ִ ָ ֵ֤ ϳ , ִ ֕ ֜ וִ ֮֯ ׻ ִ ֛-֛ ֤ , פ - ֻ ֛-֛ ֤ ָ, ֕ ִ֮ , ֯ ֻ֟ ו֋, ֮ ֻ׮ֵ , , ֮ ֻ׮ֵ , , ָ פ ִ߮ ִ ֜ ֜, ָ߲ ֤ ߲֮ ֓ ָ ֯ ִ ִ ָև ֱ ֵ ֿ ֲ ֯ ֮ ߕ ֻ identify ֻ ׻֋ , ֿ ֯ ִ ֤ ָ, ָ ֈ ָ ևә ו֮ ֮ , ֛-֛ ïֻ֟ , , ָ ֈ , ָ ֻ , ֮ ֻ ('2k/mp' ָ ָ)

MP/2K/2.45

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟) : - ֻ , ֯ ̴߮ ֯ ̴߮ , ֯ warehouses ֮ , ֕ ߓ , outskirts ָ ֯ ݵָև , ָ֯ ֻ֟ ߱ ߕ ֮ և , ׻֋ ִ ִ֮ ָ , ִ ֈ, ï֙, , ֯ ֯ ׻֋.... ֿ ....(־֮֬)...

ק : ָ ׻֋ ?

شری شاہد صدیقی : وہ کچھہ ہمارے لئے چھوڑیں گے بھی؟

 


ֳ֯ : פ ֻ

ק : פ ֻ

شری شاہد صدیقی : ہم دل والے ہیں۔

ֳ֯ : ֯ פ ֻ , פ ֻ

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ֯ ֮־֤ ֯ ײֻ ֋ ֿ ֟ ֯ , ָ ̲֕ ִ , , ֻ ֯ ױ׾֙ , ֵ ߕ ֈ , ߴ , ֮֟ ־֕ ָ compromise ֯ , ֮֮

(ִ֯)

֮ ֤ (ָ Ϥ) : ֳ֯ן , פ ™ߵ ֮֕֬ ֕ ׾׬ (׾ֿ ֲӬ) ׾֬, 2007, ӡ ֋ , ָ ֮ ׻֋ ֛ ֮֯ ֤ߵ Ͼֻ פ ֻ פ ָ ִõֆ ָ ׾ßָ ֮ ֟ ֮ ִ פ ֻ ֙ ִ֕־֤ ֙ ָ ֤ߵ ק ֲ ֯ ֮ ָ , פ ִõ֋ , ו֮ ׻֋ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׾֬ ֋ , ָ ֮ ֟ ֮ ִ , ָ Ϥ ֻ פ ֮֕֬ פ , ֕ ֆ ֮ ֻ , פ ׮־ ׌֟ ָ֮ פ ָ Ϥ, ײָ, ֻ, , ִִ ֕ , ָ ܵ פ , - ָ ֙׸ ָ ־ֵ ִ פ ֤֕ ӛ , ֟ ָ Ϥ ֟-֚ ָ ֤ ֤֕ ӛ ָֻ ִ ָ ܵ ָ Ϥ, ײָ, ו֮ ִ ׻ֵ, -ָ ׻֋ ֋ פ ־ ִõ ִִ ָָ ̴߮ ָ ׯ֔ ן , ֮ ׻֋ -כ ֮ , ִ ָָ, ָָ , ֤ߵ Ͼֻ Ù ֮ ֟ , ֤֕ ֤ ו֮֟ ָָ և, פ , ָ ֮ ֻ פ ָ , ִ פ ָ ֮ ָ ָ ֋, Ù ֮ ? Ù ֮ ֮ ֺ, ֮ ӓ ֻ ׻֋ ֮, ֻ ׻֋ ֮, ֻ ׻֋ ֮, ֯ ִ֬ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׮־ ֯ , ׾µ ֮ ֻ ֓- פ þֺ ....

(2L/SC ָ ֿ:)

SC/2.50/2L

֮ ֤ (֟) : ָ ֮ ֮֮ ִ ֳ֯ן , פ ָ ֜օ ִִ ֋ ֻ פ , ָ ָ֮ , 㴲և ֟ - ו֮֟ ָ֮ , ִ ָ ָ ֋ ָ ϴ ִõ , ו ֋ ֕ Ӿ , ò , ָ , ָ ֜ ֵ ִ ָ֮ ָ Ӿ ֵֻ֮ ֲ ָ ׻֋ ֛ ־ ִõ ֮ ֯ ֛ ָ ך ִ ־ ֳ֯ן , ֤֕ ֤ ִ ֮ ִ օ ֮ ִ߮ , ִ߮ כ ־ ִ ֮ ִ օ ֕ ֲ ֮ܵ ־ ֜, ֲ ָ פ ֋, ָ֮ ֋ ־ ִõ ֜ ָ ִõ֋ ֜ ֕ ָ֮ ֮ ִ , ֯ Ӥ ִ ָ ֋ , ִ , ָ ָ ָ ֣ ֜ ֳ֯ן , ֮֮ߵ Ͼֻ ߮ ֮֮ߵ ׮ֵ Ӭ -ӯ֛ ֻ ׻֋ Ù ֮ ִ օ , ־ ָָ ָ ֻ ִ -כ ֻ , Ӥ ßֵ ֻ , ָ ֻ ֮ ָ ֵ -ӯ֛ ֻ , ֤ؕ ֮ ™ֵ ֟ ߅ ִִ þã ָ֟ , ֲ ־ , ֲ Ù ֮ ִ ֵ ֻ ֮ ֟ פ ָָ ߛߋ ֕ -֛ ֻ ߅

ֳ֬ (0 ..׸֮) ߚ߮

֮֮ߵ ֳ֬ , 1500 ֻ׮ֵ, ֆ֣և ֮ ֵ , ׮ֵ״֟ ִ ׮ֵ״֟ פ ׌֟ ָ֮ , ָ, ֕ ֌ , ָ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֮ פ֮ ֳ֬ , ׯ֔ ִֵ ָ ֌ ֵ֟ ִִ ֮ ָ ߻ ֵ, ֳ ָ ֮ ָ ߻ ֮ ִ օ ֵ ֻ ߲ ߻ ֮ ָ ֮ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׾֬ ֋ , ו֮ ֮ ָ ߻ ֵ , ו֮ ָָ Ӥ ֋ , ו֮ - ה ֵ , : ֮ ִ ? ָ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֮֮ פ ִָ֓ ֡ ֵ פ ӓ־ ו̻ ֮ , ָ פ ֋ - ֮֮ߵ և ӲӬ ֤ ׸ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׮־ ָ ֵ ׮ֻ ׮ִ ֋ , ֵָ ֋ (2-ߋ ָ ֟)

-nbr-usy-mcm/2m/2.55

֮ ֤ (֟) : ֛ ֟ - ֵ ׌ ֮ ֮֟ , ãן ֮ ӓ־ וֻ , ָև ֋ , ׮־ ֯ פ ָ֮ ֻ-ֻ ֯ ָ , Ӿ , ꋛ ꋛ , ִ ֮ ִ߮ , ָ ߬ ײֻ ִ ָ ײֻ ָ , ӓ ָߤ ִ ֮־ ߮ ֮ ִ Ͼע Ӿ ꋛ ꋛ և ֯ ִ֬ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׮־ ָ ֮ ִ , ײֻ ֣ ֮ ֮ ֮֜ ִ ߮ , ִ ֤ ִ֬ ׸ָ ׌ ָߤ ָ ֮ ִ߮ ִ ִ ָ ָߤ ָ ֮־ ִ ָ ֮ ִ

, ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׮־ ֮ ߻ և , ־֮ ִ ֻߕ ו֮ ׮ֵ״֟ ִ , ֌ פ ָ ָ׮ֵ , ִ -֛ ֻ , ֟ ֤֕ ִ , פ ߮ פ ִ֮ ִ , ו֮֟ ֲ ִõ ֳ ־ , ו֮֟ ִ־ , ϵ ִ Ӆ - ֮־֤

(ִ֯)

SHRI A. VIJAYARAGHAVAN (KERALA): Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, I am here to support this Bill, which is intended to stop all the ceilings in Delhi till December, 2008. We are all aware that there have been problems in the National Capital Territory of Delhi at regular intervals. And, there has been unrest among the people owing to illegal constructions, evictions, police actions, and related issues. Therefore, the Government has a responsibility to create an order, which would stop this kind of actions and which would provide sufficient facilities to the people of Delhi.

Recently, I saw a news items of Mumbai, in which it was mentioned that the price of one square feet land, in Mumbai, was rupees five lakh. So, the price of land, in cities, is growing at an exorbitant rate. In the beginning itself it was mentioned that there was phenomenal increase in the population of the National Capital Territory of Delhi owing to migration and other factors, resulting in tremendous pressure on land and infrastructure, leading to encroachment and unauthorised developments, which are not in consonance with the concept of planned developed development. It was mentioned in the Master Plan of 2001. So, while addressing the question, we will have to tackle the other reasons which will be creating problem in Delhi. The first one is, migration from the villages. My colleagues have already expressed their viewpoint in this regard. It is a fact that millions of farmers are losing their land for livelihood. It was reported, between 1991 and 2001, that....(Interruptions) (Followed by 2n - VP)

 PREVIOUS HOUR