SHRI PRANAB MUKHERJEE (CONTD.): The 123
Agreement is the product. There have been different stages. I don't say that
you will be convinced by this argument; I have used this argument on earlier
occasions also. But that does not mean that my argument is nullified, unless it
is proven who is correct and who is not correct. The taste of the pudding is in
its eating. I would like to submit most respectfully that I am repeating what I
had said earlier. We are not bound by the Hyde Act. We are bound by the 123
Agreement, which is a bilateral agreement between
MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Now, the hon. Leader of Opposition wishes to seek a clarification.
THE LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION (SHRI JASWANT SINGH): Mr. Chairman, Sir, it is not my intention at all to reopen or resume the debate that we have had since yesterday. I am very grateful to the hon. The Minister of External Affairs for the very valiant effort that he has made to covering the field in very general terms. I had some specific queries to ask, if only the Prime Minister would do us the courtesy of waiting while I ask clarifications. (Interruptions)
SHRI PRANAB MUKHERJEE: I am just informing you. He has a lunch commitment with the former Singapore Prime Minister, Lee Kuan. It is already time and, therefore, he had to rush.
SHRI JASWANT SINGH: I fully understand, Sir. I am grateful to the hon. Minister of External Affairs to have said this to us. But had the Prime Minister himself got up and said that he has a lunch to go to, the House would not have said, "No, you can't". These are the things... (Interruptions) (Followed by 2m/hk)
SHRI JASWANT SINGH (CONTD.): Because the debate concerns the hon. Prime Minister. This kind of taking the House for granted or offhandedly has intrigued and disappointed us earlier and continues to disappoint us. ..(Interruptions)..
MR. CHAIRMAN: Please, go ahead, Sir. (Interruptions)
SHRI JASWANT SINGH: Sir, his continued silence other than yesterday..(Interruptions)
MR. CHAIRMAN: Please. ...(Interruptions)..
JASWANT SINGH: Sir, as the hon. Minister for External Affairs said, we
should not score debating points. I
quite agree because the subject is far too important to simply sink to a level
of debating points. But there is a very
fine verse from the Ramacharita Manas, ¯Ö¸ü ˆ¯Ö¤êü¿Ö Ûãú¿Ö»Ö ²ÖÆãüŸÖê¸êü, •Öê †Ö“Ö¸üØÆü ŸÖê
®Ö¸ü ®Ö ‘Ö®Öê¸êü… Here, I may remind the hon. Minister for
External Affairs that he has reinvented the reality of
MR. CHAIRMAN: Please, please. Silence please. ...(Interruptions)..
SHRI JASWANT SINGH: The hon. External Affairs Minister spoke of the then Defence Minister, Mr. Venkataraman. He has written in his biography that the nuclear test was planned. Indeed, he was ready to go down into the borehole to test the entire machinery, etc. Let us not forget that he was the Defence Minister and the party which hon. Pranab Babu has served so admirably and with such great distinction for so many years. Sir, I don't want to pursue it further. The hon. Prime Minister and everybody in the Treasury Benches have said, indeed my senior colleague in the other House, Mr. Advani, has said, that it is important that we take the sense of the House on such an important issue. He himself cited WTO. Don't be in a hurry. I appeal to the Government, wait a bit, convince the House, carry the people and Parliament with you and if you have to have the sense of the House, it is clear since yesterday's debate that a very large part of the House, which may constitute the majority, is not with you and is not convinced. Do make an effort again. What is the hurry to go now to a Republican Government? If you are lauding a bi-partisan support there, why don't you work for a bi-partisan support here? That is the answer. I would be very grateful, Sir, if the hon. Minister would give us a reply to that because I don't see that bi-partisan support just now.
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Sir. I compliment the External Affairs
Minister for the valiant effort that he has made. But I must confess that he has left me not
fully convinced. So, my opposition to
the deal continues. And, I would like to
only remind, and only like to remind, Sir, remember, there was a reference
yesterday to the visit of former US President Bill Clinton to India and also a
reference to the fact that he had arm twisted, that is, US Administration then,
arm-twisted more than 30 countries into signing the CTBT, which even we were
prepared, India, at that point of time.
Well, it did not happen mercifully.
That is good. But, nevertheless,
when Bill Clinton went back to the
(Contd. by 2n-KSK)
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY (CONTD): So, this is our appeal to the Government.
SHRI AMAR SINGH (UTTAR PRADESH): Sir, I associate myself with comrade Yechury.
SHRI SHAHID SIDDIQUI: Sir, I need a specific clarification...
MR. CHAIRMAN: Please, do not interfere...(Interruptions). Mr. Siddiqui, you don't have the floor...(Interruptions). Will you please resume your place?...(Interruptions). This is not the subject under discussion.
PRANAB MUKHERJEE: Sir, first of all, I
would like to respond to the common points which the Leader of the Opposition
and Mr. Yechury have made and Shri
Amar Singh has also associated himself with Mr. Yechury about the sense of the House and give values to the
democracy. Before that, I would like to
make one point. I have no intention of
joining the controversy, because the period which he has referred, I have great
respect for former President, former Defence Minister, Mr. Venkataraman, who was my
colleague. I worked with him during
1970s. When he was the Member of the Planning
Commission, I was Minister here. In
fact, I replaced him as the Finance Minister when he went to Defence. Please, remember, he was the Defence Minister
from 1982 to 1984 till he was elected the Vice-President. The Prime Minister of the country was Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Am I
to believe that Mrs. Indira Gandhi, under the
pressure of the
MR. CHAIRMAN: Order, please...(Interruptions).
SHRI PRANAB MUKHERJEE: What Mr. Yechury told...(Interruptions)...it is most unfortunate...(Interruptions).
MR. CHAIRMAN: Hon. Members are requested to resume their places...(Interruptions).
SHRI JASWANT SINGH: Sir, we are walking out.
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Sir, we are also walking out.
SHRI AMAR SINGH: Sir, we are walking out.
(At this stage, some hon. Members left the Chamber)
SHRI PRANAB MUKHERJEE: It is most unfortunate that they are running out. If it happened, it happened in the case of CTBT. It is not for the first time that American Senate rejected the proposal of the President. If it rejects the proposal, 123 Agreement, on which I will take the sense of the House, you please tell me, on which I will take the sense of the House, because the Bill does not come. The Bill does not come to exist....(Interruptions). Why are these people making noise? What type of people they are? Therefore, there is no reason. They have no case. They have left. It is for them to decide. Thank you, Sir. (Ends)
MR. CHAIRMAN: The discussion on this subject is now concluded. Now, we go to the next item.
THE JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POST-GRADUATE MEDICAL
EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, PUDUCHERRY BILL, 2007
THE MINISTER OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (DR. ANBUMANI RAMDOSS): Sir, I beg to move:
That the Bill to declare the institution known as the Jawaharlal Institute of Post-graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, to be an institution of national importance and to provide for its incorporation and matters connected therewith, to be taken into consideration.
The question was proposed
MR. CHAIRMAN: Any Member desiring to speak may do so. Mr. Narayanasamy.
SHRI S.S. AHLUWALIA: Sir, Mr. Apte is here.
MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes, Shri Balwant Apte.
THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (SHRI SURESH PACHOURI): Sir, Members are not present.
MR. CHAIRMAN: No, one Member is present. (followed by 2o - sk)
SHRI BALAVANT ALIAS BAL APTE: Sir, I am very much here. I thought that my name would be called out and, therefore, I waited. It was not free for all. Or, was it?
MR. CHAIRMAN: Please, go ahead.
BALAVANT ALIAS BAL APTE (
(THE VICE-CHAIRMAN, PROF. P.J. KURIEN, in the Chair)
The establishment of the institutes also had the same fate. But now, probably the Government has woken up to the need for establishment of such institutes, and, therefore, has sought. ...(Interruptions).. Sir, in an empty House, I must, at least, have your attention.
The establishment of this institute, which was already there since 1964 as a statutory body, under the aegis of the Central Government, maybe with assured financial support, is sought by this Bill. Insofar as incorporation of this institute and its governance is concerned, the objects talk about academic autonomy and then the proposal shows that the autonomy which is termed to be academic will be illusory if the present structure is permitted to be hold. Sir, autonomy is not something which can be confined to determination of courses, particularly, in a medical institute where you train doctors and you render simultaneously excellent medical service to the people at large, particularly, to the have-nots. (Contd. by 2P-YSR)
SHRI BALAVANT ALIAS BAL
APTE (CONTD.): Therefore, talking
of academic autonomy is hollow if the institution is not fully autonomous. If you treat the full autonomy of an
institute of medical education in a manner in which it ought not
have to be done, every institute in the country will suffer the same tragedy as
the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in
Sir, the institutes cannot depend upon the whims and fancies of the powers that be, particularly the Health Minister. They are not run by the persons whom he likes; and the persons whom he dislikes should not be removed.
This Bill guarantees one more empire to the Minister for Health to deal casually with personnel, to deal casually with dignified people, and to deal casually with persons who have medical excellence but who are poor in subserving him.
in the All India Institute of Medical Sciences by the Health Minister is a
pointer to which this Government will tend to go, will stoop to go, to hamper
both autonomy and service. I, therefore,
believe that the present institute will also suffer the same tragedy as the
Sir, I had the privilege of reading the report of the Committee on this headed by Shri Amar Singh. It has also pointed out that this autonomy is very important. They, in fact, recommended in this Bill that the Minister should not be a Member of the Institute and should not be an ex officio President. The Bill provided this. Fortunately, some wisdom has dawned and they have removed the inclusion of the Minister. But the Secretary is very much there.
Therefore, Sir, my first submission before you is that the concept of autonomy is not merely determining courses; the concept of autonomy includes the administration of the institution, particularly because it is at the same time a teaching institution as well as an institution for public service. This autonomy has to be ensured. After the Report of the Standing Committee, the amendments, which are sought to be made here, are, in a way, very cosmetic. Only one clause is changed.
Therefore, I would urge upon the Government to go back on this Bill and bring a Bill which will establish an autonomous institution of excellence which this country needs.
In so far as the administrative autonomy is concerned, it always depends upon the finances which an institution gets. Those who pay the piper, they say, call the tune. (Contd. by RSS/2Q)
SHRI BALAVANT ALIAS BAL APTE (CONTD.): That should not be the situation. The financial support to the institutions should be granted and the Ministry has only that role to play. The Ministry cannot determine things, and therefore, to ensure this autonomy, the appointment of persons on the Governing Body, the appointment of the Director, should be through a process which will ensure that that autonomy is fully protected.
Secondly, Sir, in so far as the functioning of the Institute is concerned, the employees, the staff and the students are the essential part of an institution. In fact, if an institution is academic, then the student is at the centre of the institution. Today, if the administration does not think about the welfare of the students and the staff, particularly in a medical institution, the residents, then the administration goes haywire, the interests suffer, the institute suffers, the students suffer, and the public suffers. Therefore, it is imperative that these interests are represented in the administration. Participation is really the gravamen of any democracy, of any governance, and therefore, I would urge that the governance of this Institute should include the representatives of the employees, the staff and the students. Sir, my submission to this House is that unless you do it, time and again, there will be disruption in the activities. The resident doctors have genuine grievances, and those grievances are never addressed unless they go on strike, and if they go on strike, then it is a step against the people, because a medical doctor is considered to be a God, and therefore, they suffer both ways. The people are against them and the administration is against them. All over the country, in so far as public hospitals are concerned, the resident doctors work much more than what they are paid for. I know in most of these hospitals, the resident doctors work almost for 24 hours continuously. They are always on 24 hours duty, and they are not looked after, and a time comes when they consolidate and agitate. If this particular malady is to be addressed, I would urge that they should be represented effectively in the management so that they will be responsible and their grievances will also be addressed. With these, I would suggest that the Government should not proceed with this Bill without making proper amendments. Thank you. (Ends)
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY
Vice-Chairman, Sir, thank you for giving me this opportunity to speak on the
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry Bill, 2007.
Sir, I am from Puducherry. I know the
Institute very well. I am grateful to the late Prime Minister of India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, who was a visionary, who thought
that in southern parts of the country, there should be a medical institute of
excellence. In fact, Sir, all attempts were made to bring that Institute to
Tamil Nadu, but Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru intervened
and said that
(contd. by 2r)
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY (CONTD.): Apart from that, the in-patient facilities
and various other faculties have been started.
Research work has also been started.
But the budget allocation for the Institute was not up to the
expectations. The Director, who has
been appointed earlier, even the Government of India gave money, was not able
to acquire equipment for surgeries, especially, for heart surgery, orthopaedics
and even for ophthalmology. They were
not able to do it because of the cumbersome procedures. For every sanction, the file has to go to the
Ministry of Health and Family Affairs, and by the time the file returns back
the cost of equipment will go up, at least, by 50 per cent within six
months. Even in the case of appointment
of professors, assistant professor and the staff, it takes a lot of time. I have made in this august House several
submissions stating that the doctors, who have been appointed there from the
all-India quota, go to JIPMER because there is a doctors' quota in the
Institute for the admission of their children.
They work there for six months and after getting admission for their
children in the Institute, they get transferred to another place. They don't stay there. Minimum 50 per cent of the posts at the
levels of professors, assistant professors and lecturers are lying vacant. Therefore, time and again, we have been
pleading with the Government of India that more powers should be given to this
Institute. Considering that, I am grateful to the hon. Minister for taking a
lot of interest. Apart from that,
certain obstacles have been created to prevent this Institute from becoming
autonomous. We also know that and that
is why this Bill has been brought to this august House. This Bill was brought for the purpose of
giving autonomous status to the Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical
Education and Research. There was some
agitation and there were some apprehensions in the mind of the employees who
are working there. They have been saying
that their service conditions will be changed and there will not be regular
growth for the Institute. They have
these apprehensions. From time to time,
discussions were held between the employees and the medical authorities at the
Joint Secretary and the Director levels.
They met the employees and they tried to remove the apprehensions in
their mind. I would like to submit that,
as a person coming from that area, we will not compromise on three things: (1)
better patient care; (2) employees' interests; (3) Institute's interests. On these three things there should not be any
compromise because it is the only Institute in the entire South India which
equals the AIIMS and the PG Institute at
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY (CONTD): Sir, the hon.
Minster comes from a place which is just
SHRI AMAR SINGH: Sir, I want to clarify one thing.
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIEN): Mr. Narayanasamy, are you yielding?
SHRI AMAR SINGH: He has mentioned my name.
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: I have mentioned about the Committee.
SHRI AMAR SINGH: I want to clarify it. Sir, you are also, incidentally, esteemed Member of the Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare. This Committee functions very democratically. I simply do what a majority of the Members want me to do. I will be very happy if my esteemed colleague and my friend is there in the Committee. I don't have anything against him. The interest of Puducherry is supreme in my mind.
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Sir, I would like to submit that there is a
SHRI BALAVANT ALIAS BAL APTE: Sir, you are giving more time to the Treasury Benches. When I was speaking, you rang the bell in five minutes.
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Sir, my Party has 18 minutes.
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN: Mr. Narayanasamy, just a minute. Please sit down. This is very unfair to cast aspersions on the Chair. Since you raised this point, listen to me. Your Party had 12 minutes and the time you have taken is 13 minutes, from 2.15 p.m. to 2.28 p.m. While you were speaking, your Party gave another name to me directly and requested that he should also be called. I agreed. You should understand that you have exhausted your Party's time and taken one minute more and then you are complaining. Your Party gave another name also. The Congress Party has 18 minutes. Mr. Narayanasamy started at 2.28 p.m. He has taken only 11 minutes. Now, he has got seven minutes more. Actually, he would have concluded before that. Now you have made me to stop him, he will take another seven minutes.
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Sir, I want five minutes more because I am from that area. (Followed by 2T)
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIEN): Mr. Apte, as per your requirement, I should not call your party colleague because your party's time has already been exhausted. But the Chair has some discretion, and we try to accommodate maximum speakers. So, don't question the Chair. That is what I am telling you.
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, there is one area
where we are proud of our Institute. The
students, who are selected for this Institute, are poor children. It was the mission of Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru
that children coming from the rural areas should get medical education. That is being continued. Even the fee, that is collected from the
students, does not exceed more than Rs.10,000 per
year, including the hostel facilities.
We cannot imagine this kind of a fee structure in today's world where
medical education has become a very costly affair. But, in this Institute, this low fee
structure has been maintained for years together. Therefore, I want the hon. Minister to see to
it that the fee structure is not altered.
A lot of improvements have to be done in this Institute because this is
not only an ordinary medical college, but it is also a medical Education and
Research Institute. In this Research
Institute, medical research should be given prime importance by the authorities. When the hon. Minister makes it an autonomous
body, the allocation of funds should not be a problem. I am indeed glad that the hon. Minister had
allocated more funds from his Ministry even earlier. But I want the special attention of the hon.
Minister to make it on par with the All India Institute of Medical Sciences and
the PGIMER at Chandigarh because, as the hon. Minister himself said, these are
the three Institutes in which a lot of research work is being done. Several faculties have been opened in the
other two Institutes, and the hon. Minister should bring JIPMER on par with the
other Institutes, which are there in the
Another point is that you have given the candidates two options; they can either continue as employees of this Institute, or, they can also become Government servants. You have given them these options because there is a recommendation of the Parliamentary Standing Committee that the employees should be given one year's time instead of six months. This may kindly be considered by the Government because one year is a sufficient time, instead of six months, and, on this, I entirely agree with the hon. Committee.
Sir, a recommendation has been made that the hon. Minister should not be the Chairman of the Institute, which has been accepted by the Government. As far as the Director or the Chairman is concerned, he is going to be a professional. And the Government is accepting this.
Further, I would like the hon. Minister to lay special emphasis on three or four areas. No.1 is the neuro surgery. As we all know, a lot of accident cases are coming there. So, neuro surgery should be given prime importance by the Government. Secondly, a lot of poor patients come there for heart surgery. As it is, this hospital extends free treatment for heart surgery to the poor people. But, unfortunately, the doctors, are giving them time for operation in 2011 and 2012. How can a heart patient keep himself alive for seven to eight years without proper treatment? I want the hon. Minister to see to it that this Department is strengthened, and there should be more number of doctors in this Department. In other countries, we find that they have got facilities for heart surgery even in the interior places. The third is the Orthopaedics Department. This Department is doing a good job. I want the hon. Minister to see to it that this Department is strengthened, considering the amount of fatal cases that are coming here. (Continued by 2U)
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P. J. KURIEN): Mr. Barun Mukherjee.
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Sir, the Orthopaedics Department ...(interruption)...
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN: Don't speak with your back turned to the Chair. There are certain ...(Interruptions)... I don't know why..(Interruption)...
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Sir, surely, more patients, especially physically handicapped patients, would get treatment from the hospital.
Then, Sir, there are a lot of path labs in the hospital. More facilities need to be provided. I am not a Doctor; the hon. Minister is a Doctor. He knows how to improve the institute.
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN: Please conclude.
NARAYANASAMY: Sir, the Government of India is giving Rs. 500 crores for AIIMS and
about Rs. 300 crores to
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIEN): Please conclude.
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Sir, I shall make just one more point and then conclude.
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN: Now, your party's time is over. Whatever time you take now is extra.
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Sir, I would like the hon. Minister to introduce more Post Graduate courses. That is very important here, because when you make it a research institute, there should be more Post Graduate courses so that students passing out from there could go in for research work. Therefore, there should be more Post Graduate courses to which students can be admitted.
Sir, I am grateful for the efforts made by the hon. Minister to develop this institute. This Bill would help poor patients, the students and also the employees. I would like the hon. Minister to give categorical assurance that the employees will not be victimized and that their interests would be safeguarded. Ultimately, as I said, instead of six months they should make it one year in respect of other Government servants or employees of this institute.
With these words, I support the Bill and I would like the House to unanimously approve the Bill. Thank you, Sir. (Ends)
SHRI AMAR SINGH: Sir, I have to go for a meeting of the Health Committee and so, I would like to speak first.
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN: Okay. Mr. Amar Singh.
ÁÖß †´Ö¸ü ØÃÖÆü (ˆ¢Ö¸ü ¯ÖÏ¤êü¿Ö): †Ö¤ü¸üÞÖßµÖ ˆ¯ÖÃÖ³ÖÖ¬µÖõÖ ´ÖÆüÖê¤üµÖ, µÖÆü ×²Ö»Ö ‡ÃÖ ÃÖ¤ü®Ö ´Öë †Ö•Ö ¸üÜÖÖ ÝÖµÖÖ Æîü… ‡ÃÖÛêú ¯ÖÆü»Öê ´Öï®Öê ‡ÃÖÛêú ²ÖÖ¸êü ´Öë ‹Ûú ¸ü¯Ö™ü †¯Ö®Öß Ã£ÖÖµÖß ÃÖ×´Ö×ŸÖ Ûúß ŸÖ¸ü±ú ÃÖê ÃÖ¤ü®Ö Ûêú ¯Ö™ü»Ö ¯Ö¸ü ¸üÜÖß £Öß, ×•ÖÃÖÛêú ´ÖÖ®Ö®ÖßµÖ ÃÖ¤üÃµÖ Ã¾ÖµÖÓ †Ö¯Ö ³Öß Æïü… ×•Ö®Ö ´Öã§üÖë Ûêú ²ÖÖ¸êü ´Öë Æü´ÖÖ¸êü ¾Ö×¸üÂšü ÃÖÖ£Öß ÁÖß ®ÖÖ¸üÖµÖÞÖÃÖÖ´Öß •Öß ×¾ÖÃŸÖÖ¸ü ÃÖê ÛúÆü ¸üÆêü £Öê, ˆ®Ö ÃÖ³Öß ´Öã§üÖë ¯Ö¸ü Æü´Ö®Öê †¯Ö®Öß ×¸ü¯ÖÖê™Ôü ´Öë ×¾ÖÃŸÖÖ¸ü ÃÖê ²ÖŸÖÖµÖÖ Æîü… ´Öê¸ß ¾Ö×¸üÂšü ÃÖÖ£Öß ÁÖß´ÖŸÖß ¾ÖéÓ¤üÖ ÛúÖ¸üŸÖ •Öß ³Öß --•ÖÖê ‡ÃÖ ×²Ö»Ö ÛúÖ ¯ÖÏÖºþ¯Ö †ÖµÖÖ Æîü, ˆÃÖ´Öë †Öî¸ü Ã™ïüØ›üÝÖ Ûú´Öê™üß Ûúß ×¸ü¯ÖÖê™Ôü ´Öë ÛúÖ±úß ÃÖ´ÖÖ®ÖŸÖÖ ®ÖÆüà £Öß… Ûú‡Ô ´Öã§êü Æïü, ×•Ö®Ö´Öë ‹Ûú ¯ÖÏ´ÖãÜÖ ´Öã§üÖ µÖÆü ³Öß £ÖÖ ×Ûú ´ÖÖ®Ö®ÖßµÖ ´ÖÓ¡Öß •Öß ‡ÃÖÛêú †¬µÖõÖ ®ÖÆüà ÆüÖëÝÖê, ŸÖÖ×Ûú ‡ÃÖÛúß Ã¾ÖÖµÖ¢ÖŸÖÖ, †Öò™üÖê®ÖÖò´Öß ÛúÖµÖ´Ö ¸üÜÖß •ÖÖ‹, ˆÃÖÛúÖê ×ŸÖ¸üÖê×ÆüŸÖ Ûú¸ü ×¤üµÖÖ ÝÖµÖÖ £ÖÖ, »Öê×Ûú®Ö ¾ÖéÓ¤üÖ •Öß Ûêú ÛúÆü®Öê ÃÖê, Æü´Ö »ÖÖêÝÖÖë Ûêú ÛúÆü®Öê ÃÖê †Öî¸ü ®ÖÖ¸üÖµÖÞÖÃÖÖ´Öß •Öß ŸÖ£ÖÖ ÃÖ³Öß ÃÖ¤üÃµÖÖë Ûêú ÛúÆü®Öê Ûêú ²ÖÖ¤ü ÃÖ¸üÛúÖ¸ü ®Öê ˆÃÖ´Öë Ûãú”û ²Ö¤ü»ÖÖ¾Ö »ÖÖ®Öê ÛúÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÎú´Ö ×ÛúµÖÖ Æîü… »Öê×Ûú®Ö, ´Öï ²Ö›Íêü †Ö¤ü¸ü Ûêú ÃÖÖ£Ö ÛúÆü®ÖÖ “ÖÖÆüŸÖÖ ÆæÑü ×Ûú •ÖÖê ...(¾µÖ¾Ö¬ÖÖ®Ö)...
ÃÖÓÃÖ¤üßµÖ ÛúÖµÖÔ ´ÖÓ¡ÖÖ»ÖµÖ ´Öë ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÓ¡Öß (ÁÖß ÃÖã¸êü¿Ö ¯Ö“ÖÖî¸üß) : µÖÆü Ûîú×²Ö®Öê™ü ÛúÖ ×›üÃÖß•ÖÌ®Ö Æîü…
ÁÖß †´Ö¸ü ØÃÖÆü : šüßÛú Æîü, µÖÆü Ûîú×²Ö®Öê™ü ÛúÖ ×›üÃÖß•ÖÌ®Ö Æîü ...(¾µÖ¾Ö¬ÖÖ®Ö)... µÖÆü ÛúÆü ¸üÆêü Æïü ×Ûú Ûîú×²Ö®Öê™ü ÛúÖ ×›üÃÖß•ÖÌ®Ö Æîü… †ŸÖ: ‡®Ö »ÖÖêÝÖÖë Ûêú ¯ÖÏÃŸÖÖ¾Ö ¯Ö¸ü Ûîú×²Ö®Öê™ü ®Öê µÖÆü ×›üÃÖß•ÖÌ®Ö ×»ÖµÖÖ Æîü, ²Ö¤ü»ÖÖ¾Ö »ÖÖµÖÖ Æîü, ‡ÃÖÛêú ×»Ö‹ Æü´Ö Ûîú×²Ö®Öê™ü ÛúÖê ¬Ö®µÖ¾ÖÖ¤ü ¤êüŸÖê Æïü… »Öê×Ûú®Ö, ´Öï µÖÆü ÛúÆü®ÖÖ “ÖÖÆæÑüÝÖÖ ×Ûú •ÖÖê ¤üÖê-ŸÖß®Ö ²ÖÖŸÖë ®ÖÖ¸üÖµÖÞÖÃÖÖ´Öß •Öß ®Öê ÛúÆüß Æïü, ˆ®Ö´Öë ˆ®ÆüÖë®Öê ÛúÆüÖ Æîü ×Ûú ‡ÓÃ™üß™ü¶æ™ü Ûúß †Öò™üÖê®ÖÖò´Öß †Öî¸ü ÝÖ¸üß²Ö ´Ö¸üß•ÖÖë Ûúß ÃÖã¸üõÖÖ ŸÖ£ÖÖ ÝÖ¸üß²Ö ×¾ÖªÖÙ£ÖµÖÖë Ûúß ³ÖŸÖá, ‡®Ö ²ÖÖŸÖÖë ¯Ö¸ü ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü Ûú¸ü®Öê Ûêú ×»Ö‹ ÛúÆüÖ ÝÖµÖÖ Æîü… ‡®Ö ÃÖ³Öß ´Öã§üÖë ÛúÖê ³Öß Æü´Ö®Öê †¯Ö®Öß ×¸ü¯ÖÖê™Ôü ´Öë ÃÖÓ¤üÙ³ÖŸÖ ×ÛúµÖÖ Æîü… ´ÖÓ¡Öß •Öß Æü´ÖÖ¸êü ×´Ö¡Ö Æïü †Öî¸ü ²ÖÆãüŸÖ †“”êû ¾µÖ×ŒŸÖ Æïü, »Öê×Ûú®Ö ¯ÖŸÖÖ ®ÖÆüà ŒµÖÖë Æü¸ü ´ÖÖ´Ö»Öê ´Öë Ã™ïüØ›üÝÖ Ûú´Öê™üß ÃÖê, ×•ÖÃÖ´Öë ‡®ÖÛêú ¤ü»Ö Ûêú ³Öß »ÖÖêÝÖ Æïü, Æü´ÖÖ¸êü ¤ü»Ö Ûêú ³Öß »ÖÖêÝÖ Æïü ŸÖ£ÖÖ ×•ÖÃÖ´Öë ¯Öæ¸ß ÃÖÓÃÖ¤ü ÛúÖ ¯ÖÏ×ŸÖ×®Ö×¬ÖŸ¾Ö Æîü..… (2›ü²»µÖæ/‹“Ö0‹´Ö0‹ÃÖ0 ¯Ö¸ü ÛÎú´Ö¿Ö:)
ÁÖß †´Ö¸ü ØÃÖÆü (ÛÎú´ÖÖÝÖŸÖ) : ´ÖÆüÖê¤üµÖ, ´ÖãôÖê ´ÖÖ»Öæ´Ö Æîü ×Ûú µÖÆü mandatory ®ÖÆüà Æîü ×Ûú Ã™ëüØ›üÝÖ Ûú´Öê™üß Ûúß ×¸ü¯ÖÖê™Ôü ÛúÖê ÃÖ¸üÛúÖ¸ü ´ÖÖ®Öê, »Öê×Ûú®Ö †ÝÖ¸ü Ã™ëüØ›üÝÖ Ûú´Öê™üß Ûúß ×¸ü¯ÖÖê™Ôü ÛúÖê ®ÖÆüà ´ÖÖ®Ö®ÖÖ Æîü †Öî¸ü ÃÖ¸üÛúÖ¸ü ÛúÖê †¯Ö®Öê ´Ö®Ö´ÖÖ®Öê œÓüÝÖ ÃÖê Æüß ×²Ö»Ö »ÖÖ®ÖÖ Æîü, ŸÖÖê ×±ú¸ ü´Öê¸üÖ †Ö¯Ö Ûêú ´ÖÖ¬µÖ´Ö ÃÖê ÃÖ¸üÛúÖ¸ü ÃÖê †®Öã¸üÖê¬Ö Æîü ×Ûú ¾ÖÆü ‡ÃÖ Ã™ëüØ›üÝÖ Ûú´Öê™üß Ûúß ¾µÖ¾ÖÃ£ÖÖ ÛúÖê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¯ŸÖ Ûú¸ü ¤êü… ´ÖÆüÖê¤üµÖ, Æü´Ö »ÖÖêÝÖÖë ÛúÖê ÛúÖ±úß ÃÖ´ÖµÖ ¤êü®ÖÖ ¯Ö›ÍüŸÖÖ Æîü, ÛúÖ´Ö Ûú¸ü®ÖÖ ¯Ö›ÍüŸÖÖ Æîü †Öî¸ü ˆÃÖ ´Öë ÛúÖê‡Ô ¸üÖ•Ö®Öß×ŸÖ ®ÖÆüà Æîü… ´ÖÆüÖê¤üµÖ, Ã™ëüØ›üÝÖ Ûú´Öê™üß ´Öë ÃÖ³Öß ¤ü»Ö Ûêú »ÖÖêÝÖ ÃÖÖ´Öæ×ÆüÛú ºþ¯Ö ÃÖê ×²Ö®ÖÖ ¸üÖ•Ö®Öß×ŸÖ Ûêú ÛúÖ´Ö Ûú¸üŸÖê Æïü… ´Öê¸üÖ ÃÖÖî³ÖÖÝµÖ Æîü ×Ûú †Ö¯Ö ³Öß Æü´ÖÖ¸üß Ûú´Öê™üß Ûêú ÃÖ¤üÃµÖ Æïü †Öî¸ü ˆÃÖ Ûêú ²ÖÖ¤ü Æü´Ö ÛúÆüŸÖê Æïü ×Ûú ÝÖ¸üß²ÖÖë Ûúß ³ÖŸÖá ÛúÖ ‡ÓŸÖ•ÖÖ´Ö ÆüÖê, ¯ÖœÍüÖ‡Ô-×»ÖÜÖÖ‡Ô ´Öë ±úßÃÖ ÛúÖ •µÖÖ¤üÖ ¯ÖÏÖºþ¯Ö ®Ö ÆüÖê †Öî¸ü †ÝÖ¸ü Æü´Ö ÛúÆüŸÖê Æïü ×Ûú ´Öã°ŸÖ ‡»ÖÖ•Ö Ûúß ¾µÖ¾ÖÃ£ÖÖ “Ö»ÖŸÖß ¸üÆêü, †ÝÖ¸ü Æü´Ö ÛúÆüŸÖê Æïü ×Ûú ‡ÃÖ Ûúß †Öò™üÖò®ÖÖê´Öß ²Ö¸üÛú¸üÖ¸ü ¸üÆêü ŸÖÖê ‡ÃÖ ´Öë Æü´Ö ‹êÃÖß ÛúÖê‡Ô ²ÖÖŸÖ ®ÖÆüà ÛúÆü ¸üÆêü Æïü ×•ÖÃÖ ÛúÖê ´ÖÖ®Ö®Öê ´Öë ×¤üŒÛúŸÖ ÆüÖê…
´ÖÆüÖê¤üµÖ, ´ÖÖ®Ö®ÖßµÖ ´ÖÓ¡Öß •Öß µÖã¾ÖÖ Æïü, ˆŸÃÖÖÆüß Æïü †Öî¸ü ›üÖòŒ™ü¸ü ³Öß Æïü… ´Öï ˆ®Ö ÃÖê ×®Ö¾Öê¤ü®Ö ÛúºÓþÝÖÖ ×Ûú †ÝÖ¸ü ¾ÖÆü †¯Ö®Öê †Ó¤ü¸ü ¤êü®Öê Ûúß ¯ÖÏ¾Öé×¢Ö »ÖÖ‹Ó †Öî¸ü ÃÖ³Öß ÛúÖê ÃÖÖ£Ö »ÖêÛú¸ü “Ö»Ö®Öê Ûúß ¯ÖÏ¾Öé×¢Ö »ÖÖ‹Ó ŸÖÖê •ÖÖê ÃÖ¤îü¾Ö ×¾Ö¾ÖÖ¤ü ÃÖê ×‘Ö¸êü ¸üÆü®Öê Ûúß ‹Ûú ¾Öé×¢Ö ˆ®Ö Ûêú ®ÖêŸÖéŸ¾Ö ´Öë “Ö»Ö ¸üÆüß Æîü, ˆÃÖ ÃÖê ˆ®Ö Ûúß ÛúÖ±úß ²Ö“ÖŸÖ ÆüÖêÝÖß… ´Öï ˆ®Ö ÛúÖê ÃÖ»ÖÖÆü ¤êü®Öê Ûúß ×Ã£Ö×ŸÖ †Öî¸ü Æîü×ÃÖµÖŸÖ ´Öë ®ÖÆüà ÆæÓü… ‡ÃÖ×»Ö‹ ´Öê¸üß ×¾Ö®ÖŸÖß Æîü ×Ûú Ûú´Ö-ÃÖê-Ûú´Ö Ã™ëüØ›üÝÖ Ûú´Öê™üß ´Öë Æü´Ö »ÖÖêÝÖÖë ®Öê •ÖÖê ÃÖÓÃŸÖã×ŸÖµÖÖÓ Ûúß Æïü †Öî¸ü Æü´ÖÖ¸üß ¾Ö×¸üÂšü ÃÖÖ£Öß ¾ÖéÓ¤üÖ ÛúÖ¸üŸÖ •Öß ®Öê •ÖÖê ˆÃÖ ´Öë ²Ö¤ü»ÖÖ¾Ö Ûúß ²ÖÖŸÖ ¸üÜÖß Æîü, ˆÃÖÛêú ‰ú¯Ö¸ü ÃÖ¸üÛúÖ¸ü Ûîú×²Ö®Öê™ü Ûêú £ÖÐæ, •ÖîÃÖÖ×Ûú Æü´ÖÖ¸êü ÃÖÖ£Öß ®Öê ÛúÆüÖ Æîü, ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü-×¾Ö´Ö¿ÖÔ Ûú¸ü Ûêú ‡ÃÖ ×²Ö»Ö Ûêú ¯ÖÏÖºþ¯Ö ÛúÖê ²Ö¤ü»Öê ŸÖÖ×Ûú Ã™ëüØ›üÝÖ Ûú´Öê™üß Ûêú ÃÖ³Öß ÃÖ¤üÃµÖÖë Ûêú ´ÖÖ®Ö-ÃÖ´´ÖÖ®Ö Ûúß ¸üõÖÖ ÆüÖê ÃÖÛêú, Æü´ÖÖ¸üß ³Ö¾Ö®ÖÖ†Öë †Öî¸ü ¯ÖÖÓ×›ü“Öê¸üß Ûêú ÝÖ¸üß²Ö »ÖÖêÝÖÖë Ûúß ³ÖÖ¾Ö®ÖÖ†Öë Ûúß ¾Ö •Ö®Ö-×ÆüŸÖ Ûúß ÃÖã¸üõÖÖ Ûúß •ÖÖ ÃÖÛúê… ²ÖÆãüŸÖ-²ÖÆãüŸÖ ¬Ö®µÖ¾ÖÖ¤ü… (ÃÖ´ÖÖ¯ŸÖ)
SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT (
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Can you yield for a minute? It is not cutting across party lines. ...(Interruptions)...
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIEN): Do you yield?
SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: I am not yielding. Why should I yield to Mr. Narayanasamy who has already taken so much time of the House? Now, he wants to encroach on my time. ...(Interruptions)...
SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Let us not give wrong information to the House. ...(Interruptions)...
THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIEN): No, no; Mr. Narayanasamy. She is not yielding. ...(Interruptions)... Please...(Interruptions)...
SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: Sir, I am giving the correct information. He may not be there. But, I want to say, Sir, that for two years, there has been this popular agitation, cutting across party lines, on the issue of this Bill. Now, in the case of a Bill which is for the autonomy of the institution and a Bill which is going to help the Institute and which is supposed to help the people of that area, normally, there should not be an agitation against such a Bill. So, where does the gap come? Why is it that today in public perception, in Puducherry, the aam aadmi and the people of that area believe that this Bill is not going to benefit them? In fact, it is going to take away some of the facilities that they enjoy. Shri Amar Singhji has very correctly pointed to the Standing Committee's Report, and I entirely share his views that once the Standing Committee gives recommendations, the Government should give far more attention and seriousness to those recommendations, more so, when they coincide with the feelings of the people of that particular area. There are three basic issues of this Bill which have not been reflected, and therefore, I oppose the Bill. The first point is that this Institute is unique in the sense that generally in India, where, due to privatisation policies, the provision of health has become more or less an instrument for profit and loot of the people, this Institute, because of the instinctive devotion of the faculty, of the doctors, of the staff and the policies of successive Governments of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, has ensured that the poor people of a much larger region can get healthcare free of cost.
(Contd. by 2x-kgg)
SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT (contd.): I know, Mr. Narayanasamy has talked about the UPA Government's policies to ensure cheap health care for the BPL card-holders, etc. But we know that even in the capital of this country, user fees are being charged even from the poor people. In fact, it is extremely difficult now for the poor people to access free health care. The uniqueness of the institute in Puducherry is that it is providing such care.
If you look at the objects of the institute, Sir, I would draw the attention of the Members to clause 13. From (a) to (o), all kinds of objects have been mentioned in this Bill. However, the basic object for this institute is well known and it is reflected in the Statement of Objects and Reasons, namely, "this institute has been providing quality education and excellent patient care delivery services over the years." It is there in the Objects and Reasons. But if you look at the objects of the institute, it is missing, entirely. Now, what do the people there feel? The people there feel that with the pressure of private medical hospitals in that area, because the poor people are getting access to free health care, there is a very powerful lobby working which wants to undermine public health care in this country, and, at present, one of the targets in that entire region is this institute. Therefore, it may be a coincidence, it may be inadvertent that there is an absence of this object. I do not want to attribute motives to anybody. That is why, I have moved a very specific amendment saying, "In the objects of the institute, please include the object of excellent patient care free of cost."
The Minister told me that he cannot say 'free of cost' that he can say 'for poor patients'. I said okay; you can say 'for poor patients', but I do not want it in the rules, it has to be in the objects of the institute so that nobody else comes and undermines public health care. I am sure the Minister is very committed to public health care and he has no problem in saying that, but it could not be done.
second point. The other unique feature of this institute is the local poor
people in that area, their students, have two
important facilities through this institute. One, there is a specific
reservation. That is, at least 20 seats out of 75 are given for the local
people. That is what is the present situation. Why
poor people can access it is, this is the one institute where you can get your
entire education for the cost of just Rs.10,000! In
Tamil Nadu, in Puducherry, in
Therefore, both these aspects are very crucial to the unique character of JIPMER. I have spoken to him after I have moved the amendments and requested him to at least ensure that these unique features of an institute, in the absence of a guarantee in the Act, are not eroded by anybody having given an opportunity to. What is the harm when you are having an Act to ensure that the existing facilities are protected? (Contd. by sss/2y)