PREVIOUS HOUR

MCM-TDB&KGG/1Z&2A/12.55&1.00

߸ ֻ ֤ (ָ Ϥ): ֮־֤ ֳ֯ן , Ӥֵ (ӿ֮) ׾֬, 2007 ִ֣Ԯ ӡ ֬և ֛ ™ ָ , ו֮ ָ ֻ ̸֕ ֟, פ ֟ , ִ֣Ԯ ִ ך ™ ֓ ֋ , ָ ״ֻ ֳ ״ֻ֮ ֛ ֲ ֮ ֛ ֲ ß֮ ֤֕ ֲ ֤ ך , ֤֕ ִ ֮ ֟ ִָ ֤֕ ֮֯ Ù֮ ֟ , ִ ָ Ӿ ֻ ֟ ו ָ ß֮ ֮־ָ ָ֕ ֟ ָ ֤֕ ָ֕ ֟ ֮ ִ ֮ ׻֋ ֟ ָ ָ ָ ֮ ֋, ֮ ֛օ ָ, ֻ פ , , և ֻ ִ ӓ ָ ֋ Ù ֟ ָ֯ ֟ Ӆ ו֮֟ , ָ ָ ܾ֮ ָ ֤֕ ֟ , ԓ׸ ֟ , ֓ ׾֬ և ָ ָ ֮ ֮ ֛ ͅ ִ ֲ ԟ ״ֻ֟ פ ִ ֟ ֤ פ ֟ , ָ Ù ֮֋ ׻Ù ֤֕ ָ ֳ ֋ ִָ ׻֋ ֟ ָ ֮ ֻ , - ֿ ָ ֻ֟ ֮ ִ ֤֕ ׯ ֋ ֲ ָ ָ ֻօ ָ ִ - ֻ ֛ : ָ ֮ ׮׿֟ ׾֬ þ֟ ָ ֋ ֯ ֳָ ֯ ָ ׾֬ ֋ - ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

SHRI S. ANBALAGAN (TAMIL NADU): * (Spoke in Tamil)

(Followed by 2b-kls)

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* English version of Tamil Speech will be issued as a Supplement.
KLS/2B-1.05

SHRI D. RAJA (TAMIL NADU): Sir, I support the Bill.

(Ends)

SHRI SILVIUS CONDPAN (ASSAM): Sir, while congratulating the hon. Minister, I rise to support this Bill.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: You have only two minutes. You asked for it. Like Shri Raja you also support the Bill.

SHRI SILVIUS CONDPAN: I rise to support this Bill because it has come to protect the interests of the workmen of the country. The workmen have been very much exploited throughout and with this Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Bill, to a large extent, relief will be given to the working class. I would like to pinpoint certain things, Sir. The minimum ceiling for the payment of bonus should be raised from 8.33 to at least 10 per cent. The bonus facility should be extended to the unorganised sector workers. I will request the Government, the Ministry of Labour to make out the details about how to reach the unorganised sector workers in order to make the payment of bonus. Sir, while determining the payment of bonus every year, the balancesheet prepared by the different industrial houses, the Government has to find out a machinery to see whether the balancesheet is really prepared showing the profit and loss while deciding to pay the bonus to the working class. The other point is this, Sir. I come from the tea industry area. The payment of bonus is even sometimes decided to the last ceiling, that is, 8.33 and for that too while paying they say they are badly put to loss and they try to split the payment of bonus. For example, this splitting of the 8.33 bonus is made in two, three, or four instalments. In order to avoid this instalment system of paying the bonus by the industry and exploitation of workers, the Act has to provide certain compulsions that there shall be no splitting of payment of bonus. Whatever percentage has been agreed -- 10 per cent or whatever extent it is increased to the maximum -- while paying the bonus, the bonus payment should not be split while giving it to the workers because it does not give any benefit. There should be very strict vigilance every year. A direction should go to all the State Governments that they have to oversee how the balancesheet is seen and prepared. The Government must be vigilant, their Finance Departments have to be vigilant to see to what extent they are really making profit or they have really made loss. Otherwise, in that case also, there is exploitation. (Time-bell) With this submission, Sir, I thank the hon. Labour Minister for bringing forward this Bill for payment of Bonus. Thank you. (Ends)

SHRI TIRUCHI. SIVA (TAMAIL NADU): Sir, I wholeheartedly support the Bill. (Ends)

(Followed by 2c/NBR)

-KLS/NBR-SCH/2C/1.10.

THE MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) OF THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT (SHRI OSCAR FERNANDES): Sir, I could not make my statement on this Bill at the time of moving the Bill. So, if you permit, first, I wish to make the statement necessitating promulgate the Ordinance and other points.

As the hon. Members are aware, the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, provides for payment of bonus to persons employed in certain establishments on the basis of profits or on the basis of production or productivity and for matters connected therewith. The Act provides for payment of bonus to employees of 'factories' and other establishments employing 20 or more persons, excluding some categories of employees as contained in Section 32 like employees of the Life Insurance Corporation, Seamen, dock workers, university employees, employees employed through contractors on building operations, etc.

The eligibility limit and the calculation ceiling were last revised from Rs. 2,500 to Rs. 3,500 per month and from Rs. 1,600 to Rs. 2,500 per month respectively, in the year 1995 and made effective from 1st April, 1993, first through an Ordinance and then with the amendment to the principal Act. At present, the employees employed through contractors on building operations are not eligible for bonus as per Clause (vi) of Section 32 of the Payment of bonus Act, 1965.

The Second National Commission on Labour, in its Report, submitted to the Government in the year 2002, recommended that the eligibility limit and calculation ceiling should be enhanced to Rs. 7,500 and Rs. 3,500 per month, respectively. The workers' unions have been demanding the revision of the eligibility limit as well as the calculation ceiling since long. The issue was taken up for discussion in the 41st Session of the Indian Labour Conference held on the 27th - 28th April, 2007. I am thankful to employees, employers and other stakeholders in arriving at a consensus to enhance the eligibility limit from the present Rs. 3,500 to Rs. 10,000 per month and calculation ceiling from Rs. 2,500 to Rs. 3,500 per month. Further, it was also decided to bring employees employed through contractors on building operations within the ambit of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965.

Accordingly, after taking the approval of the Cabinet, the Payment of bonus (Amendment) Ordinance, 2007 (8 of 2007) was promulgated on 27th October, 2007, as both the Houses of Parliament were not in session and the festival season was in progress. The Ordinance contained the following amendments:

Amendment to Clause (13) of Section 2 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, to raise the eligibility limit for payment of bonus from the salary or wage of Rs. 3,500 per month to Rs. 10,000 per month;

Amendment to Section 12 of the Payment of bonus Act, 1965, to raise the ceiling for calculation purpose from the salary or wage from Rs. 2,500 per month to Rs. 3,500 per month;

Deletion of Clause (vi) of Section 32 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, so as to cover employees employed through contractors on building operations.

In order to ensure that the employees receive the enhanced bonus during the current festival season, the amendment, through an Ordinance, was made effective from 1st April, 2006, as the bonus paid for the year is for 2006-07.

The Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Bill, 2007, was considered and passed by the Lok Sabha on 27th November, 2007.

Sir, hon. Members have spoken on this Bill. Our friend, Mr. Ajay from the BJP has raised the issue of promulgation of Ordinance.

(CONTD. BY USY "2D")

-NBR-USY/2D/1.15

 

SHRI OSCAR FERNANDES (CONTD.): We do not wish to bring Ordinances. We would like to bring legislations in the Parliament. But, since there were requests from all sides, labourers and from everywhere, that bonus should be paid on the occasion of Deepawali or puja. We could have brought the Bill in this Session, but workers would have been deprived of their bonus during the festival season. So, we thought of bringing an Ordinance. I think, the Members will bear with us. We really appreciate the spirit that everything should be brought before the House. That's why we have brought the Bill before the House.

Sir, Members have also raised the issue of profitability and bringing in a comprehensive Bill. We have taken up the matter on a very limited scope. As we are aware, we, in the Ministry of Labour, work on a tripartite basis, where we take the workers, management and the Government together in arriving at a decision. Even on the issue of ceiling, the Labour Commission itself had recommended Rs. 7,500/-. Workers had demanded for a higher ceiling, and they demanded Rs. 10,000/-. We took the management into confidence; and, despite Labour Commission's recommendation of Rs.7,500/-, with the cooperation of workers and management we were able to raise it to Rs. 10,000/- Hon. Member, Chandranji, was asking as to how we arrived at Rs. 10,000/- We were able to arrive at Rs. 10,000/- through an agreement between the workers and the management and the Government. That is how, taking into the cost of living also as one of the measures to decide the ceiling limit, we reached at this figure.

There have been various suggestions that bonus should be linked to profit. If loss is there, you carry on by the present law. If there is higher profit, gained by any of the institutions, we should be able to give a higher bonus. This is a larger issue. We can discuss it in the Labour Conference, and take the managements into confidence, then, arrive at some conclusion. And, I don't think, when it is a question of higher profits, the managements will back out. If there is logic, possibility is there. We will do our best, from the Government, to discuss the matter with both, labour and management.

Hon. Member, Reddyji, has raised the issue of paying bonus to construction workers on a weekly basis. He is justified in asking for this. At present, we are giving bonus to construction workers. We have put in thirty days of work under one contractor. We will see how it can be evolved. It is not an easy task. Workers work with different contractors for a limited number of days. So, it is a very difficult thing, yet we will go into this issue and see whether this particular suggestion, given by Reddyji, could also be implemented.

There are suggestions that a large section of workers, belonging to the unorganised section workers, is left out of the Bonus Act. That is why we have brought in the Unorganised Sector Workers' Bill, whereby we are giving social security to the workers. Of course, it is no substitute for bonus. We will definitely see how we can extend the benefit to them. We will study the matter.

Hon. Member, Yadavji, has made a suggestion about nursing homes and schools. We will go into that issue whether this could be extended to them. We want to extend it to as many institutions as possible, provided we can establish a relationship between the management and the workers. What he says is that we can establish a relationship between the school management and the teachers. We will go into that. And, we will be able to take up these matters.

Sir, we will go into each and every suggestion that the Members have made. They have said that we should bring in a comprehensive Bill on bonus. We will take that into consideration after discussing with both, management and the workers.

I thank each and every Member, who has participated in this debate. Thank you very much. I commend....(Interruptions)

SHRI TAPAN KUMAR SEN: What about calculation ceiling to extend to the Central Government's Railway and Defence employees

SHRI OSCAR FERNANDES: Sir, this does not come under the purview of the Bonus Act. We are covering only the workers in the unorganised sector. The Railways have taken up on a different basis. They have also, I think, considered grant of bonus in the Railways.

(Contd. by 2e -- VP)

VP/1.20/2E

SHRI OSCAR FERNANDES (CONTD.): They have also, I think, conceded grant of bonus in the Railways. Other sectors are covered, and, as per the Finance Minister, these are being looked into. I am sure, the concerned Ministry will take..(Interruptions)..

SHRI TAPAN KUMAR SEN: You should follow the same ceiling all along. ..(Interruptions).. The Payment of Bonus Act ceiling was always followed by the Railways, Ports and Defence employees. ..(Interruptions).. Then, why is there departure this time? This is the question.

SHRI OSCAR FERNANDES: Sir, now that the Members have raised the issue, I will take up the matter with the concerned Ministry. I am not saying, 'no', to it. I will, definitely, take up the matter with the concerned Ministry. Thought it does not fall under the purview of the Labour Ministry, I will do that. With these words, I commend that the Bill may be passed. (Ends)

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: The question is:

That the Bill further to amend the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, as passed by Lok Sabha, be taken into consideration.

 

The motion was adopted.

 

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: We shall now take up clause-by-clause consideration of the Bill.

 


Clauses 2 to 5 were added to the Bill.

Clause 1, the Enacting Formula and the

Title were added to the Bill.

 

SHRI OSCAR FERNANDES: Sir, I move:

 

That the Bill be passed.

 

The question was put and the motion was adopted.

(Ends)

THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL TRIBAL UNIVERSITY BILL, 2007

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Hon. Members, it has been decided that because of heavy agenda, no lunch break is there today. I think, I have the consensus of the House on this.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Yes.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: We shall now take up the Indira Gandhi National Tribal University Bill, 2007.

THE MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (SHRI ARJUN SINGH): Sir, I beg to move:

That the Bill to establish and incorporate a teaching and affiliating University at Amarkantak in the State of Madhya Pradesh to facilitate and promote avenues of higher education and research facilities for the tribal population in India and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, be taken into consideration.

 

Sir, this is a Bill, which I have the privilege to move today because in the country we have a lot of prominence and priority to issues relating to tribes who inhabit a very large section of the area of the country. It was necessary that various issues relating to them should be dealt with at a higher academic level. Therefore, this University has been proposed to be established. It will be a central university. Since the demand for such an institution has come in from various parts of the country, it has been decided that this University will have campuses in all those areas where there is large tribal population in the States, and that would facilitate its work instead of opening separate institutions everywhere.

Sir, I would like to say one more thing. There is an amendment by an hon. Member about the name of the University. This has not yet come, but I am anticipating and saying something on it with your permission. (Continued by PK/2F)

PK/KLG/2F/1.25

SHRI ARJUN SINGH (CONTD.): Sir, such a University which has the focus of all tribal people and to serve them could not but have been named after Shrimati Indira Gandhi, who had a deep attachment and commitment to the cause of the tribals, in their various areas, or, responsibilities. The research part in this University will have to go into many areas which are considered to be vital by the tribal population, and, I am sure, you will see an interest being taken, in the cultural, social and in political dimensions, on the tribals of India. Therefore, I think, this is appropriate time to have this in place for the benefit of the country. Thank you. (Ends)

The question was proposed.

ֻ (֜) : ֳ֯ן , ֮־֤, ֮֯ ֮ ֛ ײֻ ָ ׾ָ֓ ֮ ׻֋ ָ פօ ָ ן ָ , ֮ ֮֕ןֵ ֲ֤ ׻֋, ֳ 9-10 ןֿ֟ , ׿ ־ã ֵ ־ã ׻֋ ׾ָ֓ ״֟ ™ ׳֮Ӥߵ

, ֮֮ߵ ӡ , ֮ ׸š ֮֕ן , ߵ ֮ , ֯ ֬ Ϥ ܵ ӡ , ֤ ׯ֔ פ ײֻ ֮ ָ ׻Ù ָ ֵ ֵ ָ , ָ ֕ ֮֯ ֮ ™ ײֻ ß , ֯ ־֮ ֤ ײֻ ֻ ֵ , " ֵ֤, ß ֵ֤" ־֟ , ײֻ

(ֳ֬ ( Ͽӟ ֙) ߚ߮ )

, ֮֟ ִֵ ײֻ ֮ ָ ? ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׯϵָ֮ ӿ ã֟ , ֲ ׮־֙ ׻֋ ׮Ե ׻ֵ ֵ , ֤ ָ֡ Ӳ׬֟ օ ꌿ֮ ײֻ ָ ֕֟ ־֋, ִ š , פ ׮֮ ֻ ֨ ֲָ , וִ ֵ ִֵ ֮ ָ, ™ , , ֮ ֕ ־ ֵ֤ ֳ ״ֻ, Ӳ׬֟ ׯ֔ ־ ֮ ֱ֟ ״ֻ ߅ ™ , ֟ ִ֟ ָ ־֮ ָ ֮־ָ ׸š ӡ ֮ , ָ ֲָ , ו ֯ ֮ ֟

, ֮֯ ֬ Ϥ ֮ ׮ֵֿ , þ֟ פ ֯ ֜ ֋ , ָӛ ֋ , ֋ , ֲ ֮ þ֟ օ (Contd. by 2G/AKA)

2g/1.30/aka-skc

ֻ (֟) : ֮֯ þֵ ֲ׌ Փֻ ֤ ֛ ֲ֤ ָ ֕ ֯ ß ׻֋ ֮֯ ֬ Ϥ ãׯ֟ ֮֯ ã֮ , ָ ֮ ׾ָ֓ օ

֮֯ ӿ֮ , ֿ ӿ֮ ֵ , ֮֯ ָ י , ׻֋ ִ֟ ֮֯ ֮ ׻ֵ ִ ךև ӿ֮ , פ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֿ , ֯ ֤ օ

ִ Ӳ׬֟ ֟ ָ ֮ ׾ָ֓ ֮ ؓ֟ ևֻ ֲ ֵ ָ ֯ ־֮ , ָ ֣ ֛ ևֻ ֲ ֣ ָ ׯ֔ 50, 100 ֮ ֟ , ֮ ָ ֮֮ ֻ , ׾ֵ ׾ ӓ ָ ֮ ϵ ֚ ִֵ ֯ ֜ ֮ - "A memorandum submitted to Shri P.V. Narasimha Rao, hon. Prime Minister of India, on International activities of the Indian Council for Indigenous and Tribal Peoples abroad and at the United Nations". 2 և, 1992 ֻ֟߮ Ϭ֮ ӡ, ֮֮ߵ ָ ־ פ ֵ memorandum ֲ ֜ ֛ ֵֿ ָ ֟ , , ֚ , ֟ ׾ ӓ ָ ֟ ! ָ memorandum ֜ , ָ ִ ֱ ֜ ָ ָ ׸š ӡ ֲ ֮֟ , ױ ֤ ֳ ׻֋ ֜ ֚ և ֮ פ , ִ ֋ "Whether the Government of India would recognise us as indigenous tribal peoples or not, we know, we still survive and exist as Adivasis, as distinct people, and at this UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations, we have come to express our unity and solidarity with indigenous people all over the world in our movement for liberation of indigenous peoples".

, ֜ ָ֬ ֟ , ָ ӳ߸ ׸ִָ ֟ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֕ ָ ֮֮ ֻ , ֟ ֻ , ׾ ֯ ֿ ֟ ֮ , ֟ ֮ ָ ׬

, ֣, Ӥ ֤ ֣ ֟, ֮֮ ִָ֓ ә ϵ indigenous peoples ִ ָ , ֣-֣ ™֤ ֮֮ ֻ֮ ֻ memorandum ֯ ִ֮ ֜ , ָ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ָ ֮֟ ֮ ֬ Ϥ , ֜ ֵ , ֻ ָߵ ִ ã, ֯ ֮ , memorandum ֻ֟߮ Ϭ֮ ӡ פ օ('2h/nb' ָ ָ)

HK-NB/2h/1.35

ֻ (֟) : ֟ ֟ ָ ׾ָ֓ ILO Ͽ ֤ ָ ֮־ ָ ָָ ֮ ֻ , ִ֤ ָ ָָ , ָ ֮ օ ֣ ֤ ֮֟ פ , 13 ֟Ӳָ և Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People ָ ֛ ָ ָ ֣ ֵ , ֯ ִ֮ ֟ , ָ ׻֋ ֮֟ ֟ "India" Chapter ׻ - "The text did not contain a definition of indigenous. The entire population of India was considered to be indigenous."

֮֮ߵ ֤õ, ֟ ֳ ֮ ׮־ - ָ , ָ ֤ ֵ ֋ ֤օ ־ , ׻֋ ֤ ֮֮ߵ ֤õ ֮֟ ֻ 18.12.2006 ֮֕֟ߵ ӡ Ͽ ָ ֤ ֵ ֲ - פ, ֮ ׻֋ ָָ ? ֵ֤ ֺ ôָ , ָ ֵ ָ ׾ֵ ָ ָ֮ ֵ , ֲ ֮ website , ֟ 18.12.2007 ןף ׻֋ ֵ , ֿ ֮ ֻ פ ִָ֮֬ ָ ״ֻ ֋օ š״ ֮ ӿ֮ ß ָ ָ ֮֮ߵ ӡ þָ , ֻ ׸ Act ֮֕ןֵ , , "tribal" ֲ ָ ֛֛ ֋, ־֮ ֣ ֮֯ "scheduled population" ׸ , ֳ ִ֮ ִ֟ ָ ֮֯ ӿ֮ ֮ "tribal" ֲ , ָ ָ ׾֮֬ "scheduled tribes" ׸ , ӟԟ ֮ ֻ ֤õ ֋, ֮ ӿ֮ ָ ֯ þָ , ִ֮ ֟ , ֻ ו֮ ְ , ֮ ֟ և , ׻֋ ֟ և ߅

Ӭ, ֟ և Declaration և , ֳ ָ ֟ ֮֮ ָߵ ִ֕ ֳ Ӭ, ׳֮ ֯ ׾ ׸֤ ӟָ™ߵ , ֻ֑ Ӭ , ִ, ן þ֟ӡ֟ ׻֋ ׻֤֮ ֻ , þ֟ӡ֟ ֮ ֮ ֮ ßֵ և ָ , ӟ , þ֟ӡ֟ ׻֋ ֮ ׻֤֮ פ ָ ֟ ִ Ӳ׬֟ , ִ֟ , ״ֻ և ֮֮ߵ ӡ

2J/VNK ָ ֿ:

-NB/VNK-KSK/2J/01.40

ֻ (֟) : ִ ֋, ָ ֮־ָ, פ 1857 ֤ ֵ

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (SHRI PRASANTA CHATTERJEE): There is another Member to speak. Your Party's time is 24 minutes.

SHRI SHREEGOPAL VYAS: I hope you will allow me. As you know, I hardly get an opportunity to speak and, I believe, you will give me a few minutes more.

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN: I am just informing you the total allotted time to your Party, which is 24 minutes.

ֻ : 1857 ֵ ֯ ֬ Ϥ ֮ , ױ ֬ Ϥ ִ ֯ ֟ , ןֵ ߻ , ֲֻ֯ ֮ Ծ֟ ןִ ӿ֕ , ֣ , ָӛ ײָ ӛ , ֜ ֵָ , ֣ ֲ ֮ ֮־ָ, פ ִ ׻֋ ׌֟ , ָ פ ݻ ׌ ֤ ֺ ֤ ֮ , פ ™ߵ ׾ֵ ֤ ֮ ־֮ , פ ֻ֯֟ ֤ ֤ ֛օ ֯ ָ , ֯ ִ ָ ׾ָ֓ ו֋ ֯ ד֟ ִ֟ , ׮Ե , ׾ ֬ Ϥ , ֮ ִֵ ֲ ֬ Ϥ ֻ֟߮ ߯ ޛ ָָ ִܵӡ ׾ ㌻ , ֲ ֟ ָ֮ , ֟ , ã֮, ָ ׾֡ ã֮ , ִԤ ִ , ֮ ׻֋ ך ֲֻ֯ ָ ָ ֮ Ӭ ֮ ׻֋ , Ͽ ֮ ֋, ֯ ֵ ׾ָ֓ ֺ ׸

, ֲ ײֻ , ֲ - ֟ օ ָ , Ӭ ִ ָ ד֡ ׾׾ֵֻ֪ , ׾֡ ã֮ , և ״ֻ֮ , ֟ ׻֋ ֕ þָ , , ִ ָ ״ֻ֮ ׾֡ ã֮ ָ ִ֮ ָ ׾׾ֵֻ֪ , Ӭ ִ ָ , , ֯ ֮֟ ָ þֵ ֮ ִ ו֮ ֮֕ן ִ ֮ ߾֮ ֵ, ׾׾ֵֻ֪ ָ ָ ִ օ ֟ ֮־ָ ӡ ָ , ֟ 76 ֋ ֟ ֵ ׾׾ֵֻ֪ ֮ , ָ ֋ ן ֓ , techno-economic comparison , ֯ , ׮־

, ָ ӿ֮ ..(־֮֬).. , ״֮֙ օ ָ ӿ֮ ֟ ָ ׾׳֮ ָ ֤ ׮ֵ׌ֵ Ͽ , ׸֟Ԯ ׻֋ ָ ޛ ֵ , ִ ֮ , ִ ָ , ָ ֯ ֋ ו ֯ , ֮ ׯ֔ ֋, ׻֋ as far as possible, people from Scheduled Tribes should be taken for all posts. פ ֮ ܵ ״ֻ֟ , ֲ ֯ ׾ָ֓ ׸, ֮ ׮־ ִ ֿ ӿ֮ ֯ ֮

֟ ִ֯ , , ֮֯ ׾׳֮ ӓֻ ֮ ֟ ֲ ׿ Ͽ ֟ ֮֮ߵ ӡ , ߇Ԇָ ׾ֵ ׿ ׻֋ ֻ, ֕ և ִֻ ֻ , ־֮ , פ ָ ױ ׿ ־ã , ָ ֯ ('2k/sc' ָ ָ)

SC-SK/1.45/2K

ֻ (֟) : ױ ׿ ֜ ֛, ו ֲ ֕ ֟ ָ ֟ ׿ Ӥ ֮ ָ ׾ֵ ֻ - ׿ , ־֮ , ϲӬ ׮־ ֯ ֲ ׿ ֟ ִ֬ Ͽ ֟ ֮֯ ן ֟ ֟ ׿ ִ֬ פ ֜և ָ ־ ָ ן, ָ ֳ֟, ָ ־ ָ - ֲ Ӿ ָ ֟ ׻֋ ֯ ׮־ ֯ ã֮ ָ ׮֋ ן, ֳ֟, ֮ ֤ ãׯ֟ ֵ ֯ ׮־ ֟ ֮ ֟ ִ֯ , ֯ ϵ ֮ ִ ִԤ ־֮ ֯ ִ ã֮ ָ ״׻֟ ױ ׮ִԟ ֛ - ֯ ִ ו֋, ֯ ־, ֛ , ֻ ִ ָ - ױ ׮ִԟ ױ ֮֟ ִ ֵ, ֯ ִ ִ ֮֓ ׾֡ ã֮ פ ֯ ӟ֟: ֮֟ ױ ֮֮ ׻֋ ֬ ֋ Ԯ, ָ ִԤ ֵ߅ ־֮ ֣Ԯ ֲ ָ ָֻ ׮Ե

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (SHRI PRASANTA CHATTERJEE): Please conclude. Twenty minutes have already passed.

ֻ : , ֯ ָ ֌ ָ ̻֕ ֤ ̻֕ ֟ ݵ ֕ ִ֮ ֮֮ߵ Ԯ ִ ֵ ֻ ߴ֤ ־֟ ߟ - ™ߵ ӣ - ֮ ֟ ִ֯ :

֡ ָ : ֡ ֣ ֮Ը:

֡ ׾ֵ֕ן֬Ծ֮ןִןִִ

(ִ֯)

߻ ן׸ () : ָ, ֯ ֮־֤ ֮֯ ֯ ײֻ ָ ֮ ָ פօ ָ, ײֻ פ ִ֣Ԯ ӡ ֬և -ִ ִ - פ Ӭ ևֻ ׮־֙߅ ֤ , þ פ ֲ ָ ֯ כÙ ֵ ևֻ ָ ֮ ֮, ֣ ֮ ֯ ָ , ֮֓-֮ - ֲ פ ן ̤ؕ ֮ ֵ օ ֌ כ , ֟ פ þֵ , ֮ פ ׸ָ ׻֋ פֵ ן ִ î , ן ֤ , ֣ ־֮ ߓ ֟ - פ օ ӡ ֯ ֬և ֡ ׾ ו פ ִ ß֮ ֮ ֟ , ֆ ֮ ֟ - פֵ ָ ֮ ׻֋, ָ ׻֋ ֮ ֻ֮ ָ ׿ֿ - ִ ָ ֮֯ ׮־֙ ִ "פ Ӭ ևֻ ׮־֙" օ ֌ , ָ֕ , ָ ֻ ֮ פֵ ֮֮ ־֮ ß֮ ָ - ٙ ֮ ֮֕ן ֟ ׾ֵ ֮֮ ֮֕ן ֟ ֌ ִֵ ָ , ײֻ ֮ ׻֋ ִֵ ֵ? ß ߮ ײ֮ ֻ օ ׮ֵ Ӭ ײֻ ֮ ׻֋, ׸ ׻֋ ׿ֿ ߅

(2-ߋ ָ ֟)

MCM-RSS/2L/1-50

߻ ן׸ (֟) : ָ ֈ ֕ ײֻ , ׻֋ ׮ֵ ֬և , ӡ ֬և ߅ ׮־֙ פ ִ , ׻֋ ֮־֤ ߅ ײֻ ߕ ؓ֟ ׾ֵ ײֻ ߤ ִ פֵ ־֮ֆ ֮ ֋ ֣ ׻֋ ָ ß ־֙ , ֻֻ ׮־֙ ֮ ֟ և 듵׸ Ù , ֓ ׮־֙ ֜ ׸֓ ֣ ֮ ֯ ִ ֮ ֯ ӣ֮ ߔ ֣ פ פ ִ ֮ ֟ , ָ ָ ֲָ ֟ , ֕߮ ֟ פ ֓ ֢ ֟ , ֜ ֟ ָ ߔ ֮ ׻֋ ֟ ָ ָ ׻֋ ִ֬ ׿ ֟ ֺ ֣ ׮־֙ ׸֓ ֟ ֯ ֟ ӡ ׮־ ִ ֤ ܵ פ Ù , ֲ ׻֋ ֮ ã ן ׻֋ ִ ֤ ևֻ Ù , ־ , әߕ , ֤ ו֮֟ ߴ֕ ևֻ ׻֋ ֟ , ߴ ׻֋ ָ֤ ײ֟ ֋ ָ ֮ ֯ ֜ ָ ׯ֮֔ ָ ִõ ִ֮֬ ֜ ָ ֣ ״ֻ ֻ - ָ ׸֓ Ù , ָ ָ׿֯ ׿֯ ־֮֬ ֮֯ , ӲӬ ׮־ ׸׸ Ù , Ԯ׻֙ ֻ , ֮ , ׻֋ ׿֯ ֯ ׻֋ ֕ ו֮֟ Ù ״ֻ ևֻ Ù ߓ ֱ ֮Ӥ ֟ , ֯ ֮֟ և0և00 ֙߿֮ ևֻ Ù ֟ ֲ Ù ֜և ֳ Ù և0և00 ֟ ָ ָ ֻ ևֻ Ù ׻֋ ֟ ֮ , ô֙ ֜ ֣ ָ ֲֻ ֮ ֯ ֲָָ ֮ ֤֕ ֮ ֻ ֤ ևֻ Ù ֮ ָ ֣ ֲָָ ? ָ ֣ ֲָָ ֮ ָ ׸׸ ֻ ׸׸ ֻ ׻֋ ״ֵ ֟ ֟ ׻֋ ֯ ׮־ Ù ֜ , Ԯ׻֙ , ׻֋ ֛ , և ָ, ִ -߮ ָ ֯ ֮ ֟ ִ ׮־֙ Ӥ ߛ׿ֵֻ Ù , ߛ׿ֵֻ (2m ָ ֿ:)

GS-TMV/1.55/2M

߻ ן׸ (֟) : ֯ ׮־ ֻ Ù ׻֋ - ևә ֯ ִ ֮ ߅ ׮־֙ Ӥ ֻ Ù ׻֋ ïֻ Ù ֯ ײֻ Ù ׻֋ ׾֮֕ , ֻ Ù 같, ֌׸ ִ֮ ֟ , ׻֋ Ӥ Ù ֮֮

ָ, ֻ Ù ֯-ֈ ֤ ևֻ ֻ Ù ֯-ֈ ֕ ֮ , ֻ 3.4 ָ ָ, ָ ָ֮ ֮ ָә , ֻ Ù ֻ 3.4 ָ ֯ ׮־֙ ֮֮ ֯ ײֻ ֜, ָӛ, , Ӭ Ϥ, ֕ã֮ ָ™, ָ ֲֵֻ ֤ , , ׾֬ ׻֋, ֮ ֮֜ ׻֋ ֯ ֮ ׻֋ ׮־ ֲֵֻ ן , כ֮ , כ֮ ֯ ׸֓ ֮ Ù ֓ ! Ù ߾֮ ׮־ ! ָ ߕ ֟ , ֯ ™ ֜և ևֻ ן , כ֮ , ָ ևֻ ׸ָ ָ֬֟: ֆ ֟ ו ָ ֋ י , ٣ ן, ָ ָ ãן Ù, ֯ ׻֋, ִ ָ ֆ ֮ ֮ ֟ , ֯ Ӥ וֵֻ֛ Ù ֆ ׻֋ ֮ ֆ ֯-ֈ ֆ ֯-ֈ ܵ ֮֙ ׻֋ ִ ׾֮֕ ֮ ָ, ײֻ ֮֯ ֆ ׸ϕ֮ פ כߕ֮ ֤ פ ֵ, Ùֱ ֻꌿ֮ ֲֵֻ ֤ ׸ϕ֮ פ ֵօ ָ, ײֻ adequate percentage of representation ߕ ֤ ִ ֵ ֻ ִ ִֵ , ֻ ߅ ׸־ , ָ ׻֋ ָ ߴ ָָ ֮֟ , ָ ָָ ָ ָָ , ָ ֤ ֮ ֟ , ָ ֮ ֟ , ָ ֳ ֮ ֟ ָ, ו ָ ָ , ֜ , ָ ֜ adequate percentage of representation in decision-making, ߕ ִ ֵ, ׻֋ ִ כߕ֮ ֤ ֯ Ùֱ ֻꌿ֮ decision-making , ִ ָ ïױ ֮ ָ, adequate ֻ, ָ ִ ֲֵֻ ֮

ָ, ֮֯ ߕֻ֮ ֟ ֕ , ָ ֲֵֻ ֤ ֮֯ , ָ ߕֻ֮ ֵ ߕֻ֮ Ӥ ևכֻ օ ָ, ߕֻ֮ ӲӬ , ׮־ , ֯ ־ ֲֵֻ ו֮ ֲֵֻ ׻֋ ֤ ִ , ֲֵֻ , ֙ ֲֵֻ ߛ և , ִ ו֮ ֲֵֻ ׻֋ ֤ ִ , ִ , ߕֻ֮ ִ

ָ, ָ ֟ ָ , ֛ , Bolangir, Koraput Ù , כÙ Ù , כÙ ֛ ֺ , ָ , ӡ ֈ ־ֲ פ ָ, ֯ ߕ ׮־ ָ , ֯ ָ ֮ ֯ ֲֵֻ ׮־֙ ߕֻ֮ ә , ָ , thickly ֲֵֻ ֯י כ̾ (2 ָ ָ)

 PREVIOUS HOUR