PREVIOUS HOUR

MP/3O/5.00

ֳ֯ן : , , ײֻ ....(־֮֬)...

ִ ֵָ : ֋, ֛ ӯ ևә

ֳ֯ן : , , ֯ ӯ ևә , ָ ׻֋ כ օ ....(־֮֬)...

ִ ֵָ : ֮։ , ֮։ ׻֋ ־ ֲ ֛ ؙ , ִ ֤ ֟ ֮ -߮ ָ ߻ ָ ָ Ϥ ָ֤֟ ֤ ֮։ ֟ , ݵָ Ӳָ ֵ֕ ָ Ӳָ ָ ָ ִ , ׮ֵ ׮ֵ ֤֤ ֤ ߮ ֜ פ ֲ ֮։ ݵָ Ӳָ ָ ֟ , ָ Ӳָ ֻ ֛ עֱ ֕ ָ Ӳָ ָ և , ̸....(־֮֬)....

ֻ ֤ : ֮֯ ־ פ , ֻ֟ ָ Ӳָ ָ ֛ և

ִ ֵָ : ֮ ־ פ , ׻֋, - ֮־֤

ֻ ֤ : ֟ ֕ ֯ ֟

ֳ֯ן : ֲ ֯ ִ ֵ , ֯ ִ֯ ו֋ ߕ̅ ....(־֮֬)... ֋,  ֮ , ֯ ָ ו֋ ...(־֮֬)...

ִ ֵָ : ֯ ָ ָ ֣ և ֙ ו֋օ ...(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : , , ֯ ָ , ֯ , ? ...(־֮֬)...

ִ ֵָ : ֯ ևә ֮ ? ֤ ֳ֯ן , ֯ ֣ ׸Ù ...(־֮֬)... ָ ֣ ֮ և ֜և և , ֮ ֜־ פ ֵ ..(־֮֬)... ̸ ֟ ׮֋, ֋, ֛ 1854 ֻ , Ӳև ֮ ֮ 1947 ֲ ֤֕ , ׸֛ ֮ և ֮ , ֮ ֛ ִ ֚ ֻ ׸֛ Ӥ, וִ ׬ӿ ֕ , Ӥ ֮ և ֮ ? ֯ ratio ׮ֻ ו֋ ӡ , ֯ ֯ ֛ ׬ָ և... , ׮ ו֋

ָ ֟ ָ ֟ ...(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : ָ ֟ ֯?

ִ ֵָ : ևә

ֳ֯ן : ևә օ

ִ ֵָ : , ... և ̻ ֮։ ֟ ָ Ӥ ֛ ֵ Ù֮ ֵ֮ ֋, פ ֤ և פ , ׮ִ֕߮ 㴲և 㴲և , ֤ , Ӧ , ָ ֟ ָ ׻֋ ̻ օ ֟ ָ ָ כ , ָ Ù֮ ָ ֲ ֤ ߛ , ߛ ֋ ֣ ־ ....(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : ֯ דֽ ׻ ֲ ևә?

ִ ֵָ : ևә ָ ׻ ݵָ ָ Ӳָ ֟ , ָ ׻ פ , , þ֟ ָ ֟, ־ ...(־֮֬)...

ֻ ֤ : ֯ ָ ֯ ֻܵ ֮ ָ Ӳָ ָ פ

ִ ֵָ : , ֯ ֮ ӟִ֕ ׻ֵ ֮֯, ֤ ....(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ևә ֵ, ֯ ִ֯ ו֋ ...(־֮֬)...

ִ ֵָ : ևә ևә ֮ ו֋ ֮։ ֻ Ù֮ , ֟ ָ ׻֋ ֟ ֟ ָ, ֤ ָ, ֙ Ù֮ ..(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : ׸ ӟ ֵ, ֯ ׻֋

ִ ֵָ : ִ ָ, ִ ә ִֵ ֟ ...(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : , ֯ ִ֯ ו֋ ..(־֮֬)...

ִ ֵָ : ָ ָ Ù֮ ֋, ֤ ֵ֤ ֟ ָ ֋ ָ ....(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : , , ֵօ ֯ ֮ דֽ ׻ ו֋ ...(־֮֬)...

ִ ֵָ : ָ, - ֮־֤ ֮֯ ֮ פ, ֱ ו֋, ֣ ֵ

(ִ֯)

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ִ, ֛, ֯ maximum և פ ֵ ׸ ӟ ֵ, ׻֋ (3P/ASC ָ )

-YSR/VKK/3p/5.05

SHRI TARINI KANTA ROY (WEST BENGAL): Thank you, Mr. Deputy Chairman. Sir, I rise to support this Railway Budget with some reservations. Sir, this year the Minister for Railways has placed a Budget with specific direction and the direction is privatisation of Railways. He declared that the Railways have constituted a Public-Private Partnership Cell since Railways want many more PPP schemes.

Sir, I do not know whether Laluji still remembers his speech dated September 10, 2004, when he had said that he would rather quit than allow privatisation in Railways. He further said that private sector would not meet the aspirations of people at large if the Railways were privatised, as the cost of operation and services would increase manifold. Sir, according to a recent PTI report dated January 6, 2007, the Railway Minister has said that the Indian Railways was in profit and he would never allow anyone to privatise this organisation. Sir, the same Laluji, in his Budget speech this year, proudly declared that the Railways have leased out catering and parcel services, invited private investment in wagon investment scheme, awarded licence to private parties for running container trains even when the turnover of the Container Corporation of India Limited is Rs.2,489 crores and the net profit is Rs.334 crores in 2006-07.

Sir, I recall that IRCTC in its 2000 Business Plan had declared that it would engage a consultant to prepare a plan for privatisation. That was during the NDA period. People of India refused to accept the policies of outsourcing of the NDA Government and brought the UPA Government in power. But, unfortunately, Laluji preferred to carry on the legacy of NDA in his current Budget proposal.

Sir, the result of recently concluded Assembly elections is a warning from the people. Can I ask, whether the Indian Railways is going to lose its monolithic character which it has been carrying since pre-Independence. Sir, like last year, this year too, there has been no increase in train fares. Over and above, a further reduction of Re.1 in daily ticket fare has been announced. This is welcome. But, Sir, at the same time, I am afraid that Laluji will definitely find out other ways and means to increase the earning of the Railways, as was done last year by renaming a number of trains as super-fast, increasing the charges for cancellation of tickets and increasing the fee for Tatkal reservation. Sir, I request the hon. Minister to let this House know how much the Railways have earned during 2005-06 on this account. Besides, technological advancement has not been reflected in the super-fast trains, which continue to run at a speed of 55 kilometres per hour. Express trains were upgraded to super-fast trains, but there is no change in the time-table which means it takes the same time as it took earlier to cover the distance. And still, passengers are being made to pay higher for the ticket, which defies logic. Sir, this Budget clearly could not live up to our expectations. (Contd. by RSS/3Q)

RSS/3q/5.10

SHRI TARINI KANTA ROY (CONTD.): In the previous Budget, 57 new trains were allocated, apart from extension of 37 train routes. This year, the number has come down to 32 and 23 respectively. And the Budget documents also reveal that despite last year's announcement, 10 new trains were not introduced, while extension was not done for 8 trains. I would like to know the cause and the time-frame for introduction of those trains.

Sir, the Railways have succeeded in increasing freight, but the same is not the case with coach and locomotive. Instead of setting up new units, the maximum utilization of the existing manufacturing units should have been the target. Sir, the Railway Minister has given some cosmetic touches to his Budget speech. He has proposed to increase the number of unreserved coaches in all trains, excepting fully AC trains and Jana Shatabadi Express. He has also proposed to raise the capacity of sleeper coaches from 72 to 84, AC chair car from 67 to 102, AC3-tier from 64 to 81, AC2-tier from 46 to 48 and AC 1 from 18-22. These proposals are welcome, but, at the same time, to implement them, the length of the existing platforms will have to be extended. I do not know how it will be made. Again, in almost all long distance trains, already passengers of 3-tier sleeper, AC coaches and unreserved coaches face long queue before the toilet, and there is inadequate supply of water. So, increasing berths and seats would make it an acute problem, and I believe, Laluji will also take care of these problems.

At the same time, Sir, we have seen in the Railways, passenger earnings have been increased. The target of the passenger earnings was for this year Rs. 2075 crores, which is higher than the last year's earning. But, in case of passenger amenities, I do not know what additional facilities were provided to the passengers during this time because the Railways have announced the last year as the year of customer service with a smile. But, our experience is, when we travel by a train, especially, I am talking about Guwahati Rajdhani, we see the quality of bed sheets becoming worse, pillows becoming smaller, and at the same time, the quality of food has also gone down when the price of food has increased. It should be taken care of.

Sir, the hon. Minister for Railways, in his Budget speech said, "Railway safety is our prime concern", and I hope, he will appreciate that the track renewals, level crossings and bridge works are important components of safety.

2006-07 is the last year of the 10th Five Year Plan, and here, we see the Railways failing to achieve its target. The target for new lines under the 10th Five Year Plan was 1310 kms., and the likely achievement is projected to be 945 kms, resulting in 365 kms. shortfall. Similarly, the doubling target was set at 1575 kms. and 1363 kms. is the likely achievement, which mean, the shortfall will be 212 kms. Even worse is the case with EMUs. The target for the 10th Plan was 1965 EMUs, and only 869 EMUs is the achievement.

(contd. by 3r)


-RSS/MKS/HMS/5.25/3R

SHRI TARINI KANTA ROY (CONTD.): In case of gauge conversion, we see that the allocation of Rs.1,300 crores was increased to Rs.1,901 crores in the Revised Estimates. The target was increased from 1100 kms. to 1225 kms. Unfortunately, the actual achievement, at the end of December, 2006, was just 548 kms.

Sir, in track renewals also, the budgetary allotment was Rs.2,922 crores. At the end, it was increased to Rs.3,418 crores. But the target was 4,000 kms. I do not know what is the cause behind it.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Please conclude now.

SHRI TARINI KANTA ROY: Sir, I am concluding.

I am coming to my own constituency area. Sir, I have seen that the Railway Minister addressed the safety issue in the other House, while answering Unstarred Question No.1466, on 30.11.2006. But, since then, we had seen Belakoba incident in West Bengal and the terrorist attack on the Samjhauta Express near Panipat.

Sir, I am sorry to point out that a huge quantity of Railways land remains unused for decades. The State Governments which have given lands, free of cost, to the Railways are demanding to use those vacant land stretches according to their needs, but the Railway Ministry has not agreed to this proposal. I think, the Railway Ministry will think about this matter.

Sir, West Bengal has been neglected in the matter of introducing new trains this year. Only one new train has been introduced between Howrah and Rampurhat. I am shocked to note that only Rs.55 crores have been allotted for the New Mainaguri-Jogighopa line, which is scheduled to be completed by 2011-12. I am afraid, it will take more than 15 years if so little allocation is made for this important line. As per the discussion and announcement, in a meeting held in November, 2005, at the Zonal Headquarters level, of NF Railway, the New Cooch Behar to Dhubri new line should be open for running of trains by the end of this year. I hope for timely implementation. (Time Bell) Sir, I want to make two or three points more. At the same time, I have put this demand several times that from New Jalpaiguri to New Alipurduar via New Cooch Behar, the main line should be doubled. But in the Budget proposals, nothing is mentioned about this.

At the end, Sir, I have raised, several times, the issue about the Haldibari-Mekhliganj-Changrabandha new project for which a survey was announced in the 2005-06 Budget. But, in this regard, not a single word is mentioned in the Budget speech. I would like to know the reason behind for not mentioning about daily running of train from New Cooch Behar to Sealdah, which was announced by the then Railway Minister, Mr. Nitish Kumar.

Gauge conversion works of North-East Railway zone should be expedited and the Ministry should speed up the work for the Alipurduar junction to Bamanhat line to be completed by the end of this year.

Sir, I am concluding with the assurances that are given, but the question is whether the promises are kept. Two years ago, we welcomed an assurance from the Railway Minister regarding granting licence to Railway hawkers. I am sorry to point out that the said assurance is yet to be fulfilled. The issue of commission vendors also failed to get the attention it deserved. Besides, all licensed porters should be absorbed in permanent employment through a process, and Supreme Court orders for absorption of workers formerly engaged in coal and ash and parcel handling work under contractors should be implemented.

Sir, from the very beginning, I tried to make some constructive criticism of the Railway Budget, 2006-07. I hope that the hon. Minister, Laluji, will give due importance to the demands of the common people and will take corrective steps in his reply. With this, I conclude, Sir.

(Ends) (Followed by TMV/3S)

-MKS-TMV-PSV/3S/5.20

SHRIMATI N. P. DURGA (ANDHRA PRADESH): Thank you very much, Sir, for giving me an opportunity to speak on the Railway Budget presented for the first year of the Eleventh Five Year Plan by the Railway Minister. This is a political Budget presented by the UPA Government due to the jolt it has got from the recent setbacks in Punjab and Uttarakhand. I am saying it as political, because the Budget is sharp in its short-term money making, moderate in medium-term strategy but very weak in long-term vision. This becomes clear if you look, for example, at the freight rates. In the Railway Budget, the Railways restructured its freight rates. While for users this means an increase in rates; the rates by themselves have not risen. The Minister himself has cleverly manoeuvred it from one classification to another classification which has pushed the rates higher. For example in 2004, the cost of transporting urea was Rs. 322 per tonne for 600 kms. This rose by 33 per cent, that is, to Rs. 430, in 2006. Or, take foodgrains, where railway earnings rose by 17 per cent between 2005-06 and 2006-07 from 56.33 paise per net tonne kilometre to 66.38 paise per net tonne kilometre. So, in real sense, the price of transporting goods by train has gone up.

This Budget is absolutely silent about investments. It is good that there is a proposal for dedicated freight corridor with an investment of Rs.60,000 crores, apart from building high-density networks, new electric loco works at Madhepura and the wagon bogie complex at Dalmia Nagar. You need Rs.60,000 crores for a new corridor and the Minister is harping on PPP. As we know, when stakes are in thousands of crores of rupees, factors like long-term viability, user charges, management control, fiscal incentives, speed of operations, return on investments come in, as these are not Rs.50 lakh or Rs.5 crore PPPs which the Railways has successfully implemented in catering services. The other point is, the world over, now, private sector is not too enthused about investing in ground infrastructure, as it just does not pay enough. So, how is the Minister planning to pool resources for this ambitious project? Nothing has been clearly said about this in the Budget.

Sir, last year the Minister introduced double stack container trains on diesel route. Now, he is introducing triple stack container trains without taking steps to sustain the axle-load factor. This may prove to be disastrous for the railways. Moreover, increased axle-load on account of a rise in the volume of traffic is violation of recommendations made by safety committees, as it compromises on safety and damage to the track. So, what is the reply of the Ministry to this? And, on the one hand, the successive Railway Ministers have been saying that they would not privatize any wing of Railways but, on the other hand, they are going ahead with privatization, giving the least importance to opposition from some of the major partners of UPA. You have already outsourced passenger reservation system, parcels, catering services, retiring rooms and yatri niwas. You have pushed container service to PPP by issuing 15 licences so far. And, now, you are inviting private partners for construction of dedicated corridors. My only plea is that it should be in the interest of the Railways, its employees and the nation, and not at the cost of these.

Sir, I, now, come to infrastructure. The Ministry is only looking at the volume and earning, but not looking at improving, at least, the basic infrastructure of the Railways. I just wish to give one or two examples. For more than three years, the Railways is dragging on equipping trains with Anti-Collision Devices to prevent accidents. The other basic important infrastructure is track. For everything we compare ourselves with China. It is always good that one should compare himself with the one who is better. In early 90s, China had only 58,000 kilometres of route track whereas we had 62,000 kilometres of route track. Now, China has 75,000 kilometres of route track and we are having 63,000 kilometres of route track. If you calculate, China has a 24 per cent growth rate to India's dismal one per cent. And, we are introducing more trains than China every year. Never in the history of Indian Railways has it ever laid 2,000 kilometres of broad gauge in one year!

(Contd. by VK/3T)

VK/3T/5.25

SHRIMATI N.P. DURGA (CONTD): How can you expect us to believe when the Railways say that it would lay 3,000 kms. next year, which is 300 per cent higher than China? It is nothing but misguiding the country, this august House and the people. The other point is, you have increased the number of coaches so as to carry more number of passengers, to earn more. But, have you ever thought of their convenience? Sir, now, the trains have 26 to 28 coaches. Since the platforms at bigger stations are longer, there is no problem for passengers to get down and board, as these platforms are able to cover the entire train. But, at medium and smaller stations, some coaches of these longer trains stop before reaching the platform and some coaches stop after the platform. As a result, passengers have to get down on the track which is a Herculean task for passengers. So, before taking initiative, at least, the basic infrastructure should be developed so that passengers do not face any problem.

I, now, come to safety and security. Sir, the less I speak about safety and security the better it would be. The bomb blasts in suburban trains in July, 2006, and February 18 Samjhauta Express fire accident remind us again about the safety and security of the Indian Railways. The Minister has allocated Rs. 5,500 crores only for the railway safety but nothing has been mentioned as to how much he is going to earmark for security. The Samjhauta fire accident is a big jolt to us. One of the main reasons for higher death toll in this accident is failure on the part of the driver as he stopped the train after 15 minutes of blasts and that too only after he was alerted by the Station Master at Diwana. It is also surprising how even the guard has not intimated the driver about the accident. The report says that the guard and the driver did not even have a walkie-talkie. I would like to know from the hon. Minister whether it is true. If yes, what are the reasons behind this? Why have you not provided them with walkie-talkie? Is it not a fact that Railways proposed to provide walkie-talkies to all drivers, stationmasters and guards as part of its security measures? Is it also true that guards and drivers of some trains do not have walkie-talkies? If yes, the reasons may be given and by when the Railways would provide handsets to all drivers and guards. The next point I wish to know from the hon. Minister is whether it is true that without valid passport and visa, tickets were issued to four to six passengers. If yes, what action have you taken against the officials concerned? The next point I wish to know from the hon. Minister is, is it true that on 3rd February, 2007, the Old Delhi Railway Station Master received a letter warning that blasts and terrorist strikes would be carried out in trains that start from Old Delhi Railway Station? If yes, what additional security measures have been taken by the Railways, in coordination with Delhi Police, to avert this accident? If not, what are the reasons behind not taking any special measures in spite of getting a threat letter? Sir, the Minister said in his Budget Speech and I quote, "In addition, equipments like CCTV and smart video cameras have been installed at sensitive stations." Sir, there are 18 CCTV cameras installed at the Old Delhi Railway Station. But, there is not even a single CCTV camera on platform No. 6 from where Samjhauta express departs. Is it not a sensitive platform? So, I request him to be more attentive and provide the latest gadgets at all the important stations.

The other important point on safety is coaches. The Indian Railway coaches are the most inflammable coaches in the world. And, the inflammable interiors of our coaches adds fuel to fire. The Railways has been working for quite sometime now to replace the inflammable coaches with fire-retardant coaches. This proposal has been gathering dust in the Rail Bhawan. Sir, I just give you an example of how sincere the Railways is towards the safety of passengers. The Railways entered into an agreement with the French National Railways, SNCF, to manufacture fire-retardant coaches which helps in slowing down fire, reduces toxicity that emanates from fire and gives passengers time to escape. The validity of this agreement, due to callous and casual approach of the Railways, has expired recently. I wish to know from the hon. Minister what are the reasons behind this? Who is responsible for this? Why is the Railways so casual on this which is meant for improving the efficiency and saving the lives of the people?

(THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P. J. KURIEN) IN THE CHAIR)

You may have any number of gadgets for the security of Railways, but if you do not have the personnel to operate them, they all become redundant. Just to give an example, there are 8,000 vacancies in the RPF. (Contd. By 3U)

RG/5.30/3U

SHRI N.P. DURGA (contd.): How can any one expect, with these many vacancies, particularly in the area of security, foolproof security of one of the world's largest railway network? So, I request the hon. Minister to have a time-bound plan and fill the vacancies immediately. The Minister said that he has allocated Rs. 5,500 crores for safety. But the statistics give a different picture. In 2004-05, there were 234 accidents. In 2005-06, there were 236 accidents, and according to unofficial reports, in 2006-07, they have gone up to 250. The same is the case with people who have been killed in accidents. The graph is going up. In 2004-05, 236 people were killed. In 2005-06, 315 people died, which includes 168 passengers. In 2006-07, the figure touched 350. So, where is all the money going? I only ask the Minister to have introspection about safety and security of Indian Railways.

Sir, I now come to electrification which is very important to achieve modernization of our Railways. Out of total 63,500 kms, we could electrify, in the last 60 years, only 18,000 kms. Nothing has been mentioned about how many kms. are going to be electrified in 2007-08. Not even a single kilometer has been taken up in the State of Andhra Pradesh.

Expansion of Railway network is an important thing, since Indian Railways is the cheapest mode of transportation in the country. Here, we are far better than China, where majority of its network is concentrated on the Western side. And, Indian Railway's track density is far better than China. China has 55.3 km per million as compared to

63.2 km in India. Of the 63,000 km, 16,000 km is yet to be converted into broad gauge and there is also a need to take up important sections so as to provide the cheapest mode of transport to our people. So, I request the Minister to take up projects of new lines, gauge conversion and doubling and meet the aspirations of the people.

Sir, I, now, wish to say something about my State which is for the third time unlucky. This time also 'Lalu train' did not stop at the Andhra Pradesh station. You may say that I am saying this because I am in the Opposition. It is not correct. Even the Andhra Pradesh Government is not happy with the Railway Budget. In fact, the Andhra Pradesh Government, ruled by the Congress (I) party, passed a Resolution in the State Assembly about the neglect of the State in the successive Railway Budgets and passed a unanimous Resolution. An all-party delegation also met the Prime Minister to express the feelings of the people of Andhra Pradesh that it had been neglected year in, year out. We had also submitted a Memorandum to the Prime Minister. I request the Minister to kindly consider the demands of Andhra Pradesh which are justified. Sir, Andhra Pradesh, next to Uttar Pradesh, is having the second largest broad gauge railway network to the extent of 4,890 kms. And, the South Central Railway, as a whole, has the third largest rail network among all the Zones. Even if you take the profit of around Rs. 45,000 crores income in 2006-07, the South Central Railway's share is Rs. 3,100 crores. It is nearly seven per cent of the total income. This year, the Railways is going to get Rs. 20,000 crores as profit. If you calculate proportionately, the South Central Railway should get 7 per cent as its share, which comes to Rs. 1350 crores. But, what we have got in this Budget is not even 40 per cent of what the South Central Railway is contributing to the Railway's profits. Sir, we are not begging. We are not making any unjustified demands. We are not giving losses to Railways. In fact, we are earning money for Railways. The Bhadrachalam-Kovvuru and the Nadikudi-Srikalahasti lines are pending for years together and screaming for funds. Nothing has been provided to these, including for Phase III of MMTS. What we have got in the successive Railway Budgets is nothing but neglect. Mr. Minister, you have extended Secunderabad-Vijayawada up to Guntur. How do you expect people to travel by this train which takes longer time and goes roundabout than the other trains from Secunderabad?

In this Budget, Andhra Pradesh has been given only one Garib Rath; two trains have been extended, only one train's frequency has been increased and only one line stretch, Jaggayyapeta-Mellacheruvu, has been identified for new line. (Continued by 3W)

3w/5.35/ks

SHRIMATI N. P. DURGA (CONTD.): Only one gauge conversion, Adilabad-Mudkhed, is proposed to be taken up. How far is it justified? Hence, I request the hon. Minister to kindly consider favourably the memorandum submitted by us to the Prime Minister and also the 13 proposals submitted by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. I am thankful to the hon. Minister for allocating Rs. 85 crores for Pakala-Dharmavaram gauge conversion. At the same time, I request him to consider releasing the remaining Rs. 191 crores so that this project could be completed as it will generate more revenue since it has more traffic.

Along with these, Sir, I have a few more requests for your kind consideration. Sir, there is a push-and-pull train between Bangalore and Bangarupet. I request you to kindly extend it up to Kuppam which is a very important place and there are many colleges, including a medical college. So, I request you to kindly extend this up to Kuppam. Next is, I request for the stoppage of the Madurai-Manmad Express and the Yashwantpur-Howrah Express at the Chittoor Station. I also request you to kindly extend the Padmavathi Express up to Chittoor. Then, electrification of Renigunta and Katpadi is going on at a snail's pace. Kindly provide sufficient resources to complete it in this financial year itself because in the absence of electrification, many trains are not able to ply on this route. Sir, there is a proposal to have a circular train to cover all the important pilgrim and tourist places in south India. I don't know what has happened to that proposal. I request the hon. Minister to consider this proposal also. (Time-bell) I will take two more minutes, Sir. The Railways are also proposing to set up 1,000 MW power project to meet its energy requirements. I request you to kindly set up that plant in Andrha Pradesh since it has got the necessary infrastructure. Sir, bio-diesel is one more area where Railways are doing something. Thousands of hectares of unused land that Railways have should be optimally utilized by planting more and more Jetropha plants and bio-diesel can be used to meeting its own energy needs. Hence, I request for planting of more and more bio-diesel plants in the wastelands of Railways.

Without speaking about passenger amenities, ïߓ ֵ֤ . Sir, I wholeheartedly welcome the move to reserve lower berths for senior citizens and women above 45 years of age. But, he has put a rider to it that if they travel alone, only then they are entitled for lower berths. Sir, I think, this is not fair. When you want to give, פ ו֋. So, my request is to remove this tab. It is good that the Railway Minister announced 1250 new coaches for the physically challenged. But, if you look at the basic amenities for them, they are miniscule. You have only one wheelchair at the New Delhi Railway Station. The other three are not working. The first point is that, with great difficulty, you get a wheelchair at the stations. The problem starts from then on. It starts from the coolie who demands a hefty amount. In the absence of ramps, the only way these passengers can reach the train is through the route taken to load goods and baggage which can take any amount of time and, moreover, the route is uncomfortable and dangerous as it entails even crossing the railway tracks. So, I sincerely request the hon. Minister to provide, at least, basic facilities to the physically challenged people. Sir, as far as cleanliness of Railways is concerned, be it at the stations, in trains, or at the platforms, we have to do a lot.

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P. J. KURIEN): Please conclude.

SHRIMATI N. P. DURGA: With littered platforms, shabby tracks, filthy and stinking toilets, stray vendors, lack of hygiene in pantry cars, it is horrible for a passenger to travel in train. So, I would only urge that utmost attention needs to be paid to cleanliness. It is good that the Minister has announced that he would take up another 300 stations this year and improve amenities at these stations and I also welcome the announcement declaring the year 2007 the `Cleanliness Year'. I hope that things would improve this year. I wish to know how many of the 225 stations are going to be provided with all the amenities in Andhra Pradesh and the number of stations going to be covered out of the proposed 300 stations in 2007-08.

So, Sir, these are some of the views which I thought that I should share with the hon. Railway Minister and urge him to sympathetically consider the requests made by me for the State of Andhra Pradesh. I once again request you, Sir, for having given me an opportunity to take part in the discussion on the Railway Budget for 2007-08. Thank you.

(Ends) (Followed by 3x/tdb)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Pp 563 Onwards will be issued as Supplement.

GS-TDB/3X/5.40

THE BUDGET (RAILWAYS), 2007-2008

&

RESOLUTION APPROVING RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED

IN FIFTH REPORT OF THE RAILWAY CONVENTION

COMMITTEE (2004) - (CONTD.)

ָ֕ ״ (ָ Ϥ) : ֳ֬ , ֮֯ ֕֙ ָ ֮ ׾ָ֓ ן , ׻֋ - ֮־֤ , ֟Դ֮ ӡ ֕֙ ß ֕֙ ß , ׾ ׮ֵӡ ӟԟ ֲ ֛ ֻ ִ ֳ 64 ָ ߙ ִև ֻ , ִ 4 66 ָ 337 ֻ כ , 43 ָ 858 ד֕ 8025 ӕ֮ ֣ 14 ԓָ ָ ߾֮ ֋ ןֵֿ׌ ߅ ָ֬ ӓ ӟԟ ֲ ֛ ָ֬ ӓ ָ ß , ׾ֳ ß ָ ׾ ׫ߵ ã֮ ֲ ָ ֓ ֻ֟ , ֕֙ ָ ֲ ֟ ֟ , þֳ׾ ֟ ֕֙ ִ֬ ָ Ӥ, Ӥ , ו ִ֮ ָ ־׸ ׾ָ֓ ֵ ָ ָ ֓ ֻ֟ ִ ֟ ֟և ֟ , ֻ֮ , "" ָ , ִֵ ֵ ֻ ֿ֟, ׮׿֟ ׾µ ֲ ӲӬ ׾ָ֓ , ֕֙ ß ָ ֵ ׮׿֟ ָ ߕ Ӥ ִ ߅ ֲ ™ ֕֙ ֟ , ֟ ӟ֮ , ߵ ӟ֮ ָ ָ ׸š ֵ֛ , ָ־ע , ֮ ֺ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ײָ ֻ ײָ, ָ Ϥ, ָӛ, ָ ָ , ו ָ ָ֮ ӡ ָ Ϥ ָ ָ ֮֟ ָ Ϥ , ֟ ָ Ϥ ֮ ִֵ , ו ָ ֙׸ ײ֔և և ß ֵ , ִ ׾ֿ , ֮֯ ן ָ ָ ֯ ϴ ãֻ , ߴ ãֻ , ײי ֟ ֮ ֮ ִ , ִ֬ ׿ֿ , ֋ , ָ Ϥ Ӥ ӛ Ӥӛ ָ , , ֲ ״ , ևخ ֻ ײֵ֔ ֋, ׮׿֟ ׾ ָ ָ Ϥ Ӥ, ֪ׯ , ו֮֟ ϳ־ ָ , ֮ ߙ , ֤ ָÙ ֻ, וֻ ֵֻܵ ד֟ , ָ ؓ֟ ־ֿ ָ Ϥ Ӥ ֮ ֺ ֮֮ߵ ӡ , ӛ (3և ָ ָ)

SC/5.45/3Y

ָ֕ ״ (֟) : ߸ , ߸ וֻ , וֻ , ? ӓ-֟ וֻ , ו֮ ׻֋ ָ֮ ־ ָ ֙ ײ֔և , ָ ׿ֿ ֋ ֤ օ , ָ ָֹ ֯ ֻ֟ ָֹ ֯ ֣ ֟ ߅ ֣ ױ ָ ֵ֯ ֯ ֟ ߅ ֣ פ ֵ ִ֟ ד֟ ָ ֣ ָ ִ֮ ֪ׯ ֤-֣ ֵ , ָ ֤ ָ פ ֋, ֮ ָ, ֲ֤ ֣ ֋ ֵ֤ ֤ , ִ ֤ ֛օ ָ ֲ ׾ָ֓ ֋ ֤ օ ָ Ϥ ײָ ָ֤֟ ֛-֛ ָ ׻֋ ֋ ֟ , ֲ֤ , ׾ִּֿ֯ , ֦ - ָ ֋ ִ֟ ϴ , ָ Ϥ ײָ ־׬ ֡ ֲֻ ͅ ֮-֮ ™ ׾ָ֓ ־ֿ ֮ ו֋, ֲ֤֤ ֮։ ֮ , ֲ֤֤ ָ ָ ֮ , ֲ֤ ֮ ֻ ֲָ֟ ӣָ ן ֻ֟ פ, ߮ פ ִֵ ֟ ָ ׾ָ֓ , ָÙ , ן ֻ֮ ֻ ׾ִּֿ֯ , ׾ִּֿ֯ ָ ׾ִּֿ֯-ֿ ׾֣֮ Ù֮ , ߻ӓֻ ֯ Ù֮ , ֟ , ׾ִּֿ֯ ִ֟ ߮-ָ ә Ӥ ָ פ ֋ ֛ ׾֬ ֋߅ ֲ ָ ֯ ׾ָ֓ ֤ օ ָ Ϥ ֟ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׾ָ֓ օ ײָ ֻ , ֱ ֻ֟ , ֙ , ӡ ָ ֮ -־ ָ ֻ , ָ פ ֵ ֯ע ָ ָ ֤ օ ָ Ϥ ָ ׾ָ֓ , ָ ׾ֿ ™ ־ ־ֿ , ־ ֮ ֟ ִ֟ ֤ ֵ㌟ օ ֮־ָ, ֕֙ ß ֵ , ֟ ָ ֵ֤ ֵ֤ ׻֋ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֬և ֮ ֺ , ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֮ ֕ Ӥ ו ׸ ָ֬ ָ ֵ ר ֱ , ֮ ֻ֟ ײ֟ פ - ֟ ׾׳֮ ׸ ֵ , ֙׸ ֬׮ ׻֋, ݮֻ ֬׮ ׻֋, ֬׮ וִ֮ ־ פ ֵ , ָ ֬׮ ֬׮ ָ ו ָ ן , ֮֮ ־ֿ , ԙ֋ ָ ֟ , ݮֻ Ù ו ָ , Ù ָ֬ ָ - ߕ ׸ִ ֮ ֱ ֺ ֵ , ֱ ֮ ֣-֣ , Ӥ , Ù Ù ָ֬ ָ ֬׮ , ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֮ ָ ײ֮ ֮֮ (3 ָ ֟)

MP-KLS/3z/5.50

ָ֕ ״ (֟) : ز֤ ֬׮ ָ֬ ָ Ù ֻ ׸֣ ֿ֟ ָ Ӳ ִֵ , ־֢ ãׯ֟ ֻ և þֺ ׮ִ

֮־ָ, ִֵ ֻ և ãן , ֻ ֡ ֻ ֤ ׸ ֚ ֤ ׸ ؓ֟ ׾ֵ ֻ ֤ ׸ , ׬ ֵ֜ , ؓ֟ ־ֿ ׻֋ ֮ ֱ ֵ, ֱ פ ָ ׬ ׬ ֮ ٕ֟ ֣ ֣ סֵ ׾֬ Ϥ֮ , ו destination ֮ , ׬׬ ֟ , ָ ־ã ӟԟ ֋, ִ֟ ֤ ֵ㌟ օ

֟ և ֋ ָ֜ և, ֵ , ֮־ָ, ֋ ָ֜ ֤ ׸־֮ ֕ ָ֜ , -יָ , ׸־֮ ֕ ָ֜ , ֮֯ י ֋ ָ֜ , ׸־֮ ֕ ָ֜ ֮֯ ֡ ׻ֵ ִ֮ ֡ ûָ߯ ֋, ֛ ֡ ֋օ Cancellation charges ֮֯ ֜ פ, ׻֋ ֮֯ օ ֡ Cancellation ׻֋ ֵ, ֕ ֜ ֋ ֮֯ ָ ׻ֵ? ׾֬ Ϥ֮ և? ׾֬ .. ֻ Ϥ֮ և, ׾֬ .. Ù ֠ ֻ Ϥ֮ և, bear , ֜֋ ֋, ָ֮ , וִ ׾֬ և , ֵ ֮ , ׻֋ , ָ֮ כ , ܵ ֜և և ױ ִ֮ ׌, ִ֮ ֡ ײ֮ ׸־֮ ֟ , , ؓ֟ ־ֿ ֮ ֮ ֵ ֙ פ , ָ֟: ֮ ֋ ֤ ׻ֵ ֮ "ָ߲ " ֻ , "ָ߲ " ִ , ָ ߿֮ ִ ֮ ֋? ִ ֲ ֮ և, ֳ "ָ߲ " ֻꅠ "ָ߲ " ׯ֔ ָ ָ , ֮ ָ ֚ , ָ ? ֮? ׾ָ֓ ׾ֵ ...(־֮֬)...

SHRI R. VELU : Four have been started.

ָ֕ ״ : ֮ ֯ , ֮ ֵ֟օ þָ ָ֮ ׾׳֮ ִָ֓-֡ ִ֬ ־ ִ֬ ָ֮ ֯ , Ù֙ "ָ߲ " ָ߲ ֤ ֮ ֻ ֋, ֤ ã֮ ֯ , ֡ ׾֮֬֕۠ , ָ֮ כ , , ־ֿ ֤ , ֜֋ ֮ ֺ

֮־ָ, ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֮ ֮ ߕ ָ ֛ פ - ׾֬ օ ִֵ סֵ ׾֬ Ϥ֮ , ֡ ֟ ׻֋ ׿ֿ ֣-֣ ֡ ֻ֟ 9000 כ , סֵ Ϥ֮ - ֟ ߅ ֮־ָ, ӟԟ ֻ֮ ֻ ֡ ־ ֻ ֟ , ָ ־ ֻ, ׸ָ ֮ ֯ ֋ ֋? (4A/ASC ָ ֿ:)

ASC-SSS/4A/5.55

ָ֕ ״ (֟) : ֕ ָ ֙֋ , ֤֟ ֙֋ ׾ ׬ӿ ֳ ϴ ϲӬ֮ ־ã ָ֬ ָ ֤֟ ֙ֆ ֱ֟ ֯ ָ ָ ϲӬ֮ , ֟ ָ ӡ ϲӬ֮ þֵ ֛ ܵן ֯ ϲӬ֮ ֛ ִ ֛ ׾׾ֵֻ֪ ֓ ϲӬ֮ ֟ ֟ ִָ֓֡ ִ֬ ֟ ϲӬ֮ ״ֵ և, ֵֿ ֺ ֤֟ ֙֋ , ׾ñ ״ֻ , ִ֕߾ ֯ ֯ Ӥ ׾ñ , 㴲և Ӥ ִ Ù , ִ ֯ ִ Ù , ֲ֤֤ ִ Ù , ֙֋ ֙ , ױ ֵ ϲӬ֮ , ָ ֮ ־ֿ ֤֟ ׾ñ ֙ֆ ֻ פ ֙֋ ֕ Ӥ ֡ ֮ ֟ ӓ-֟ פ ֤ ָ ָ Ӥ ֛ ևԅ ִ סֵ ָ-ߙ ֵ ִ֮ ߮ ֵօ ִָ ֙ և ׻ , ߙ ָ߲ ִ֮ ֮ ֚ ֻ֟ , ־׬ ϟכ ־ã ? ֡ ֻ֟ , ӟ׸ ־ã ? ؓ֟ ־ֿ ׻֋ ׾׳֮ ָ ־ã և ־ã ߠ ֟ և , ׻֋ ֕ 67 ָ ָߋ ԓָ 1450 3700 כ ߆ָ ־֮ ֌׸ ֮ ֳ ߮ ָ ־֮ ָ ߮ ָ ־ã , ו ָ ֟ ־ã և , ׻֋ ׿ֿ ָ ִԟ ֟ י ֡ ָ ֮ ֮ؓ֟ ֡ ֟ ֟ ֻ֟ ָ פ ֮ؓ֟ , 9500 פ ֻ֟ , ִ֟ ִ ִ 4500 Ù֮ 7130 Ӿֿ߻ Ù֮ 178 detector, ֻ 140 , ִ ׾ָ ß ֻ ߙ߾ ָ Ùa ֻ 41 ו ֮֮ߵ ֤ ߴ֟ ܵ 190 ֣ ֻ , ו֮ ֣ ׻ , detecetor ֻ 1200 , ֲ ָ ãן ֟ ֟ ֌׸ ָ ִϟ ׾ָ֓ , ׻֙ ָ ׾ָ֓ ׾ָ֓ ־ , ׻֋ ֮ ֮ ֛ ָ֬ ӓ ו ָ ֻ״֟ , ָ ָ כ ׾ָ֓ , ֛ ָ֟ ֟ ׻֋ ָ ֙֋ י ֙֋ י ֛ ָ , ׻֋ פ ׮׿ִֺ ׾ָ֓

(4B/NB ָ ֿ:)

NB/NBR/4B/6.00

ָ֕ ״ (֟) : 1969 ֲ þ ִ ״׮Ù , ִֵ ָ ֓ ߅ ֮և ִ 韾 , ׮ ׮ֻ פ , ִ ־ã ױ ָ ֮ ָ ׾ָ֓ RPF ָ ֟ ָ ֮ ָ ־ã֟ ֋, ־ã ָ ֋, ֻ֮ - terrorist activities ֻ ָ ָ ֻ֮ ֛, ו ָ֬ ָ Ӥ סֵ ָ֮ ֟ , ןֵ ֻ ֟ , ߮֯֙ , ִ ָ , ִ֟ ֳ օ

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIEN): Mr. Mishra, can you yield for a minute? The Finance Minister wants to lay Supplementary Demands for Grants (General) on the Table.

SUPPLEMENTARY DEMANDS FOR GRANTS (GENERAL), 2006-07

THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR FINANCE (SHRI PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL): Sir, with your permission, I lay on the Table a statement (in English and Hindi) showing the Supplementary Demands for Grants (General) for the year 2006-07 (Third Batch). (Ends)

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIEN): How many more minutes will you take, Mr. Mishra? You have already taken more than twenty minutes.

ָ֕ ״ : ֮ ֮ ?

ֳ֬ : ֯ ֱ , I want you to control yourself.

THE BUDGET (RAILWAYS), 2007-2008

&

GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION RE: RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE FIFTH REPORT OF THE RAILWAY CONVENTION COMMITTEE (2004) -- CONTD.

 

ָ֕ ״ : ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֮ ֮ ԙ֋ , ׾ֳ ״ֻ , ִ , ָ֬ ָ ӡ ֟ ָ֬ ָ ֵ֟ ԙֆ 2004-05 ֟ 0.29 ֙ 0.28 ֵ ִָ֯ ָ ԙ כ ֮ ֙ֆ ר 2004-05 ִָ֯ ָ ԙ֋ 70 , 2005-06 75 ԙ֋ , 2004-05 ֮ ֙֋ 10 , 2005-06 ֮ ֙֋ 15 , ԙֆ ֵֻ ܵ ֱ ר 2004-05 ܵ 50 , 2005-06 ܵ 168 , 2004-05 ֵֻ ܵ 191 , 2004-05 ֵֻ ܵ 483 ֮֮ߵ ӡ , ֟ ֮֟ , ֋ , ׾ֳ ָ פ ֋ , ָ ֟ כ ִ , ֮ ־ֿ ָ ֮־ָ ӡ ָ ֟ և ԙֆ ֮ ԙֆ ׻֋, ־ã ֮֮ ־ֿ ׻֋ ׸ ֟ ֟ , ׸ ӟԟ ָ ߕ և , ֮ ֺ

ֳ֬ , ֮֮ߵ ӡ ׯ֔ ֛ ֋ ־ , ׯ֋, ָ ֵ, ֌ ֛ ֣ ־ ײ ֵ Ù ֻ , ֵ ֮ , ֲֵ ֋ Ù ֻ ױ ו̸ ֋ ֱ ֋ ֵ ֱ ֤ ִ ׮ٴ֟ ֛ ֵ - ֤ , ׻ֵ , ֲֵ, ֟ ֟օ ו֮֟ ߕ և , ־ ֻ֟ , ֮֟ օ ־ֿ , סֵ ֛ ׾֬ , ָ benches

4C/HMS ָ ֿ:

PREVIOUS HOUR