PREVIOUS

KSK/2.00/1t

The House re-assembled after lunch at two of the clock.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN in the Chair.

***

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Mr. Naik, I have gone through the records and the allegation is of personal nature. Under the rules, it is not permissible. I request you to withdraw this.

ִָ֮ ֵ : ָ, ֯ , ׮Ե ו֋

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ׸Ù ֯ withdraw ו֋

SHRI SHANTARAM LAXMAN NAIK: Okay, Sir. But, let this be a proper precedent so that in future...(Interruptions).

ֳ֯ן : precedent ֵ !

SHRI SHANTARAM LAXMAN NAIK: No, I want it to be a precedent...(Interruptions).

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Naikji, let us discuss the issue. The whole nation is watching us how we discuss price rise.

SHRI SHANTARAM LAXMAN NAIK: My whole intention was that Congress Party, as I said, we were not only born because of politics. If you see the history, we were born to answer the questions of poverty, hunger, and disease in this country. Politics came later on. We became a political party much later. These were the issues that we took unlike any other party which has been born as a political party. That is the difference, Sir. I would say that nobody should shed crocodile tears. I know people are very happy that some traders are getting benefit. Some people are very happy. So, they should not shed crocodile tears. We know the things. Secondly, Sir, we have to consider that as far as prices are concerned, factor of increasing oil prices is a very important factor which contributes in price rise and which is not in our hands and who dismantled, rightly or wrongly, the whole earlier system, as a result of which now every increase abroad in oil prices is followed by an increase in local prices. Now, dismantling was done by the BJP and they cannot run way from this concern. Then, Sir, question of selling oil at a higher price is one issue. When there was scam of petrol pumps itself; petrol pumps were sold in a very....(Interruptions). What I am saying is that when they are talking of increase in oil prices, we have to speak of petrol pumps also and petrol pump scam plays a very important role.

SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Then, you should discuss food-for-oil programme...(Interrutpions). Food for Oil Coupon, ֯ ָ ? ֯ ֻ ֮ ָ , ֻ, ֯ ֮ ״ֻ !

ֳ֯ן : ֵ֛ , ֲ ֋, ֲ ָ ׻֋օ

SHRI SHANTARAM LAXMAN NAIK: Sir, how can he forget petrol pumps? So, we have to go to that story where petrol pumps were auctioned. You cannot run away from that. Then, Sir, Congress Party Government holds a record of having performed well in mid-1990s when inflation was less than five per cent. Nobody in this country has achieved such a miracle in the history of this country and, therefore, this is the Congress Party which has achieved this. It is only when BJP's shadow fell on South Block that things started deteriorating. Today, if you see the history of price rise after mid-90s, when their shadow fell on the South Block...(Interruptions)... and on North Block....(Interruptions). Therefore, we have got a track record of performing well. The question is that we have to see that hoarding and black-marketing is stopped; it is controlled. And, those who are involved in hoarding and black-marketing, in however high position they may be, whoever may be their protege, we should catch them. (continued by 1u)

GSP-HMS/1U/2.05

SHRI SHANTARAM LAXMAN NAIK (CONTD.): Therefore, stringent laws should be made and we should ensure that nobody, from any quarter, opposes when such stringent laws are enforced or when essential commodities laws are enforced. We have to see who are the persons who get up and oppose such legislation and such orders. At that time, things will be exposed but it is very essential.

Sir, the Government has taken certain measures as a part of its strategy to control prices. For example, 35 lakh tonnes of wheat is being imported, 42 lakh tonnes of free sale of sugar for the quarter from April to June, 2006 was made available, Customs duty on import of pulses was reduced to zero on June 8, 2006 and permits have been given to private traders to import wheat at reduced duty of five per cent.

Sir, these are some of the measures which are being taken. In spite of these things, I would appeal to the Government of India that with regard to essential commodities -- may not be to the extent that we were enforcing in earlier time but to some extent -- and, if the Chief Ministers are asking for some teeth, for some powers to control hoarding of essential commodities, these things should be considered. Thank you very much.

(Ends)

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT (WEST BENGAL): Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, I thank you for giving me this opportunity to express the views of my Party on this very important subject. Sir, I heard with great interest and concentration also, not being diverted by the rhetorical flourishes, Mr. Venkaiah Naidu's speech on this, and, also the points which have been made by the Ruling Party. (Interruptions) Sorry, is there any problem here? I think, the Samajwadi Party was supposed to speak. Would you like me to yield and ask him to speak, or, can I continue?

ֳ֯ן : ֮־ָ ֻ , ֯ ֮ ֤ ?

֮־ָ ֻ ֻ : ֯ ֮ ו֋, ֤ օ

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: Thank you very much. The point that I would like to make at the outset is that this whole issue of rising prices, skyrocketing prices is directly related to a particular framework of policies, within the neo-liberal framework. And as far as that is concerned, we find that there is a similarity in the policies followed by the NDA Government and the current policies being followed by the UPA Government. Sir, it was exactly the same position earlier, and, that is where I would request Mr. Venkaiah Naidu not to distort what has happened in the past but look at the records even of Parliament. Sir, exactly the same speeches which are made by him today were made by the Congress Leaders at that time when they were in the Opposition and you were in the Ruling Party. Today, you have just changed position as far as rising prices are concerned. But there are those who have remained consistent. Consistent, why? Consistent, because we are not bothered about who is sitting in power and who is not. There is the consistency which is driven by a commitment to defend the interest of the massive people in this country, and, it is precisely for this reason that the language that we spoke in Parliament when the NDA was in power, the language that we spoke on the streets when the NDA was in power, is exactly the same language that we are speaking today in Parliament when the UPA is in power, whether it is in Parliament, whether it is in the Coordination Committee or whether it is on the streets of this country. Why is it, Sir? It is so because rising prices are determined very clearly by the retreat of the Government from its very basic commitment, duty and responsibility to defend the minimum requirements of the people of this country. (Contd. by 1W-sk)

SK-PSV/2W/2.10

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT (CONTD.): We have also heard a lot, I am sorry that I have to start this speech by responding to what Mr. Venkaiah Naidu has said. But, I found some of the comments quite offensive. I mean, we have heard a lot about barking and biting and who bites in the morning and who bites at night and who barks in the afternoon and so on and so forth. What we are really concerned with, and, I think, Mr. Venkaiah Naidu will also appreciate that being committed to the parliamentary system of governance that is the bite of the janta. They have already experienced it in 2004. They have not learnt. In the last five State Assembly elections, the bite of the janta ensured that the BJP lost its deposits in most of the seats where its candidates stood. But, they have not learnt. ֤ߵ ֕֯ ïꌙ , ͕͟ ֟ 000 respect ߕ ...(־֮֬)... ־ֻ 000 ׮Ù ֮ ֮ , ֮֟ ִ֣Ԯ ֻ ֻ ׸ -- ֤ פ ֵ , ָ ֟ , lessons , -- ֕֯ ֟ ׮Ù , ... So, therefore, the point is, as far as duplicity is concerned, Sir, the duplicity lies when you are in Government, you adopt a policy, adopt one language and when you come into Opposition, you do exactly the opposite, but, the policy remains the same. Today, in this short intervention on rising prices, the main focus that I want to make is precisely on those three or four major policies which are required to be changed. The first point when we talk about rising prices, Sir, we have to understand that, and, I think, we know that, but I want to stress this point that one of the calculations of poverty is how much of a family's income is spent just to meet its food requirements. After all, we talk about the quality of life. Today, 95 per cent of this country are in the unorganised sector, the labour force. Therefore, I am earning a daily wage for which there are no laws today. If I get work, I may earn 15 rupees, I may earn 20 rupees. If, for a family of five, I have to spend 11 rupees or 12 rupees for one kilo aata, 98 per cent of what I am earning is spent on food. So, generally, throughout the world, one of the measurements of poverty is how much does a family spend on its food requirements. Now, Chidambaramji is here, we are hearing so many great examples that he is following the American path. But, I am sure he knows that one of the measurements in America is that if one-third of your family budget is spent on food, you are considered poor. In our country, if that standard is taken, 93 or 94 per cent of our people would be poor, not 26 per cent which these fudged statistics are showing. But, even going by those statistics, today, nine out of ten families in rural India and seven out of ten families in urban India are spending 60 per cent of their budget on food requirements. And, that is not to say those food requirement are met or that they are getting 2,400 calories a day which is the minimum which is required. But, this is the amount that is spent just on food. It is precisely because so much of the money which is earned by the massive people is spent on this minimum requirement, that Government's responsibility becomes even more important. And, it is there, Sir, where the cruelty of the neo liberal framework, the cruelty of a Budget which cuts down on food subsidy, the cruelty of a Ministry, when prices are rising, brings out a draft recommendation which is actually going to be considered by the Cabinet to cut APL/BPL quotas, to increase prices in the ration grains and to cut down the requirements in the name of the APL, I am going to come to that. What I am saying is that in a situation where our people require Government's support to meet the very basic needs for human survival, which is food, in such a situation, the UPA Government, following faithfully the footsteps one by one set by the NDA Government, is doing precisely the same thing. (Contd. by 1X/YSR)

-SK/YSR/2.15/1x

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT (CONTD.): We know what its impact is. I work among women. I know what food insecurity means. He is talking about gas. How many people use it? Of course, I am happy that this Government -- maybe, there may be some small influence from the Left -- unlike the NDA, at least, has not increased the price of cooking gas. But I tell you, Sir, today it is a matter of shame to this country. UNICEF says that 50 per cent of our children are malnourished. See the figures of women's anaemia and weakness. It is not for natural reasons; it is because they do not get a balanced diet or proper nourishment. Due tothe impact of food insecurity, there is rise in trafficking, and more and more women are selling their bodies just to meet their families' food requirements. This is the symbol of neo-liberal policies, and that is why the issue of rising prices has to be of concern to all sections of this House regardless of the party to which we belong.

One of the reasons for this dismal situation is the five times hike in petrol and diesel prices. As far as my party is concerned, we know that international oil prices are going up. We are very well aware of it. But what did we say to Mr. Chidambaram and his colleagues? International prices of oil are going up, but why do you want to conceal the fact that you are benefited from international prices going up by your framework of duties and taxes? Out of every one rupee, Sir, which we are expected to pay for petrol, 55 per cent of that is tax. Of which, the largest share is that of the Central Government, followed by the State Governments. It is a fact with regard to the State Governments also. But the largest share is of the Central Government. We have given a note to this Government. We have shown to them how when prices are going up, and they are burdening the common people, the net increase in their revenues has been Rs.38,000 crore. Because every time the international price goes up, automatically, the Government's income through the tax structure also goes up. At present, the Government's revenues from increased prices is Rs.1,26,000 crore. We told this Government that you cut your duties, you cut your taxes, and save the common man and women from the burden. But what have they said? "Ask the State Governments to do it." That defies logic. We have said that we are prepared to do it. You first cut your taxes; you cut your duties; you bring it down and save the common man from the burden, and undoubtedly, the State Governments will follow suit. But you have refused to do it.

Therefore, the first demand that we make is this. We want the Government to answer this. The Left has given a note to the Government, which is based on the facts and which is based on logic. Will the Government respond to that? Is the Government prepared to take the sense of this House and reverse its totally anti-people five times hike of diesel and petrol prices?

The second point I want to make, which has been made by my previous speakers, is that when prices are rising, certainly we have to look and see what are the measures that are immediately required to protect the poor from this. And one very important measure, which always has been, and we have been proud of it in India, is our strong Public Distribution System. We have seen, it is precisely the Public Distribution System which has afforded some relief to the people as far as food security is concerned.

Under the NDA Government, we have seen the most dreadful, dismal situation of six crore tonnes of foodgrains rotting in godowns, while people of this country were starving and then it exported it. They did not want to give it to the BPL families at lower price, but they gave it to foreign traders at Rs.4 a kilo, while BPL families were not even given that much. We know what their record was. What we want to say is that it should prevent itself from following the disastrous food policies of the NDA Government. This Government has a commitment in its Common Minimum Programme to strengthen the Public Distribution System. (Contd. by VKK/1y)

VKK/1y/2.20

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT (CONTD.): What do we find? The total and utter mishandling of wheat and the procurement policy. I have raised this before on the floor of the House and I am sorry to say that this Government has failed utterly to give any convincing answer. First of all, they put the target of procurement only at 16 million tonnes. It's not that wheat production has fallen drastically. It's stagnating. We know it's stagnating. We are concerned about it. We ask this Government, give up your export-oriented drive in which you only want to export to save your foreign exchange and you don't bother about the food security of this country. We have told them that. So, production of foodgrains is a very important point. I am not going into those details. But what about procurement? What have they done? It is precisely because they have a pro-big trader policy. They have removed all the restrictions which were there in the Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. They have allowed big traders including foreign traders to go anywhere in the country to procure wheat. They deliberately keep their own procurement price down so as to encourage the farmers and leave them with no choice but to sell to the big traders. And then, Sir, having done that, they destroy the Public Distribution System by huge slashes in wheat allocations. I want to draw the attention of the House to this. It has never come here, but I want to tell you the latest figures which are given about monthly allocation. In the Antyodaya, that is, Rs.2 per kilogram, which you are supposed to give to Antyodaya families, the monthly allocation is slashed from 2.81 lakh tonnes to 2.55 lakh tonnes. Who has given them permission to do this? Where have they discussed this? The BPL allocation is slashed from 5.25 lakh tonnes to 4.46 lakh tonnes. And as far as APL is concerned, they have slashed it from 15 lakh tonnes to 1.94 lakh tonnes. In other words, the entire PDS is being destroyed systematically and one of the main reasons -- the links between low procurement and slashing wheat quotas -- is precisely because this Government wants to retreat from its basic responsibility of providing food security to the people of this country.

The second aspect of this is, they say, they are giving compensatory rice quotas. Where did you have these discussions? Have you discussed it with the State Governments? Have you discussed it here in Parliament? So, clandestinely, they are, in any case, destroying the Public Distribution System at a time when the basic demand has to be, to strengthen the Public Distribution System. In that, Sir, we have been constantly saying, universalise the system, give up these BPL and APL business because in the name of APL, what you are actually doing is, you are dividing the poor because of the vague statistical manipulations to identify BPL. Again and Again, we have raised it in this House. Shri Sharad Pawarji gave us an assurance that they are going to set up a committee along with the MPs in which we can look at this. They have not done it. But, in the meanwhile, saying that there is a very poor offtake from APL, they have actually drastically reduced the rights of the APL cardholders where, in fact, those APL cardholders are those who earn more than Rs.311 a month.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: How much more time will you take?

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: Sir, I will take five or ten minutes.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Your time is over.

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: Sir, I will just finish. I have two more points to make. So, our demand is, strengthen the Public Distribution System and include other essential commodities. Why can't you include dal? We know what this Government's policy is. Sir, successive Governments have absolutely neglected the production of pulses in this country. In the last 30 years, production of pulses increased from 10 million tonnes to 15 million tonnes. This is the result of your food policy. Five million tonnes' increase in 30 years in the production of pulses in this country! This is the situation. It's pathetic. It's the neglect of the most important source of protein, dal or pulses. This is the situation. Therefore, what we are demanding is that oil, dal and other essential commodities must be included in the Public Distribution System so as to afford some minimum relief to the people of this country.

The third point I want to make, Sir, is the whole issue of future trade. We have raised it with this Government and we know how today, following the NDA, again I will say, we have some regulations, we had a law, Sir, to ensure that essential commodities are banned from future trade. (Contd. by MKS/1z)

MKS/SCH/2.25/1Z

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT (CONTD.): It is the NDA Government which lifted that ban; 90 commodities were included, including the essential commodities, in future trading. And we know today how there is a huge expansion of speculative capital in the future trading market. When we raised it with the Government, they said, "No, no; farmers will benefit." How farmers are going to benefit? You just take one example of wheat. Last year, they had a future contract for three months; the price at the end of that was around Rs.680/-. One year later, what is it? It has gone up to Rs.900/-. So, what is happening is, the speculative manipulations of essential commodities in future trading markets which were allowed by the BJP-led NDA Government are causing havoc with prices of essential commodities. And it is essential that we have a ban on essential commodities in future trading. Sir, even in organisations like UNCTAD, as he said, we have future trading. But keep essential commodities out of it, and we have done it, so far, in this country. But so pushed we are to encourage speculative capital, you want to increase profits without adding a single productive asset to this country's wealth. We want to allow them to have profit on this. Therefore, a very important demand today, when we talk about price-rise, is to ban future trading in essential commodities and to reverse what the BJP Government has done.

And, lastly, on the Essential Commodities Act, once again, I have to say that there were two decisions taken by the NDA Government. One was to reduce the list of essential commodities under the Essential Commodities Act. They brought it down from 79 to 50. So, that was one big blow to ensure some kind of security against the rising prices. The second thing they did, by another Government notification, was to remove all restrictions on the amount of stock any trader could keep. No restriction on movement, no restriction on stocks, no restriction when you have to bring them into the open market. In other words, that was a licence for hoarding. And that is one of the reasons why (a) the Government procurement has gone down; (b) a big portion of the stock has been ...(Interruptions)...

ֵ֮ ֻ ָ: ֯ ...(־֮֬)

ֳ֯ן: ֵ֮ ֻ ֯ և

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: (b) a big portion of the stock has been hoarded by big traders who are not bringing it into the open market, and (c) the Government is going along with the very bad policy decision. ...(Interruptions)... Sir, that is bound to happen. When you say something, it hurts them, Sir. I don't mind them whether they are biting or * . What they are doing, I don't have any objection to that. So, Sir, let them continue, but the point that I want to make, Sir, is.....(Interruptions)... and what I want to ask the Finance Minister today is, since the Congress Party itself.....(Interruptions)...

ִ֤ Ͼֻ: ֳ֯ן , ....(־֮֬)

---------------------------------------------------

*Expunged as ordered by the Chair.

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: I am not yielding, Sir. I am sorry, I am not yielding, Sir. ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI RAMDAS AGARWAL: Just for a second, Shrimati Brinda Karatji.

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: I am not yeilding.

SHRI RAMDAS AGARWAL: You cannot use the word * in the Parliament. You cannot use the word * ...(Interruptions)... You have used it. ...(Interruptions)...

ֳ֯ן: (*) ֲ ׸ ו֋ ...(Interruptions)... ִ֤ ...(־֮֬) ִ֤ , ֯ כ ֟ ...(־֮֬) ֯ כ, ֯ ֟

SHRI AMAR SINGH: This is the word which has been used in some reference. ...(Interruptions)... Please don't make it an issue.

SHRI ARUN JAITLEY: Mr. Venkaiah Naidu only quoted Mr. Yechury..

...(Interruptions)...

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: Sir, I am only quoting him. I have told, I have no objection. If Jaitley Saheb had given a little more of his very valuable time to listen to the speeches in Parliament, then, perhaps, he would have understood the context in which I have said it. But it does not matter; I have no objection to that. The point that I want to make, Sir, is that we don't mind......(Interruptions)...

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Please conclude.

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: If somebody is interrupting; I have no objection; they can go on. I have only said, whether it is * or biting, they know; I am not interested in that. But the point that I want to make is that we want to know it from the Government of India. You

---------------------------------------------------

*Expunged as ordered by the Chair.


have come to power on a programme which has assured the people of the country that you are going to reverse those anti-people, anti-poor policies which were followed by the NDA Government. One of those, Sir, is the whole issue of food security. (Contd. by TMV/2A)

-MKS-TMV-MCM/2A/2.30

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT (CONTD.): The point is that we want to know straight from this Government: Are you or are you not going to rescind the pro-trader changes which were made in the Essential Commodities Act? Are you or are you not going to rescind the pro-hoarder changes which were made subsequently in that Act? As far as future trading is concerned, are you not going to ban--this was a policy of your own previous Governments--future trading in essential commodities? Having said this, I hope that this Government will learn lessons from the past and will prevent itself from taking the disastrous path which its predecessor took and which the people so aptly responded to in the 2004 general elections. Thank you. (Ends)

ֳ֯ן : ָ ֤ , ֮־ָ ֻ ߛ ֯ ֮ ֯ ֙ ӓ ״֮֙ և

ָ ֤ : ӓ ״֮֙

SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, just one minute because my name has been taken. I have not used the word * or "biting". I borrowed those words and quoted from her friend, the CPM leader, Shri Sitaram Yechury. I do agree that the words * and "biting" should not be used in parliamentary parlance. I felt painful. It was used in a television debate and that was continuously carried. (Interruptions)...

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: A television debate and a parliamentary debate are different. (Interruptions)...

SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Sir, public is also equally important. If they feel that these words should not be used and the CPM is ready to withdraw them, I have no objection to withdraw myself. (Interruptions)...

SHRI JANARDHANA POOJARY: Sir, it can't be done. He can't put any condition. (Interruptions)...

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Please.

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: Sir, I just want to make a point. This is a typical BJP style. We are talking about rising prices. We are talking about burdens of the people. (Interruptions)...

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Okay.

SHRIMATI BRINDA KARAT: I am not bothered about * and bites. The point is that the people are bitten by these high prices. That is what we are concerned about. I am not bothered about ... (Interruptions)...

SHRI JANARDHANA POOJARY: Sir, what is your ruling? Still he is standing by it. (Interruptions)...

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: I have removed the word *.

ָ ֤ (ײָ) : ֳ֯ן , Ӥ ָ ֟ פ , ։ և , ו, Ӥ ָ ֌׸ ִֻ , ִ ֳ֯ן , ׾֢ ӡ , ׮־ ָ ֪֮ , ָָ , ו֮֟ ָ ָָ և , ֪֮ ֲ֕ ֙ ִ ֣ פ ֻ֟ ֙ և ־֮Դ 000 ָָ , ִֻ ָָ ֕ ׾֢ ӡ , ָ߲ ߓ ֕ , ֯ և ָָ 같 ״֡ ֣ , ֤֕ ֤

---------------------------------------------------

*Expunged as ordered by the Chair.


27 ָ ֋ פ ָ߲ 㿟 ֛ ִ ָ߲ ߓ ָ߲ , ß ִ ָ ֕ , 27 ָ ֋ ֮֯ ֵ ֵ, ו ֯ ו , ִ ֮ߠ ֛ ײ֛ ָָ ֮ , ׾ӛ , ֤ ׮ֵ ָ ו ָ ׾ָ֓ ־ , ָ ָ ־ ֵ ׮ֵ ߕ ֺ ָ ֺ , ֟ ָ ֤ ֋, ָ ֺ ֮ כו֮ ָߵ ִ֫߯ ֤ Ӿֻ , ָ ־֮ Ӿֻ , ִ օ ִ ן ֆ ֕ ׾֟ , Ӿֻ (2b ָ ֿ:)

GS-VK/2B/2.35

ָ ֤ (֟) : ֓ ֮ ֤ , ןֵ ָ ֣ ֤ ָ ֋Ӆ ֯ և ־ֻ ָ ӳ߸ ׾֮֟ ׻֋ ֛ ׮ֳֵָ ִ ֜ , ָ Ӥ ָ ָ ֟ ָ߲ ׻֋ ֵ ִ ֻ ֯ ϯֻ ן , ִ ָ ן , ִ ֺ ߮ ָ , ו֮ և ӲӬ , ֵ ֤ ֙ ֮ߠ ָ ֻ-, ֙-֙ և , ֛ ֵ ֲ ִ ֤ ֟ , ִ֟ פ֛ ֤֕ ֳ 30 ֤ ß֮ 30 ֤ ֤֕ 35 ֤ ֮ , ܵ ܵ Ӿ-ָ , פ , 㴲և פ֛ , פֳָ ֤֕ ֮֟ ִ ֤ ֲֻ֟, ֵֿ ֯ օ ֛ߋ ִ֮ , ߮ ֣ ָ ִ֮ כ ֓ , ִֵ ֵ ֮ ֤ ֮ וֲ ִ ״ֻ כ ֓ ן ߅ ֕ ֛ ֤ ߟָ ָָ , ֛ߋ ָָ , ֤ ֻ֟ Ӥ օ և ֜ , כ ֓ , ׾֢ ӡ ִ 650 ֲ ָߤ ֵ, ָ֕ ָ ֵ ֵ ִ ֯ ӟָ ״ֻ, ִ ֟ , ָ ו֮ ׌֟ ֮֟ և ֮ פ

׌׸ ֲ ֛ ףֵָ ߆և , ֲ ֛ ףֵָ ߆և օ ߆և ָߤ ָ֯ ָߤ , ӛ , ևԾ , ׿ֵ֮ ߙ , ָֻ, ևԙ ֮֯ ן , ӛ ֟ , Ӿ ֟ ָ ָ֯ Ӿ ֮ ֕֟ , Ӿ ֮ ֕֟ ״ֻ և ׾֢ ӡ , ֯ ֟։ ֮ ֛ ִ פ , ֯ ֺ ֮ ָ ֮ ֮ ֤ ִ פ - 165 , 2 ֵ ֤ פ , 700 ֵ , ָ 5 ֵ, 3 ֵ פ , ֤ ִ פ ָ ָߤ ָָ .., ֙ ״֡, ן ֮ ֮և , ֯ ָ ֮ , ֮֯ ִ ֤֮ ֯ ֛-֛ ׮ֵ ֻ֮֯ ֯ ֕ ָ֕ , ֯ ֟։ ֮ ָ-֙ ֵ, ו Ӥ֕ ֵ ֤ ֟ , ֮ ֤ ֟ ֯ ߆և ףֵָ , , ֟ , ֯ ֛ߋ ָָ ִ֮ 62 ״׻ֵ֮ , 620 ֕ 2002 ָ օ ֲ ֮ 400 ֕ , ׮ֵ ֯ , ִָ ָ ־ֻ ִָ 6 ߙ Ӥ ָ ָ ֳ֟ , ظ Ù ֵ, ֛֛ ߅ ֯ ָ և ֮֯ Ù ו֋, ֯ ֟ ֯ ָ ֋ Ù ֳ֯ן , ֛ߋ ָָ ִֵ14 ֛ ֮ 200 ֕ פ ִ 100 ײ֮ ׻֋ ָ߲ ָ ֈ , ָ ֕ ִ օ (2 ָ ָ)

SC/2.40/2C

ָ ֤ (֟) : ֯ ׾ָ֓ , ׻ ֤ ֵ , ׻֋, , ֮ ָ ،֙ ֕ ָ߲ ֤ ֵօ ִֵ ֯ ֕ã֮ ֙ ָָ ߅ , Ӿ , ӓ ֙ ָ ָ ֟ ֮߅ ׮׿֟ ָ כ ֓ ָ ָ ֋ ֋? ֮ ֻןֵ ׻֋ ֋ ֋? ׿ֵֻ כ ״֓ , ִ ֌ , ִ ֻ ֵ ֮ ֤ ָ ֵ ֣ ָָ ָ֮ , ֻ ָߤ , ֯ ֟։ - ֋߅ ָ֕ ׻֋ ֮ ߤ ֵ , ֯ ֨ ֣Ԯ , דָ֤ , ֯ ֻ ֤ ֯ ׾֮֟ ֮ ִֻ ֮ ן , ָ ֻ֟ ֯ և פ և ָ ߮ ֤ ֕ ִ߮ ֵ ֤ , ֯ , ָ ָ߲ ߓ ֻ ֕ ֟ ֟ ֟ ָ ֲ ֟ ֕ ֋, ָ ֋ ֤ ֟ כ ֓ ֻ ֤ , ֋ ֟ ֲ ֕ ֟ , ָ֯ , ו֮ ָ֯ , פ ֮ ו֋ ֋ ֮ ֛ , ָ֕ ֟ ׯ֯׸ ֻ ꮮև ײ ֋ ׯ֯׸, ֬ Ϥ ֵ օ ׯ֯׸ ֻ ֲ ֛ ӛ ִ ӓ ָ ،֙ ֻ ꮮև ָ֕ ײ ָ֕ ִ ִ ײ ִ ֵ֤ ָ֕ , כ ֓ , ָ ؛ - ִֻ ֯ ֻ֟ Ù ׸ ׿ֵֻ כߕ ו֮֟ , ֯ ִָ ׸ כ ֓ ֮ ֵ , ֯ ֱ ֟ ֯ ׮־ ִ ֻ֟ ֻ և ֕ ָ֯ օ ָ ָָ - ָ֕ ֟ ײ ֟ כ ֓ ߆և, ׻ ꌵ ߆և ׸ օ ߆և ֛ߋ ֵ֮, ߕ ֵ֮օ ߆և ֮ ߆և ָ ֕ ָߤ ֟ օ ִ֮ Ϭ֮ ӡ ײָ ֕֯ ״ֻօ ֌ ָߤ, ָ֕ ָߤ, ִֵ ֱ ׸ ӕֲ ֮ ָߤ ֟ ߅ ֜ , ײָ - ֮֯ ָ ײָ ָߤ ֵ , ִ - , ִ , ֲ և ꌵ ֮ օ ָ ָָ օ ֮ ִֻ , ֲ 14 ֈ ֛ ֵ, ֲ և ֟ ֻ, ָ פ ֵ߅ ָ ָ ָָ , ָ ָָ ִ ֛ ֤֮ ߆և , ִ ֲ ꌵ ֳ 9 ֤֕ ֟ ֵ֤ ָָ ִ ֻ ֛ ֤֕ , ֯ ָ ܾ֮ ֯ ִ , ִ ߤ פ ֋ ֲ ֯ ߆և ֱ ֣ ֵ, ִ߮

ߴ֟ Ӥ ָ : ևև

ָ ֤ : ևև ֯ ֯ ֲ ߕ և և ֯ ֣ ֲָ , օ ׮ֵ ָ ־֟ ֯ ״֮֙ ֮ ֋ ֯ ֛ ׮ֵ ָ ֺ ־֟ , ׸ ׮ֵ ָ ֲ ָ , ֻ֮ ֻ (2 ָ ֿ:)

MP/2D/2.45

ָ ֤ (֟) : ֱֻ ־֟ ־֟ ֲ , ֲ ֯ ֻ֟ ֤ ֋ꅠ ֯ ִ , ִ , ֪֮ , ו ֲ ָָ , ֲ ָָ ֲ֕ , ꌵ ..և. , ִ ߕ ..և. ֛֛ ֮֮ ֛֛ ֕ ָ֮ , ִ ֛֛ ֯ , ֯ ֯ ֮ פ, ֛֛ ߅ ֯ ֮֯ פ, ֛֛ ߅ ..և. ֛֛ , ؓן֟ ֯ ָ ״׮Ù , פ ָ ָ֕ , ֮ ״ֻ - ָ꯿֮ ֻ֟ ָ꯿֮ ֯ ׮ֻ ו֋, ָ ֻֻ֮߮ ֮֯ פ , ֯ ׮ֻ ו֋ ָߤ ֮ ֤ ״ֻ ֵ , ֮ ֟ ֯ օ ۠ ֟ ֮ ו֋, ָָ , ֳ ֙ , ׾֢ ӡֵֻ ֛ ߕ , ׾ֻ ׾֋֮ ״׮Ù , ֛ ߕ , և.. ״׮Ù , ֛ ߕ ָ ׻֋ ָ ״׮Ù, ӛ ׾ֻ ֯և ״׮Ù ָ ״׮Ù - ִ ֮֟ ֲ ֛ ֮օ ߮ , ֯ ָָ ֋ פ , -֟ ֻ ׾֢ ӡ , ֯ ָָ ! ֟ ֻ ֯օ ָ߲ ֤ ֲ ֛ , ׻֋ ףֵָ ֓ ֮ ֟ ß֮ ֜-׻ ߮ ֮֟ ֵ, , ֲ ׮ֵ֟ ֻֻ֕ ֙ ״֡ ׾֢ ӡ , ֯ ׮־ ֯ ֮ ß ָ ֻ פ, ֯ ֮ ֮־֙ ֯ ֟ ָ ֮, ֟ ֌ ֮ ו֋ ֣ ӓ ׻ֵ , , ֮ ו֋ ֮ ָ ֯ ӟִ֕ ִ ףֵָ ֯ ֕ , Ӥ ָ ٙ ׾ָָ֓ , և ָ פ ֟ ׮׿֟ ָ ֯ ֟ ו֋ ֪֮ , ֻ֟ և , ..և., ֮֯ ֌׸ ֲ ֛ ףֵָ , ׮ , և ָߤ և כ ֓ , , ֮֟ ִ , ֯ ֣ , ֻ֟ և ֜ , ߮ ߕ , և ֮֜ ֲ ֛ ָ , ָָ ָ פ ֯ ָ ֟ ֓ ֟ , ֟ , ָ , ו̤ ׻֋ , ֮֟ כ ֓ ָ״ֿ֮ ߅ ֳ֯ן , ֔֟ Ӆ פ օ , פ ִ ׻ֵօ , ߲ ߕ ִ ֋ ֯ פ ? ֯ ãן ? ֯ ֲ ߕ ִ օ ִ פ Ӿ ֤ , ֟ ֤ , ֮ ֤ , ֮ ֛ ֳ օ ֟ ֵ, ֕ ֮֟ ֻ֟ ԅ ֻ֟ ֯ ׸ ֯ ׿ֵֻ כ ֮ ֵ֮ , ֯ ָָ ׻֋ ׿ֵֻ כ ߱ ״׮Ù , ֯ և ߮ פ, ߮ ߮ ָ ߮ և ֜ ֤, : ߮ ֤ ֯ ֟ ׿ֵֻ כ ֮ 2002 ֈ פ, ׻֋ ֋ , ׮ ֤ , ׮ֻ ו֋ և ֯ ֣ ٻִֵ , ֻ֟ ֯ ׿ֵֻ כ ׸߻ ו֋, և ꅠ ֛ ? ֮֟ ֛ ? ױ ֮֯ ֤ ִ ֤ ! ִ ֤ פ ֜ ֻ- , ֙- פ ֻ כ, ߅ ִ ֣ ֮ ׿ ֵ օ ׻֋ ֳ֯ן , ֯ ִ֬ ߮ ָ ׾֢ ӡ , ִ֠ ... , ײ כÙ֮ Ù , ָ ָָ ִֵ, ӡ ֮֮ ֤ ָ ؙ և ߅ (2 E/ASC ָ ֿ:)

ASC-TDB/2.50/2E

ָ ֤ (֟) : և ״׮Ù ָ וֿ֮ ֵ ֵ ֵ ܵ ӡ և ֻ ״׮Ù ֮ ִ ֻ, ֯ ܵ סֵ և ֈ , ֯ , ִ ײ כÙ߲֮ Ù , ָ ָ - ֯ ܵ סֵ և ߛߋ וִָ ו֋ ױ ֋, ֯ և ִ ֟ ֟ ׻֋ ֻ֟ ߛߋ ִ֬ , ֕ ָ߲ ֤ ֟ , ֛ ףֵָ ֯ ? ֯ ֮֟ ֯ þֵ ֮ ֛ ײ֛ ֲ ֯ ־ֲ ֟֋ ֯ ܵ סֵ ؙ ֯ ֻ ֙ ؙ և ׸ ߛߋ , ߆և , ֯ כߕ ֓ ׸ ־ֻ ױ ׸և ׸ ֯ ױ ֮ ן ָ և, ֮ ß ָ և ֯ ו֮-ו֮ ß ֮ , և ֯ ִ ֋ ֯ ß ָ ֲ ֣, ֮ ֟ ִ֯ ֮֯ ֮ ִֵ ֤ פ, ׻֋ ֯ ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

֮־ָ ֻ ֻ (ָ Ϥ) : ֳ֯ן , ֲ ָ ֤ ֬և և Ͽ ָ Ù ָ֟ ׾ָ֓ ָ -߮ և ׾ָ֓ , և ָ ֻ ָ , ֲ ִֵ և ֲ ֛ ִ֕־֤ ֙ ֵ ֟ ֤ ֟, ֻ և ָ ֮ ֟ օ ָ ״֡ 鮤 ָ ־ֿ ß ׬׮ִֵ ֮ և ֜ , ֟ ָָ ײֻ ֟ ֟ ֟ 1993 ֲ ֓ ܵ ӡ ִֵ ֤ ־ֿ ß ׬׮ִֵ ָ Ϥ ִ֯ օ ֛ ־ ֟ ֤ ָ Ϥ և ֜߅ ָָ ֻ֟ ־ֿ ß ׬׮ִֵ ֟ և ֜ ֲ և ֟ ױ ֻ ָ ֟ , ָ ߕ ָ ֟ , ־ֿ ß ׬׮ִֵ -Ӥ ָ -Ӥ ִ ֮ ֤֕ ֤ ֓ ֻ ֜ , ו֮֟ ֻ ֻ ֜ ִ ߟֻ ָ ֵֻ ߕ , ֮ ֋ ִ ֕ ֜ ָ ֋ ײ 135 ֋ ߟֻ ֕ ӓ ֋ ײ ? ׮ִֵ ָ ־ֿ ß ׬׮ִֵ , ֕ ָ և ֜ և ? ֕ Ù߻ ִ ָ և ֜ և ? ֕ ֻ ֕ ִ ָ և ֜ և , ֲ ָ ־ֿ ß ׬׮ִֵ ֙ ״֡ ֮ ״ֵ ה֮ ׻֋ և ß ֮֟ ֮ ֟ ׻֋ ֯׸ ֮֮ ׻֋ ֻ֟ ֟ , ֤ ֻ֟ ֟ ֮ Ӆ , ֮ ףֵ ׮־ ֲ ֯׸ ֟ և, ֯׸ ֯ ֵ ֛ ָ֯ ֛ ָ֯ ? ֕ ևԙ ָ֯ ָֻ ָ֯ פ ִ ֮֜ ִ ևԙ ָֻ ׮ֵ ֕ ӛ ֜͟ , ָ֕ ֻ ָ֯ , ֮ և ֮֜ ִ ָ ֤ ֻ ָ֯, ָ֯, ӛ ֜ ֵ , ֵ ֱ ӓ ֋ ֤ ֱ ֟ ׻֋ ָֻ ָ ߴ , ִ ֟ ֵ , ִ Ӥ ָֻ ֮ Ӥ ו֋, ևԙ ֮ Ӥ ו֋ ָ֯ ֟ ָֻ ו֋ (2F/NB ֿ:)

NB/2F/2.55

֮־ָ ֻ ֻ (֟) : ֮־ָ, ָ ß֮ ָ֯, ֻ ָ֯ Ӿ ֣ ָ ָָ֟ ָ֕ , ָ ֟ כ ָ֯ , և ֮֜ ִ , ִ ִ ֯׸ ֮ ӕ ֤ ֤ ָߤ , ָ ָߤ , ӓ ָ ָߤ , ָ ָߤ , ֲ ָֻ ֮ ָߤ , - ָߤ ָ Ϥ ָߤ , ֈ ֟ , ֈ ָߤ , ӕֲ ֟ , ӕֲ ָߤ , ߸ ֟ ׻֋ ־ ֛ ׮ֵ ָߤ ָ ֲӤ ֺ ֮ ֕ և ֜ , ֻ ߕ ֜ , ߕ ֜ և ֙ ֮ ׾ָ ן ָ֯ ׾ָ ן ָ ֜

ֳ֯ן , ֻ ֮ ֟ ָ ՙ ָߤ , ֕ ֮ և ֟ , ֲ ָ ՙ ָߤ ֟ ־ֿ ß ׬׮ִֵ ֤ ָ ־ֿ ß ׬׮ִֵ ָ, ֕֯ ָָ ֤ ָ 3/7 ֵ օ ֤ ִ 2002 215 ֋ ן , ֕ 265 ֋ ן ֵ ? ֤ ִ ֮ ֵ֜, ߕ ִ ֮ ֵ֜? ֙ ֮ ׾ָ ן ֵ֜ ֕ ֮ ֟ ָ ֺ ֮ ֟ , ָ™ ֟ ߅ ָ Ϭִ֮ӡ ֋ , ׾֤ ׻֋ 1,500 ֋ פօ ָ Ϥ ֮ ׻֋ ֟ , ָ ֣ ־ ֵ ֮ פ ֵօ ָ Ϥ פ ֵ, ׾֤ פ ֵ ֲ Ϭִ֮ӡ ׾֤ ֮ ֋, ֤ ָ Ϥ 62 ֮ ֟֋ , ֛ ִ ֟ ?

ֳ֯ן , ֕ ֵ֟ 900 ֋ ן ،֙ ־ ָ ֵ֟ ָ ָ Ϥ ִܵӡ ֜ ֚ ֋ ׻֋ ָ , ָָ ָߤ , ָߤ ֵ, 900-950 ֋ ן ،֙ ֲ ֯ , ֲָ ֟ ? ׻֋ ֕ ֮ : ֕ ִ֬ ָ֯ ִ֬ ׸, ִ֬ , ָ ן Ͽ ָ ן ׸֟Ԯ ֋ .... (־֮֬)

֕߾ ㌻ : ֳ֯ן ,

ֳ֯ן : ߻

֮־ָ ֻ ֻ : ֕߾ , ֵ ֤õ , ֮ ו֋, ֯ ֮ ֤õ ... (־֮֬) և, ֮ ו֋ .... (־֮֬)

֕߾ ㌻ : ֮֯ ֟ , ֻֻ ֮ ֮ , ֲ ָ ֲ ָߤָ ָ Ϥ , ֱ 50,000 ֤֮ ָ Ϥ פ ֕ ... (־֮֬) ָ Ϥ ָָ ָ֮֯ ֕ ׻֋ וִָ ?

ק : ֯ ֮ ֙ ..... (־֮֬) ֯ ָ Ϥ ֮ ... (־֮֬)

شری شاہد صدیقی : آپ کسان کا پیٹ کاٹنا چاہتے ہو ۔۔۔۔۔۔مداخلت۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ آپ اترپردیش کے کسانوں کی اپیکشا کر رہے ہیں ۔۔۔۔۔۔مداخلت۔۔۔۔۔۔۔

ֳ֯ן : ק , ֯ ך ... (־֮֬)

֮־ָ ֻ ֻ : ֕߾ ֟ .... (־֮֬)

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ך ߕ̅

֮־ָ ֻ ֻ : ֮־ָ, ׮־ ָ Ϥ ִܵӡ ָָ ִ֣Ԯ 滵 ֜ ֋ ֜ ֜ ֚ ֵ פ ֋, ֜ ֋ ִ֣Ԯ 滵 , ָָ ֮ ִ֣Ԯ 滵 ֮֜ ִ օ ֯ ֚ ֵ ß֮ ֮ , ֋ Ù׻ֵ ָߤ , ֛ ֲָ ֟ ? և ֜ , ׻֋ ֜

ֳ֯ן , և ֜ ָ , ָ ߮ ָ ֟֋ , ָ ֟ ָ - ֮ ׾ָ ָ֯ ׾ָ ןօ ָ ָָ ֮ ֮ ׾ָ ן ֛߅ ֮ ֻ 滵 ֤ ֤ ֛օ ָ ֯ ֮ ֻ ֤ ֤ 滵 , ֮ ֲָ ֋օ

2G/AKG ָ ֿ:

PREVIOUS