PREVIOUS PAGE

NEXT PAGE

AKG-GSP/2A/1.00

ֵָ (֟) : ָ ָ ܵ ӡ ־߮ ֵ֙ ןׯϵ ׌ ִ ָ ֮֟ ןׯϵ ־֕ פ ָ , ֮ ֻ ֤õ ֟ ֵ ֮֟ ו ִֵ ܵ ӡ, , ִֵ ֤ ֤õ, ߕ ֵ֙ statue ֵ, ןִ פ ֵ, ִֵ ָ ־߮ ֵ֙ ָ Ի ֮, ֕ ׻ֵ Ի ֮ , ߕ ֵ֙ ־߮ ֵ֙ ׯ֟ ꅠ ߕ ֵ֙ ןִ ֵօ ׯ֔ ֻ ָ֟ ֵ, , ׾ֵ ָ ֟ , ָ ֣ ׯ֔ ֻ ӯ ָָ ָ֟ -־

ֳ֯ן : ֯ և

ֵָ : ֻ֮ Ùߙ և ֮֮ ֻ , ֮֮ פ ֵօ , ֻ þ׳ִ֮ , 1500 ֋ ֻ֮ ֳ , ևև ׻֋ וֿ ֲ ׯ֔ , ׯ֔ ã֮ , ו ֟ - ֻӛ, ߸ ֯ ֯ ֲ ֮֟ ֻӛ ִָ, ָ߲ ׸ ֵԵ־֓ ֯, ֻӛ ߸ - ֮ ָָ Ӥ ֯ Ϭ֮ ӡ ֮ ׻֋ פ ֋ ݵ Ϭ֮ ӡ ֻ ֋, ָָ Ϭ֮ ӡ ֿ ֮ , ֲ ֟  ֮, ֕ פ 㴲և ֯ ֛ ֮ ... (־֮֬) ...

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Sir, the Central Government has sanctioned an amount of...(Interruptions) Without knowing the facts, he is speaking. (Interruptions)

ӟ ֛פ : ָ, ֯ allow , ֛ ֋ ..(־֮֬)...

ֵָ : ֛ ֋ ... (־֮֬) ...

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ֟ ו֋

ֵָ : , ִָ ָ߲ ׸ , ָָ ֮ ... (־֮֬) ...

ֳ֯ן : allow ... (־֮֬) ... ֯ և ... (־֮֬) ... ֛ ָ ֋ ... (־֮֬) ...

ֵָ : *

ӟ ֛פ : ֯ Ϭ֮ ӡ ָ ֟ ִ֮ ... (־֮֬) ...

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ֛ ? ... (־֮֬) ...

ֵָ : *

ֳ֯ן : ֯ , ֛ ָ ... (־֮֬) ... , և ... (־֮֬) ...

ֵָ : *

ֳ֯ן : ֮֮ߵ ֤õ, ֯ և ... (־֮֬) ... ֲ ֛ ָ ֋ ... (־֮֬) ... , և ... (־֮֬) ... ״ֵ֙ ֋ ... (־֮֬) ... , և

(ִ֯)

ִ֤ Ͼֻ (֕ã֮) : ָ, ֮ ֯ ֋

֚ () : ָ, ֮ ֯ ֋

߸ () : ָ, ֮ ֯ ֋

----------------------------------

* Not recorded.

 

ֳ֯ן : ӟ ֛פօ ֯ ׯ׾ֻ ֮ ָ ֮ , ָ ׻֋

ӟ ֛פ : ָ, ׻֋, ׻֋ ֮ ! ָ, ׻֋ sanctioned

ֳ֯ן : ... (־֮֬) ...

ӟ ֛פ : ָ, permitted

ֳ֯ן : ꅠ ... (־֮֬) ...

ӟ ֛פ : ֕ ֮֯ ... (־֮֬) ...

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ֋ ꅠ ֯ ֻ ֯ ֻ ִֻ

SHRI JANARDHANA POOJARY: Sorry, Sir. I beg your pardon. (Interruptions)

ֳ֯ן : ֵ֟ ָ ײ̮֕ , ߮ ײֻ ... (־֮֬) ... ֯ ... (־֮֬) ...

SHRI JANARDHANA POOJARY: Sir, it is an important issue. (Interruptions) Sir, I have been keeping quiet. (Interruptions) I have been keeping quiet.

ֳ֯ן : , ֋ ... (־֮֬) ...

SHRI JANARDHANA POOJARY: Sir, it is in the Concurrent List. The Parliament can take cognizance of it. (Interruptions)

ֳ֯ן : ײֻ ו֋ I have gone through your papers. Wait for tomorrow. (Interruptions)

ӟ ֛פ : ָ, ֯ ׾ֵ ָ ֮ ׻֋ allow ?

ֳ֯ן : ֮֯ ׯ׾ֻ ָ , allow Zero Hour is over.

ӟ ֛פ : ָ, ߸ ָ  ֲ

MR. CHAIRMAN: Don't waste time.

ӟ ֛פ : ֯ ֮օ ָ ֮ ו֋ (Contd. by 2B/sk)


ֳֳ

SK-HMS/2b/1.05

RE. STATUS OF PRIVILEGE NOTICE

AGAINST THE LEADER OF OPPOSITION

SHRI SANTOSH BAGRODIA (RAJASTHAN): Sir, this particular Privilege Notice, which I have already given to you, is in terms of Direction 35. when a Member seeks permission of the Chairman to lay a paper or a document on the Table of the House under Direction No. 2, he is required to certify in either of the three modes set out in the direction, namely, certify that the document is authentic from his personal knowledge, the document being an original document, or certify that the document is a true copy of the original, which is authentic or and, this being the third mode, that the contents of the document are correct and based on authentic information. Sir, the Leader of the Opposition, while speaking, had mentioned in his speech, that he has laid a paper here. ...(Interruptions)..

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ֟և, ִֻ ?

ӟ ֛פ : ָ, Ӆ ֯ ֈ

ֳ֯ן : ֮ ׻֋ ֈ օ ֯ ״֮֙ ֮

ӟ ֛פ : ָ, ״֮֙ It is a serious matter, Sir. The House is being misguided by the Leader of the Opposition.

MR. CHAIRMAN: But, he is not here.

SHRI SANTOSH BAGRODIA: The sender is one Senator, Mr. Thomas Graham, and the recipient is Mr. Harry Barnes. I have personally dealt with Mr. Harry Barnes. Harry Barnes ֵ, "First of all, I should know that I know of no Senator, Thomas W. Graham. I do know of Thomas Graham, who, in the 1990s worked at the Rockefeller Foundation in New York. There was no Senator, I have also enquired, never in the history of the USA. Thomas W. Graham ִ ֮ ָ ֟, , "Secondly, I have no recollection of the specific communication you mentioned coming to me in 1995 or at all for that matter. ָ , 95 ֵօ ֈ misguide , ׻֋ י ׻ֵ ֵօ ׯ׾ֻ פ ֋

ֳ֯ן : ֯ ׻ֵ, օ ִֵָ, ֯ ?

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Let Mr. Datta Meghe speak, Sir. I will speak after him. He wants to speak on Vidarbha.

 

SHORT DURATION DISCUSSION ON SUICIDE BY FARMERS IN VARIOUS PARTS OF COUNTRY AND DEMAND TO INCREASE MINIMUM SUPPORT PRICE OF FOODGRAINS...(CONTD.)

 

(ָ™) : ֳ֯ן , ׾׳֮ ֮ ָ ֟- ֣ ֤֮ ִ֟ ִ֣Ԯ 滵 ר ָ ֻ ֳ֯ן , ָ Ϭ֮

ֳ֯ן : ֮֮ߵ ֛פ , ֯ ֮֋ , ֯ , ֲ ו֋

: , ָ ֮ܵ 65 ןֿ֟ Ӳ׬֟ ־ֵ ָ ָ ֤ և ָ , ߸-߸ ֕ ֮ - ֻ֟ ӳ߸ ֕ ֮ ָ߲, ߴָ ֟

ֳ֯ן , ָ ו֮ ָ ֈ ֵ , ׯ֔ 30 ֻ ׻י ָ ־ָ ֮ ָ ָ ӳ߸֯ ֟ 35 ֻ ֤֕ ֮֟ ָ ֮


ֳ֬ (0 00 ׸֮) ߚ߮

, ָ Ϭ֮ ӡ ӡ ָ ׾֤ ׸ ֋ ֮ ו֮ ָ ֟- , ֳ ֟ ֵָ ֟ ߅ ߓ ֻ֟ ֤ օ ׻֋ ָ Ϭ֮ ӡ Ϭ֮ ӡ , ֮ ֣ - ֟ , Ӿ ֋ ֳ ֟ ߅ (2//ߋ־ ָ ֿ:)

PSV-YSR/2C/1.10

(֟) : ֳ֬ , ָ Ϭ֮ ӡ ֮ 3750 ֋ ִ ֮ ֱ 712 פ ֵ ֋ ֣ ָ֮ 1296 ֋ פ ֓և ׾ ׻֋ ϻײ֟ ׮ִ 2177 פ ֓և ׻֋ 318 פ ϴ֟ ߕ ׻֋ 180 ֋ ™ߵ ֤֮ ״ֿ֮ ׻֋ 225 ֋ ֮ ֵԵ 135 פ ֯֟ ֻ ׻֋ וֻ׬ָ 50 ֋ ֟ ָ

׾֤ ֟ ԅ ֱ ׾֤ ָ™ , ׻ ֮, ԙ פ ָ ֳ֯ן , , ֵ֤ , ״ִ֮ , ֯ ׻֋ ׸ օ ֳ֬ , ׾֤ ֕ ׯ֔ Ϥ , ֯ ֮֕֬ օ ֲ ӵ㌟ ָ™ ֮, ִ ״ֻ օ ִֵ ׾ֿ פ ֵ օ 371(2) ִֻ ָ ָ ׾֤ פ ֋օ ָ ԟ ׾֤ ׾ þֵ֢ ׾ ӛ ֮ ׾ ӛ ֻ֕֯ ָ ֤ ָ ֮ , ֋ ֮ Ϭ֮ ӡ ֲ ׾֤ ֋, þִ֣֮߮ , ֮ , ֵօ ֤ ӟ Ϭ֮ ֈ ״ , ׮ֵ֮ ״ן , ָ ևՅ ֵ֮ ֤, ׸ ָָ , ׯִ֮ օ

ֳ֬ , ֮ ֟--- 11 וֻ 6 וֻ ָ וֻ ־ֻ ָ 11 וֻ : וֻ פ ֵ ֲָָ ֻ֟ ֜דָ וֻ, פ וֻ , וֻ ֮ ֟ ָ Ϭ֮ ӡ ӡ ֮ ֤ 105 ֮ ֟ ֮ ָ™ ָָ ֋ ֮ ֳ ϟ ״ֻ֮ , ִ - פ ָ ӡ ֻ ָ פ ? ָ , ֛ ֮ ָ ֵ , - ֓և ֮ֆ ֮ ׻֋ ָ ӡ ֟ ֻ

֕ ׾֤ ֮ ֟ , ? ֤ ָ ֓ ֟ , ߴ֟ ״ֻ֟ ָ ֤ ֻ ֮ , ׻֋ ׬ָ ֮ , ߅ ֤ ״ֻ֟ , ֋ꅠ Ù Եָ ߴ , ִ ֵ, ֮ ֵ֤ օ ָ ָ ׬ָ ֱֻ ֟ , Ù Եָ ֵ֤ օ ֮, ו֮ ״ֻ֟, ֲ ֮ ֵ֤ ֻ ָָ ֮֋ ָ, ָ ֮ ֟ , ִ SC 16 ָ , ST 11 ָ , VJNT? 17 ָ OBC 6.40 ָ ֟ ֲ , ֮ ֟ , ״ֻ֟օ ֵօ ָ ׾֤ , ֲ Ӥ ֋ ֻ ִ , ׸־ ָ ׻֋ ָ ֮ , ևԾ ֮ , ו֮ ֕ 25 40-50 ֟ ֲ ֮ , ֲ֕ , ָ - ֻ , ֤ ֮ ֮ և , ֻ , ״ֻ֟

(2/000 ָ ֿ:)

2D/klg-vkk/1.15

(֟) : ױ ֤ ֓ ֮ ׸ָ ִֻ , ׻֋ ߱ ֟ Ӥ ֮ ָ ֟ ߋ ָָ ׻֋ ִ , ֋ ãן օ ֟ ֟ , , ׻֋ ϵ օ ϵ ׻֋ ӣ Ϭ֮ ָ ֛ þ֟

, ֟ , ֮ ָ , ֻ֟ , ֲָ ָ ָ , ߓ Ӥ֮ ֤ ֻ ֟ ָ ֯ ׾֤ , ֮ ֯ Ӥ֮ ֻև, ֯ ֣ , ߓ ֟ ו֋ ..(־֮֬).. ֯ , ׻֋ ֮ ߱ ֕ ָ ׾֤ Ӥ ֮ ׻֋ ָָ ֕ ָָ ָ ָ ӡ, 35 ֻ ֮֟ , ֣ ִ ׾֤ ߻, ֻ, ָ֮ , ׻֋ ֵ , ֻ ֻ ָ ֮ և ״ֻ, ֟ , ָ, Ӭ ״ֻ ֟־ָ , ֿ ׻֋ 겻ִ , ָ ״ֻ֟ , ׻֋ ֯ ֿ ׻֋ ָ ֯ ֮֋ , ָ ָ וֻ , -߮ וֻ , ׻֋ , ֮ ֟

, ָ ӣ Ϭ֮ ָ פ þ֟ ו֮-ו֮ ֮ֆ ֮ ׻֋ - , ֮ ֻ - ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY (PONDICHERRY): Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, thank you for giving me this opportunity to speak on the very important subject of farmer suicides. It is a major concern for the Government of India and also the State Governments. The kind of efforts made by the UPA Government to see that there is no suicide by the farmers and the kind of scheme they have announced, have now started yielding results.

Sir, the hon. Agriculture Minister himself is a farmer. He knows about the problems of the farming community better. Most of the hon. Members have spoken on this issue, highlighting various issues. I am not going into those issues. Sir, I would like to submit three or four important issues. Sir, the hon. Agriculture Minister will agree with me that there is no strategic investment in the agricultural sector for irrigation and creating infrastructure for the farmers. Sir, hardly 0.5 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product is being utilised for creating infrastructure for the farmers, namely, the irrigation facilities, the transport facilities for the farmers, providing them electricity connection for the pump sets, which is very meagre. In developing countries, it goes more than two or three per cent; in developed countries, it is beyond. Sir, there is lot of criticism. An argument has been coming forward that the subsidies that have been given to the farmers -- whether it is a subsidy in the form of seeds, fertilisers and also the farm subsidy that has been provided -- slowly one by one they have been withdrawn, saying that now, we are going in for modernisation, urbanisation and also globalisation. Sir, all political parties are claiming that they are for the farmers because farmers are the vote bank. But, when it comes to the question of the implementation of various programmes for the farmers, we are not paying due attention. That is the reason for the farmers committing suicides. Sir, if we go through the history, we will find that suicides are taking place in those areas where cash crop is raised by the farmers.

(Contd. by MKS/2e)

-VKK/MKS/AKA/1.20/2E

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY (CONTD): Whether it is in Andhra Pradesh or in Maharashtra or in Karnataka or in the border areas or in parts of Gujarat and Orissa, it is a matter of great concern. The other day, the hon. Finance Minister said in this august House that the Government has earmarked Rs.1,75,000 crores for giving credit to the farmers. This is on record. But, practically, they are not getting this money. I have also asked the hon. Finance Minister whether he has any monitoring mechanism to see that this money is being properly utilised by these bank officers and is being provided to the people who really belong to the farming community. He said, "I cannot go to all the banks to see that. It is practically not feasible for the Finance Minister." Then, I told him that he has a monitoring mechanism at the State level, and also at the district level, to see that the real farming community gets the benefit. I have the personal experience because the people are coming to me, the farmers are coming to me; they are narrating the problems being faced by them in getting the loans. The Minister says, "Without security the loan cannot be given because they are land owners." For the purpose of raising the crop when they go to the banks, hundred questions are being asked by the bank managers and they get frustrated. Then, they go to the moneylenders. They become the victims

of those shackles. This is the major concern.

Another point is regarding the cooperative banking system. The cooperative banking system has become a total failure. It may be working well in Maharashtra or in some parts of the country. But, in other parts of the country, it has become a fiefdom of only a few people. They are cornering everything. In the cooperative banking system, the person who has got the money power and the muscle power, is enjoying everything. It is not going down the line. This is happening in actual practice. The hon. Agriculture Minister knows all this.

Then, Sir, I come to the marketing mechanism. Marketing mechanism is very important. The position of the farming community position is like this. Farmers depend upon their land for their livelihood. They do not have any other source of income. They raise their crop after taking loans from the banks. They educate their children, build houses for their family members and perform various ceremonies/functions. All that is done by them with the money that is accrued to them only from the farm cultivation. And, ultimately, the question of investment in agriculture arises before them. Since they spend the money for performing various social functions, for educating their children, running the family and constructing their houses, they become penniless. Then they opt for taking the loans. When the public sector banks and the cooperative banks do not come forward to help them, then, they go to the moneylenders.

Through the Green Revolution, we have got very good results. Thereafter, there should be a focus on increasing the production. In the adjoining countries like Myanmar, the production of paddy, per hectare, is more than the production of India. In China, it is 29 per cent more than the production of our country. China is able to produce more, but India is producing less. Then, why will not our farmer go into indebtedness? This is the situation.

Now, I come to research and development. What is the amount of investment being made in agriculture? Our farmers are capable of adopting the new technology. They are capable of adopting, but, unfortunately, Sir, after the research work is done, then, it takes a minimum of six or seven or ten or fifteen years for the new technology to reach them, and by that time, it becomes obsolete. Then, that technology is of no use. This is the state of affairs prevailing there.

Now, I come to crop insurance. The Crop Insurance Scheme was started by this Government and the previous Governments. But, it is not being uniformly implemented in all the States. They are doing it in a pick and choose manner. Sir, why can't we make the crop insurance compulsory for the farming community? The Government can contribute; the State Governments can also contribute. We become responsible when we say that the Government has to safeguard the interests of the farmers. Why can't the Government contribute as far as the insurance for the farming community is concerned? I want the hon. Minister to consider this aspect.

Sir, there are various other issues. As far as the farmer's problems are concerned, they are enormous. The hon. Minister has mentioned about the Minimum Support Price. Four Members have raised this issue. (Contd. by TMV/2F)

-MKS/TMV/-AKA/SCH/2F/1.25

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY (CONTD.): The kind of mechanism that they have evolved for the purpose of arriving at the price of the product is itself faulty. That has to be taken care of by the hon. Minister. Ultimately, when it comes to the question of agriculture, we say that the farmers are the backbone of the country. Seventy-five per cent of the people of this country are dependent on agriculture. But we give less importance to agriculture. That is the thing. Surprisingly I find in this august House that most of the industrialists have become farmers. They have started speaking in support of the farmers. I welcome that. I am very happy about that. I want them also to feel how the farmers are suffering and how we can mitigate the sufferings of the farmers.

Then there is the question of cooperative marketing. Cooperative marketing is also a failure. Why? It is because of hoarding, black-marketing and distress sales by the farmers. Distress sale is also one of the major reasons why farmers are suffering. When some crop is produced, the farmers sell it at a lower price. There is distress sale. The businessmen earn a lot of money after some time. These are the various cumulative effects that lead the farmers to commit suicide. In Vidarbha, the farmers committed suicide. In Andhra Pradesh also, the farmers committed suicide. They are our brothers and sisters who have been suffering. Simply if someone tells a man that he is indebted and he has not paid the money to the moneylender, because of family pride he feels aggrieved and goes to the extent of committing suicide. It is a very serious matter.

A package has been announced by the hon. Prime Minister and support has been given by the Agriculture Minister. I welcome that. But, once and for all, the Government has to find a mechanism and come to the help and assistance of farmers right from the day they start cultivation till the day they sell their products.

There is a package by the Government of India and it should be followed by various States. It is not the responsibility of the Central Government alone. The State Government has also a share in it. The State Government has also to cooperate with the Central Government. Therefore, I want the hon. Agriculture Minister to consider all these aspects and give us a very clear reply as to how the Central Government will come to the help of farmers and ensure that the farmers' families flourish in this country. Thank you. (Ends)

׸ ֕־ (ӕֲ): ֮־֤ ָ, ֕ ֈ ָ ֮ ָ ֟֋ , ׾ֵ ָ כ֮

ָ, ӲӬ ֈ ־ֻ ֵ ӕֲ Ӥ ֮ ָ 5000 ׬ ֟֋ ֺ כÙ 200 ֤ ֟֋ , ֛ ֟ ӕֲ ָָ ָ ׸ , ӡ þֵ ָ ֟ ߅ ӕֲ Ϭ֮ ֕ ӕֲ ֮ ֮ ֓ ֤ ֮ ֻ ָ ֕ ӕֲ ֻ֟ ß֮ ֜ և, ֤ ׸ , ָ ִ֮ ׸ כÙ ָ 75% ׸ , וֻ 54% 25% ԅ ָ ָ ֱ ,

ӕֲ ָ ֲ ֛ ִõ ײֻ֕ , ָ ײֻ֕ ֛ ֵ ӕֲ ָָ ׯ֔ ֜ ָ ֻ ײֻ֕ ֵ ә ֵ ֻ ָ 15% ײֻ֕ , ֵ֜ ֵ ֻ֟ ӕֲ ߠ 80% ׸֮ ־ ײֻ֕ ָ ֮ ߕ̻ ֮ ָ ־ ش ֻ , ו ֟ ׬ ֜ և

ӕֲ ֛ ִõ ָ ־ , ֲ ֋ ֻ ֈ ֻ ֈ ָ ָ ֮ ֛ ־ ֮ ֺ ֛ ָ ֻ ־ ֋ ֟ , ֓ 20,000 25,000 ֵ ֟ օ

MCM/2g ָ ָ

MCM-RG/2G/1-30

׸ ֕־ (֟) : ӕֲ ־ ֮ ֓ , ߲ ֟ ׻֋ Ù ֜ և ֻ ֮ ָ ߮ ָ ן ָ ֤ ֮ ֮֓ ׻֋ ֓ ֛ ֌ ֮ ߴ֟ ֈ և ִ 000 ߕ , ֱ ֋ ֮ ֣ ֻ־֛ ֵ ӕֲ ו ָ ֛ ִ ֋ ן ،֙ ֺ ӕֲ ֟ , ִ ֓ ֋ ן ،֙ ָ פ ֵ, ֤ ֮ ״ֻ , ֮ ָ֕ ֵ, և ָߤָ ָߤ ׻ֵ, וִ 000 - ֋ ֤ פօ ָ ֋, ֤ פ ֋ ו ֮ ֻ֟ ߅ ӕֲ ֤ô֟ ֲ ִ ֟ , ־ ֟ , ֻ ׸ֻ Ӥ֕ ӕֲ ֮ ֤ ֟ ֮ ֻ ָ օ ׻֋ ߕֻ ָ ֤ ֓ , ֤ ֤ ֻ֟ , ֤ ֟ , ֲ Ӥ֕ ֮ ӕֲ ֮ ß ׸ כָ ָ ֮ Ù և ִ ֮ ߕֻ , ֮ ָ ֜ , ֮ ֤ ֜ ֲ Ù ֮ , ׸ֻ ו ֮ ֵ֓ ֮ ֛ ִ , ӛָ ָ ӕֲ ֛ ֤֮ ׻֋ ֟ , ֟ ֓ ֓ ָ ֮ ֻ ָ ֓ ָ ֕ ӕֲ ֮ ו ֤֟ ֟ , ֕ ӕֲ ֮ ָ ֛ , ָ֟ ә ו֮֟ և ׸֛ ־֮Դ ӕֲ ָָ ־֋ ו ָ ׾֤ פ ֋ ֮ ֵ, פ ֵ ֣ Ù פ ָ Ϥ ֠ ָ և , ֠ ӕֲ ֣ ֱ , ֮ ״ֻ֮ ӕֲ ֮ ֟ ֛ ӛָ ֮ ֤֮

(ֳ֬ ( ָ֕ ״) ߚ߮ )

֟ ֛ ֟ ֲ ֻ ָ ֟ ֮ ׻֋, ֲ 000 כָ ֟ ֻ כָ ״׮ִִ և , ֮ ִ ֻ ߕ ֻ և ֮ ָ ָ ֋ ן ،֙ ֛ ß֮ ֮ ֮ ֜ : פ ֤ ֤ ֓ ֋ פօ ָ 000 כָ , כָ , ֚ ֵ , ִ֟ ß֮ ӛָ ֋ ־֮ ֺ ֛߅ ӕֲ , ֮ , ֙ ֻ , ָ ֛ և ֮֓ ׻֋ ָָ ֛ ֤֮ ֤֟ և , ֟ ָ ׻֋ ߅ , ָָ ׾֮֟ ״ֵ ..... (2H ָ ֿ:)

GS-TDB/2H/1.35

׸ ֕־ (֟) : ו ָ ֕ ֟֋ , ו ָ ֮ ֻ֟ ..(ִֵ ә).. ֮ , ӕֲ ָ ױ ß כָ , ӕֲ ֮ ִ֮ ֛, ָ֕ - ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

ֵָ () : ֮־֤ ֳ֬ օ ֮ ֟ ָ ׻ ֓ ֻ ֮֮ߵ ӡ , פ֕ , ֛ ־ָ ײֻ , ֮־֤ ӟ , ߸ כ , ֮ Ϥ, ָ™ ָ™ ׾֤ ֮ ָ ֟֋ ӕֲ , ӟ ݵ ֟ ֕־ ӕֲ ִֵ ֤֟ ֟ , ֮֠ ֤ ׬ ֤֮ , ֕ ֮ ֟ , 1980 , ֯ ִֵ օ

ֳ֬ ( ָ֕ ״) : ֯ ӓ ״֮֙ ֤ ֮

ֵָ : , 1980 ݵ ӕֲ ֯ Ͼ֤ ֻ ִֵ ִָ֓ ֡ פ ֮ ֟ ,

No killing in Punjab today. ִֵ Ͼ֤ ָ , ןפ ػ , No killing in Punjab today because of insurgency and all that. ָ ֕ -֟ ֕ ֮ ָ ֟- ֋ , ו ָ ֟֋ , ָ ֵ֤ ָ֡ פ ׻ , no farmer committed suicide today. ָ ֌ ִֵ ӟָֻ ݵ - ֮ ֟ ֲ ׻֋ ӳ߸ ׾ֵ ֲ ָ ״ֻ ֮ ִõ ָ ֯ יև , ֯ יև , ֛ߋ יև ߋ ߋ יև ֛ߋ , יև ׾ֵ , ׾ֵ politicisation ׾ֵ , no criticism, no politicisation.

, ֤ ׮־ ֲ ֡ ֟ , ֲ ׬־֮ , ߮ , ־ ׯϋ֮ ײֻ ֟ , ָ֮ ֕֙ ׯϋ֮ ײֻ ֟ , ָ և ָ ֡ ֓ , ָ ֮ ֟ ָ ָ ֓ , ݵ ׾ֵ օ ֲ ֻ ֡ ָ ֓ , ׻֋ ֲ ֮ ָ ֟ ֲ ״ֻ

, ָ ӡ ׸ ׾ֳ ֟ ָ ׸ ֵֻ ֋, ֮ ֳ ״ֻ ߵև ꌙ ׸ ׾ ׻֋ ׿ ӡ ֻֻ פ ֮֕ן ָ פ ֮ Ӥ , ׸ ׌ ָ ׌ ӲӬ ӡ ֮֯ פ ֮֕ן ָ , ֋ , ֬Ԯ ֣ ӡ ״ֻ ֮֯ פ օ ֕֯ ֬Ԯ ִ ֕֯ ֬Ԯ ֣ ָ ־ָ ״ֻ֮ ׻֋ ֋ ꅠ (2 ָ ָ)

SC/1.40/2J

ֵָ (֟) : ֯ Կ ֈօ ֳ֬ , ֯ ִ֬ ӡ ו ꌙ ָ ֮֯ פ , ֵ ן ֮

( ֳ֯ן ߚ߮ )

׸ ׾ ׻֋ ֵ ֮֟ , ָ ֙ ֮ 2005 ӬЯϤ օ ֮ ֟ ָ ָ ֙ ֮ ֵ֮ ֵ օ 2005 ׾ֵ ָ ֲ ֮ ֓ , ִֵ ׾ֵ ֵ օ ָ-ָ ׻֋ ֵ ֮ ָ ָָ ֮ פ ֋..(ִֵ ә).. , Cotton Corporation of India, ߆և ׾ֵ ֮ ָ߲, ֮ ֻ ֮ ߆և ִ֮ ֟ , ֿ ֟ ֲ ״ֻ, ״ֻօ ߆և ָ ׻֙ , ֯ ֆ, ָߤ ׮ָֿ ߆և ִ֮ ײ֓׻֋ פ Ӥ ֲ ֯ ֟ , ֲ ײ֓׻ֵ ֻ , և ָ, ߆և 滛 ָ ָ ֮ ָ ײ֓׻֋ פ ֟ , פ ֤, 24 ә Ӥ ײ֓׻ֵ ߆և ֟ ָ߲ ֮ ״ֻ֮ ָ ֳ֯ן , ߓ ֯ ֋ , ׻֋ ׾ֵ politicise , יև օ ָ ֳ֯ן 韾 ָ ֕ ֳ ֻ֟ ֮֯ פ ׾ֵ ָ ӳ߸ ֣ ֻ ֡ ֮ ֟ ָ ֓ ׻֋ ֲ ֮ ֟ֆ ָ ׮ֵӡ ֋ ֯ , ׻֋ ֯ ֲ ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

ӡ ( ָ ־ָ) : ֮־ָ, ׯ֔ ֻ ֤ ..(־֮֬)..

ֳ֯ן : ֮֮ߵ ֤õ ׮־ ָ Ͽ ӲӬ ֮ ӲӬ ֳ ٙ ֤ ֋ ӡ ־ֲ , ִ֟ ֈ ãן ֙ ׮־ օ

ָ ־ָ : ָ ָ ׾ֵ ָ ֤ ӳ߸ ֓ ָ ֤ ֟ ִõ ֵ , ֟ ֕ ׯ֔ ֓- ֻ ãן , ֤ ִ֮ פ ֤ ָ ׻ Ù֮ ֲ ׌ ֟ , ׸ ֮ וִָ ׻ Ù֮ ׸ ֻ ֤ ֲ ָ ָָ ӡֵֻ ß , ײֿ 1995 ֮ ֱ֮ ײֿ , ִ ֮ ׸ָ ֮ , ָ ֱ֮ ִ ֟ ߅ 1995 ָ ָָ , ӡֵֻ ׮Ե ׻ֵ ִ ֮ ׸ָ ֮ , ׻ Ù֮ , ߻ , כÙ , ֕ ... (2 ָ ֿ:)

MP/2K/1.45

ָ ־ָ (֟) : information collect ϲӬ ו֋, ֲ , 1995 ֕ , ֮ ׸ָ ֮ , information ׿֟ ָ ֟ ִ֮ և ֻ ß֮ ߲ ֟ ֟ ֻ 14 16 ןֿ֟ ֮ ׸ָ 1995 ֕ , ֳ ֻ ֮ ֤, ִ 14 16 ָ ֮ ׸ָ ֟ , ֟ ײ֟ և , ִ֮ և ֳ ֕ ֟ incidences , ָ ׯ֔ ֻ ִõ ֲ ִ֮ ֤ և, Ӭ Ϥ, ָ™ ׾֤ , ֵ֛֮, ֻ֑֙, ָ, , ߮-ָ וֻ, Ӭ 16 וֻ ԙ 6 וֻ, ִ ֲ ֤ ֟ ֋ , ו reaction ֤ ָ ֤ ӳ߸ ֓ ԅ

ϣִ, ֯ ֤ , ֮ ׻֋ ֮ ׿ֿ ߅ Ӭ ֕ , ֟֋ , ֳ ׸ָ ָ , ãן , ֟ ׻֋ ָ , ָ information collect ϵ օ ִ ָ™ , ֕ օ ִ ֟ - ֻ ֲָ , ִõ , ד֟ 滵 ״ֻ , ߱ ֤ և ֮ ֋ , ֓ ןֿ֟ ֚ ןֿ֟ ִ֮ ֵ, , ׻֋ ׻ֵ, ִֵ ָ ߴָ և, ִֵ ֛ ֤ ִõ ִ֮ և ִֵ ׸ָ ֮ ׻֋ ֓ ־ֿ ֛, ׻֋ ׻֋ , divert ֛ ָ ֻ ֻ և, ֯ ߱ ֮ ֵ, ߱ ֮֮ ֤ և ֮ ֵ ָ ׻֋ - ָ - ׸̻, ֲ ӓ ֤ ֕ ָָ ָ ָָ ִ֮ ֋

ִõ ִ֮ ֕ פ--פ ֈӛ ֙ ֻ , ߓ ֲ ֤ ؓ֟ ӕֲ ׸ ߅ ӕֲ ׸ ׻֋ ֤õ ֕ ӛָ ֲ֕ ׻֋ ֛ ֤֮ ֕ פ , ָ ׯ֔ ֻ ו ָ ָָ , ׸ִ ֙ ֻ פ--פ ߓ ָ ӕֲ ָָ, ׸ ־֮Դ ָ ָָ, ߮ ״ֻ ֋ ֵ֤ ӓ- ֻ ֤, ֻ , ֕ ִõ ֮ ӳ߸ !

(2 /ֲ ָ ֿ:)


-MP-NB/2L/1.50

ָ ־ָ (֟) : ׻֋ ֟ ִõ ֮ ֕ ד֟ 滵 ״ֻ֮ , ֟ ֤ ִ֮ և פ ָ ֋ ӳ߸ ֮ ׸ãן ֕ և ֕ ãן ? ֕ ׮ֵ 16 ןֿ֟ ֲ֤ ß֮ , ׮ֵ 4.52 ָ ֮ ß֮ ׮ֵ 2.4 ָ ִ߮ ß֮ ֕ ß֮ 56 ָ ֤ ֲ֤ ™ߵ ֤ 21 ןֿ֟ contribution וִָ ֯ 11 ָ contribution וִָ ִ֬ ׯ֔ 3-4 ֻ ֮ ֤, 208 ״׻ֵ֮ ֯ ֕ ֤ , פ ߴ֟ 517 ֋ ֤, ֮ ׸ָ , ֕ ֮ ֛ ִ ֤ בָ ֵ ָ ֛ ӳ߸ ֮ ־ֿ

ֳ֯ן , ãן և , և , ֮ ־ֿ ֣ ̸֕Ӥ֕ ֲ ֤֕ , ִֵ ß֮ ֲ֤ 35 35 80 ןֿ֟ ִ , ֕ ß֮ ֲ֤ 106 ֳ ִ 56 60 ןֿ֟ ֮ ִ߮ ָ և ָ ֤ ֜ ֵ , ִ߮ ֜ ֤ ֓ ׻֋ ֕ ֋ ãׯ֟ ֵ ֮ , National Highways ֮֮ , ß ֮֮ , Ӿ ֮֮ , פ ׾ßָ - , ׾ßָ , ֳ ָ agricultural land non-agricultural sector ֟ urbanisation ִ ֟ ָ ִ߮ ִ߮ ָ ֜ 25 80 ָ ָ ֬׸ , ֕ 106 60 ָ ָ ֬׸ , ֮ ֛ ֕ ִ߮ ָ

ֳ֯ן , ֤ ָ ֓ , ףֵ ״-ָ ָ ׿ֿ ־ֿ ׯ֔ ֻ ֕ ״-ָ ָ ֋ ֕ ׸ãן , ֟ ֱ , ָ ? ֮ ֛ ֮ ָ fragmentation ? ֕ ֮ ׸ָ ִ߮ ֮ - 2 4 ִ߮ ו ֮ , ֮ ׸ָ ֻ֮ ־ֿ , ֤ ֵ, ֟ ֓ National Sample Survey ִ֬ ֮ ׸ָ survey ֵ, ִ 40 ןֿ֟ ֮ ֕ economic ֕ holding ״֟ ױ holding ׻֋ ־ , ֟ ֮ ׸ָ entire agricultural sector ֛ ֮ ֻ

2M/AKG ָ ֿ:

AKG-NBR/2M/1.55

ָ ־ָ (֟) : ֯ Ѿ և, ו ֮ ׸ָ ו֮֟ ֤õ , ִ ֤õ ָ ֤õ ־֮Դ پ ֮ پ , ׸ָ ֮, - ָ , ֮ ״ֻ֟ ָ ו ׸ָ ֻ , ֯ ֛ ֋, ִ ׻֮ ׻֋ - ׻ֵ , ִֻ֯ ׻ֵ , ֵ֙ ׻ֵ , ״ֻ , ׿ֿ ײֻ Ԥָ ֣-֣ ֯ߴ ׻֋ ֲ֕ ֮ ꅠ

ָ, ֤֕ ֤ ֲ ־ֻ Ϭ֮ ӡ , ֲ ֮, ִ ֲ ֤ importance ָ פ ֵ օ ֟ ֓ כ ִֵ everything can wait, but not agriculture, ו ו ֤ ֤õ , ֟ ֓ ן ֮ ֤, ֲ ־ֻ Ϭ֮ ӡ , ֲ ֤ ֮ ָ פ ֵ, ׸֮ ꌙ ָ ֛ ֤֮ פօ ֕ . ֲ ָ ֟ ׾֮֬ ָ ֛ ֤֮ פ , ֟ ֓ ָ ־ֵ ֻ ׸֮ ׌֙ ꌙ ֲ ֤ ֤֮ . ֲ ֲ פ , ֲ ׸ ״׮Ù ꅠ ֛ ֻ ִ ꌙ ֛-֛ ꌙ , ׸ ״׮Ù . ֲ וִָ , ֲ ֟ ߅ ֲ ׮Ե ׻ֵ ֲ ײֻ֕ ֤ ֤ Ѿ ֕ ϛ ֮, ֲ Ѿ ײֻ֕ ֮ ׸ãן ָ ߅ ֲ ֮ ײֻ֕, ߕ Ѿ , ֲ ֤ ֜ ֌׸ ִõ ֲִֵ ꅠ ָ ׮Ե ִֵ . ֲ ׻ֵ օ ־ֻ ֤֮ ֤ ֲ וִָ ߴ֟ ׮ Ѭ ָ ֛ , ֲ ߮ ׸껵֮ ֓ ָ ֛ և ߅ ֤ . ޵ִ ӡ և ӛ ָ ꌙ ֲ ֋, ֲ ֌׸ ִõ ֋, ֟ ָ ߅ ֲ ֕߾֮ ִ . ޵ִ contribution

ָ, ֤ ߛ ָ ֟ ߅ פ ֲ և, ׮ֵ ו֮ ֻ և ״ֻ , ו֮ ִ , ׌ , ו֮ ִ Ԯ . ָ ֟ ֕ ֵ֤ 90 ָ 3-4 ߮ ֋ , ֲ ֛ ִ߸ ֟ ߅ ֕ ӕֲ, ׸ Ù 1966-67 ׮ , ֤֮ . ׌ ֵ֙ ָ . ޵ִ decision ׻ֵ ׌ ֵ֙ ϓָ ׿֯ ׸ֻ֠ ֵօ ֮ ֤ ֳ ָ ״׮Ù ָ ״ֿ ؙ ևԅ (2 ָ ֿ:)

PREVIOUS PAGE

NEXT PAGE