PREVIOUS PAGE

NEXT PAGE

-HK/YSR-MCM/3.00/1W

KUMARI NIRMALA DESHPANDE (CONTD.): So, Sir, my first suggestion is, I don't know if that can be incorporated, that one finds that there is an element of communalisation in all these agencies. So, if we can orient them in a different way, we will have less complaints to deal with. I would also like to say that, unfortunately, I don't know why, but one finds communalisation in the Police Force of many States to such an extent that it becomes really difficult to work in that area. I would also like to say that during the Gujarat carnage, we, as civil activists, found that the National Human Rights Commission was a source of moral strength to all of us. I would like to compliment the National Human Rights commission, especially its Chairman, for this. But its recommendations were not honoured by the then Government. And sending it back to the State Government, if such a situation arises, it would be disastrous. It was only the NHRC during that period that was fair, that was trying to help the people at the grass-root level. So, sending it back may not be proper in such extraordinary situations.

Last but not least, I would like to say that the NHRC should have more teeth and more status. I feel that a retired Chief Justice alone should be appointed. Because, in those days, we could find that our NHRC Chairman was respected all over the world. We live in a world where status does count, so, it would be better to have a retired Chief Justice. Also, along with that, I would request that the NHRC should be given more teeth. Thank you. (Ends)

ֻ (֜) : ֮־֤ ֳ֯ן , ֮ և ֮ ָ , ָ ֮־ָ, ֲ ӡ ֮ Ù؛ ׸ӛ ָ ׾ָ֓ , ָ ֮ ָ֮ ә ֟ , ָ Ù؛ : "The Committee is of the view that an express provision needs to be incorporated in the amendment to clear the apprehensions and doubts that the Chairperson may tend to misuse the power in making excessive delegation. The Committee, therefore, recommends that in sub-section (4) of section 3 of the Principal Act, the words "except judicial functions" may be added after the words "such powers and discharge such functions of the Commission."

ָ ָ֮ ָ֮ ָ , ָ ִ֟ ־ ו ָ ֿ ׾ָ֓ ֮ օ ׌ ֮ ֛ ׳֮-׳֮ ׸ãןֵ ֻ֟ ӳ־֮ ֮ ִ ߿֮ ׬ָ פ ֵ ָ և օ ־֮֬ ֵ ָԮ ׬ָ , ִ֟ ָ پָ֓ ִ ״ן ֲ ׾ָ֓ ִ ֆ Ӥ ã֮ ׻֋ ֿ ׾ָ֓ ӡ ִ וִָ , ֿ , Ù؛ ׸ޛ֮ (1X ָ ֿ:)

GS-VKK/1X/3.05

ֻ (֟) : ֳ֯ן , ֤ ָ ײֻ ӲӬ ֮ ׾ָ֓ ֮ ׻֋ ֛ ֮֯ ָ פ , ׻֋ ֯ - ֮־֤ ӿ֮ ֜ ֣-֣ ֮ ָ ׾ָ֓ , ֮ ׾ָֿ , ָ ֛-֛ ֮ ׾ָֿ, ָ ָ ֮ ׾ָ֓ ֮ ׻֋ ָ ֮ ׾ָֿ פ , ֵ֤ ִֵ ֮Ӥ ֲ ָ ׾֮֫ ׬־֌ , , ֤ ֟ ָ ֟, ֵ֤ ֣ ֵ օ ãן

ֳ֯ן , ֮֮ߵ ׿־ָ֕ י ã֟ ֮֟ ָ ָָ ֳ ָ וִ׸ ӳֻ֮ ֻ ׌ ӡ ׯ֔ כ ӡֵֻ ֣ ֟֓ߟ ֟ , օ ֲ ӿ֮ ֜ ֣-֣ ֮ ֜ , ִ ֵ þ֬߮ ָ ֮ ! ֮ 1993 ֮ ֤ 13 ֻ ֤ ӿ֮ , ߓ ֮ ֙֋ և , ֤ ־ ֯ ן ׾ֵ ֮ ׾ָ֓ ן ֮ ֟ ֤ ֮ ֮ ׻֋ ֯ ִ ֮ ֮ , ֮ ӿ֮ ֮ և ײֻ ָ , ߿֮ ָ פ ֮ և ֟ ֟ և ֟ ֟ , ֚ ־ ׬ ָ , ֳ ן ֵ , ָ ֵ ִ֮ ֛ ֲ Ͼ ֮ ״ֻ֮ ֟ - ֜ , ֮ ֟ ׻֋ ! ֟ ֮־ ׬ָ ָ , ֮ ֛ ֮ܵ , ׮ֵ և Ͼ֌ֆ ָ ֮ ߾֮ ֵֻ ָ ֮־׬ָ ֵ , ָ ֮־ ָ ׾ָ֓ , , ָ ֕ ׻֋ ֤ ־֕ ֮ ן

֮־ָ, ָߵ , ֲ և ָ ֑֟ , þֳ׾ ָ ֟ ָ և ߿֮ ָ ֮ ׬ָ , ׻֋ ׬ָ , Ͽ ִ֮ ֛ ? ׻֋ ֮ ֵ ֲ ӳ־ , ֮֮ߵ ׿־ָ֕ י ֮ ֟ ָ ֟ , ֕ ӿ֮ ִ֬ ָ ָ ֮ ӟ֮ 100 ֓߮ ֳ֟ ֮־ ߾֮ šִ ֤ ָ ãׯ֟ ֋ (1և ָ ָ)

SC/MKS/3.10/1Y

ֻ (֟) : ֻ ֮֟ , , ָ ׮ֵ ֮֟ ֲ ָ և ߿֮ ָ ׾֤ ֮ ־֮ ׳־׌ ֳ þָ , ױ ֟ ֮־׬ָ ׮֬Ը ֮ , ו֮ ֟ײ ן ? ֕ ֮־׬ָ ֵ ֮֟ ָ ֻ ֙ֆ ָ יֵ ֲ ָ ֮ -1 , ִ ӳ־ ? ו֮ ӿ֮ ָ ׾ָ֓ , ֵ֟ , ֣ ׾ָ֓-׾׮ִֵ , ֲ ֮ ֵ -1 ֮ ֟ , ӳ־ ? , ָ ֯ ׾ָ֓ ִ ֟ ֵ , ִ ָ ֟ ־ ׾֙ , ִ ӳ־ ָ ׾ָ֓ ָ ָߵ Ͼ ָߵ ? ֕ ֯ ׾ד֡ ӿ֮ ָ ֟ 13 ֻ ֤ ֮־׬ָ ָ ׾ָ֓ ֻ , þ֟ , ָ ׾ָ֓ ֛ , ֮ ߮ Ӭ ָ ֛ , ָ ָ ֮ ֤ ָ ֟ ? , ָ ֤ ִ֮ ָ ֮ , ֮ þ֟ ׻֋ ִ ׮־ ß־ ֋ , ָ ׻ ֟ ָ ׾ָ֓ օ ֟ ֵ, ֻ, ָ ׾ ֻ ֮ Ӭ ׮־ ֕ , ָ ֮ ӟ֮ ֟ օ ָ ֻ Ի ָ ָ ׾ָ֓ , ß ָ , þ֬߮ Ӭ ؓ֟ ? ֟֓ߟ , ֮־׬ָ ֠ ־֮֬ ײֻ ֵ - þֵ֟ݵ ָ ָ Ӭ ָ כ , ׾ָ֓ ִ ֲ և ׸ ֜ , ֲ ׮ֵ և ׸֋ և ֻ ָ ˱ֻ ? ָ ׾ָ֓ ֺ և, և ָ ˱ֻ , ֮ , ׾ָ֓ ׾ֵ ֮µִ֡ , ן ֮־ָ ™ ׾ָ֓ , ֵ , ֮ïן ױ ֮־׬ָ ֻ ָ פ ˱ֻ , ׾ָ֓ ? ֲ ֮ ߿֮ ׬ָ פ , ֲ ֟ ֟ ׾ָ֓ ֲ ֜ , ֲ ߿֮ ӟָ™ߵ ׬ֵ ָ ׾ָ֓ ־֮֬ ֵ ..(ִֵ ә)

֮֮ߵ ֤õ : ָ, ïߓ

ֳ֯ן : ïߓ

SHRI SHREEGOPAL VAYAS: That is all. It is not a maiden speech. Sir, I take note of it. I have to make a few more important points.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: I have given you six minutes more than the allotted time.

ֻ : ֯ ׮־ ֲ ׬ָ ֵ ־֮֬ ӟָ™ߵ ׬ֵ ָ ׾ָ֓ , ָ ָָ ׸ , ױ ָ ָָ ߿֮ ָ Ӭ , ו ׬ ӟԟ ׾ָ֓ ӳ־ , ׬ֵ ִ ꅠ (1 ָ ֿ:)

MP/TMV/1Z/3.15

ֻ (֟) : ָ ֻ Ӭ ָ ֵ , ֛-֛ ׸ , ָ -֟ֆ ִ֮ ֻ׿ֵ , ָ ֮־׬ָ ֵ , ֮ , " և ֮ " ֮և ׿ֵ , ָ֮ ׻֋, ֮ ãֻ ד֟ פ ֵ ִ ӣ ׬ָ ٴ֟ ָ, ֻ -Ӧ ָ Ӭ ֮ ד֟ ãן ֻ֤ ֮ ֟։, Ӳ ֋, ָ Ӭ ֮ ֬֟ ָ? Ӭ , ָ ֣ , ֮ ׾ֳ֮֕ þָ , ָ - ֮ ׻֋ ָ ָ ֮־ߵ ӡ ֟ , ֲ ױ פև ֟ , ָ ׮ֵ פև ֟ ,

, ָ ׬ָ ֟ ֻ֤ ָ ֣ ָ֓ , ֮־֟ ו֟ ֻ ֮֮ ָ Ӭ ָ ֣ , ֕ ß֮ , ֻ֤ ߻ , - ֮ ־֮֬

, ־ ֮ ֵ ֮ , ִ , ־ , ֟ ִ և - to inquire into this and to inquire into that. ֌ֵָ , ֮ , ׾ֵ ָ ִ ֮ , to pronounce its concern over obvious violations of human rights? ׌ ײ ־쮙 ֱֻ , ֳ ָ ֮ , ? ֛-֛ ֤֯֋ ֟ ־ ֲ ֯ , ֯ ֟־ָ ן ֮ ׻֋ ֟ , ָ ֮ ֙ ֟ , ׌ , ִ֕ ֮ ֲ ִ , ױ , ֮֮ ߿֮ ֛-֛ ֙ֆ ֤ ֟ ? ׬ָ פ ֋ ? ֲ כ׾֕ㆻ ׻ֲ֙ ֟ , ֣ ֛ ֯ ֲ ־ ֛ ֛ ׌ , ֵָ֬֟ ׿ֵ֟ ו þֳ־ , ָ ߿֮ ׮ֵ֮ ׻֋ ӓ ֵ֓ ֟ ֮ , Ӯ ֱֻ ֮ ֛ ֟ ևԅ ָ ֮־׬ָ ֵ þֵ , ו ָ ָָ ֵ, ו ָ ־ָ š ׌ ֣ , ֨ ֡ , ָ ֮־׬ָ ֵ þֵ ׬ָ ׻֋ ֟ ? ָ Ͽ

߸ ָ ֮֮ߵ ֕ ߸ ָ ָ ׮ֵ ׾ãׯ֟ ϤԮ יָ ָ ׾֮֫ ָ ׮ֵ ߸ כ ϤԮ ֮ և ? ֕ ֮ ָ ׾ãׯ֟ , - ֓-֓ , ֓ ׸ָ ֮־׬ָ ֕ ָ Ծ , ֻ ׬ָ ֟ ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֕ ֟ ָ ׾ָ֓ ד֟ ָ ־֮֬ ֋Ӆ ֯ ֮ ß ϵ ߤָ ֮ (2A/ASC ָ ֿ:)

ASC-VK/3.20/2A

ֻ (֟) : ֻ-֕ ӿ֮ ֵ ֵ ׾ֹ ß , ָ ֯ ׮־ , ֯ ָ ֿ֣ߑ پָ֓ ָ™ߵ ׬ֵ ־֮֬ ֋ , ֿ , ֮ ׌ , -1 -1 , , 'the countries where people of Indian origin or pravasi Bhartis live' ֯ ׾֮֟ ֯ ֟ ָ ֺ ֮ ꅠ ֮־׬ָ ׸׬ ָ ֳ ׸ ֛ , ֬ ӟ , ֤ ׿ֵ֟ ָ ֬ ӟ ָ ֮֟֋ ֛ ָ ֮׮ ִ , ֱֻ ֮ þֳ־ þֳ־ ߻ ֮ ֯ ֳ , ֮֟ , ֯ ֳ ־֮֋ ֣ ֳ ׬ָ ָ , ׌ ׮֤, ׻֋ , þֵ ָ ֮־ ׬ָ ֵ ֜, ִß ׮ֵ ָ ֤ , ָ ׸ ׬ָ օ ֮֯ ִֵ פ, ׻֋ ֯ ֮־֤ , ֮ ã֮ (ִ֯)

SHRI TARLOCHAN SINGH (HARYANA): Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, we are discussing about the Human Rights Commission and the amendments being recommended by the Government. Sir, violation of human rights is now an international problem and with the increase of education among the public and with awareness about such Commissions and laws there is always an eager demand on the part of the public to appear before any such commission to get relief because the excesses, as it has been noticed, are mostly by the police or by the Government officers against the people. Although we have made this Act in 1993, I am very happy to say that our National Human Rights Commission has earned good reputation All over the world, when people talk about the role of India in providing relief, we always get an appraisal in the world because successive Governments have always selected chairpersons and members of the Human Rights Commission from the best available persons in this field. I would request the Home Minister to consider that when you appoint these commissions, they are all recommendatory bodies because the Government cannot afford to have a parallel authority to take a decision. All commissions, the National Human Rights Commission, the Scheduled Castes Commission, the Tribal Commission, the Minority Commission, the Women Commission, the Backward Commission, they are all recommendatory bodies. But to make them effective, the Government has always tried to give them special authority and that authority came to the Scheduled Caste Commission, the Tribal Commission, the Minority Commission. You give Cabinet status to their Chairpersons so that the functioning of the Commission vis-a-vis the Government machinery becomes more effective because if a Commission is headed by a Cabinet Minister, when you call the Government machinery, they give better respect. (Contd. by 2B)

RG/3.25/2B

SHRI TARLOCHAN SINGH (contd.): So, here also, the Human Rights Commission, being headed by a retired Chief Justice, carried much weight. The Human Rights Commission, being a supreme body in India, when they summoned any official and they called for records; naturally, the general habit of the public is to see who the person who is sitting on the Chair is. So, if a retired Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is heading it, then, naturally, the respect of the Commission increases. I do not know the reasons why we are now going to dilute this authority of the Commission, whereas the need was to strengthen it further. By strengthening it further, you would have gained much more effectiveness and efficiency in the Commission. But we do not know the reason behind this. We want to change its Chairmanship from a retired Chief Justice to a Judge, even in the States. It is, of course, up to the Government to do what it wants. But, looking at the functioning of the Commission, I feel that we should not try to dilute it in any way and give less authority to the person heading the Commission.

Secondly, Sir, in this Commission, there is a provision that they do not take any case which is more than one year old. This, I think, is a big deficiency in the working of the Commission because one year is a very small period for a person from anywhere to go and appeal before the Commission. Various incidents have taken place, and it has not been possible for the affected persons or the public to go before the Commission within a year. And, there are some important cases which occurred before the formation of the Commission in 1993. These cases are still pending in the Courts. People expect that the Human Rights Commission should be given some special exemption to listen to these cases such as the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. That is still a black spot on our system, and the people wanted that this Commission also should probe into this. Similarly, people wanted that this Commission should go into the Hashimpura massacre where the minority people were killed in Uttar Pradesh. This case is 19 years old. There are some cases where huge killings have taken place, but this Commission cannot intervene. So, some special provision should be made whereby in cases where mass killings had taken place, we should refer such cases to this Commission. I am happy that there are certain good amendments being made, that you are allowing the Commission to visit jails, because it has been noticed that there are maximum human rights violations taking place in jails against the prisoners. Of course, the Commission should visit the jail premises without informing the authorities in advance. Otherwise, the officials would get alert and everything would be set in order by the time the Members of the Commission visit the jail premises. So, if the Members of the Commission visit the jails without informing the Government concerned, then, that will bring better results. You are also allowing the National Human Rights Commission to transfer cases to the State Human Rights Commission.

Sir, as I mentioned to you earlier, the Commission is a recommendatory body. You have now mentioned in the amendment that the Commission can recommend to the State Government for paying compensation to the victims either partly or wholly during the enquiry or after the completion of the enquiry. Also, there should be some clause in this Bill to make the recommendations of the Commission binding on the Governments concerned. It is very often seen that the Commissions make recommendations, but the States do not implement them. We must ensure that the recommendations of this Commission are properly implemented. It is indeed good that you have provided that any complainant can get the Inquiry Report of the Commission. That will be very helpful, and we are also happy that the Inquiry Report of the Commission will be published.

Sir, another provision which has been recommended is that there will be dual membership; that is, one person can be a Member in two States. I don't think this can be workable because the States have a huge number of cases pending with them, and also, the working of the State Commissions has not been up to the mark. Most of the States had no Chairperson, and in some States, there are still vacancies. So, if they are now allowed that one Member can represent two States, then, the efficiency will go down. Sir, I must bring, though you, to the notice of the Home Minister that there is a provision in the Act that the National Human Rights Commission will have Associate Members.

(Continued by 2C)

 

TDB/2C/3.30

SHRI TARLOCHAN SINGH (CONTD.): And, those members are Chairpersons of the Scheduled Castes Commission, the Minority Commission and the Women Commission. Sir, for the last two-and-a-half years, due to a small technical reason, the Chairperson of the Scheduled Castes Commission was debarred to attend the meeting of this Commission. Only an Ordinance was to be issued because this Commission was bifurcated into the Scheduled Castes Commission and the Tribal Commission. So, by issuing a small Ordinance, the Chairpersons of both the Scheduled Castes Commission and the Tribal Commission could be allowed to attend the meeting of the Human Rights Commission. Now, this amendment is coming after two-and-a-half years. For the last two-and-a-half years, neither the Chairperson of the Scheduled Castes Commission nor the Chairperson of the Tribal Commission could attend the meeting of this Commission. Sir, there is a provision in the Act as to why these associate members are there. They are there because they represent the Scheduled Castes, the minorities, women and these are the major sectors of our society. As per the provision, every month, a meeting will take place. But, the experience shows that the Chairperson of the Human Rights Commission holds only three or four meetings in the whole year. So, the provision of the Act to hold a meeting of the Commission every month is not being implemented.

Secondly, Sir, you appoint these associate members so that they are aware of all the things which are going on. They are not the whole-time members of the Commission. They work in their own offices. But, they should be aware of all what is happening. But, there is a distinction. These members are there only to attend the meeting, and in that meeting, all other criminal cases, all cases where the Commission is taking steps on that, these members are debarred to know or to discuss those cases. So, I also want to bring this to the notice of the worthy Home Minister.

Sir, I have one more point to make. Because of the Act made, Kashmir is out of the purview of all these Commissions. The maximum violations are taking place in that State, and no Commission can go there and take notice of it. So, this provision may be discussed sometimes how to bring that State into the purview of all this Commission.

Sir, in the end, I will request the Home Minister, through you, Sir, that we should try to give more teeth to this Commission, make it more respectable in the eye of the world over because human rights is an issue at the international level. Maximum media coverage comes for the Human Rights Commission and the human rights violation. India will get a good name, if this Commission is more effective, and the Chairperson of this Commission is more and more effective and respectable. We should not try to minimise or in any way lower the status of the Chairperson of the Commission.

Sir, in the end, I would like to bring one more thing to the notice of the worthy Home Minister. Sir, eight years back, the Supreme Court referred the Khalra Committee Case to the Human Rights Commission. It was reported in the Supreme Court that more than 2000 persons were cremated without taking notice of who they were. They were cremated in Amritsar in 1984. The case went to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held an inquiry, and issued order to the Human Rights Commission that the Commission should now go into the detail to find out who those persons were and what had been done. So, this case is pending with the Human Rights Commission for the last nine years. Only this year, or, a few months back, they have been able to give a report of 700 persons, and that too, only a compensation. Till today, the Human Rights Commission has failed to give any relief to the complainant or to launch any prosecution. I recommend that we should ask the Human Rights Commission that this is a case which was discussed and sent by the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court's order has not yet been implemented. The people of Punjab are very angry over this issue because thousands of people were killed at the hand of the police, and shown as if they were in the shoot-out or missing. So, that case should be decided, prosecution should be launched against the defaulter and compensation should be paid to 2000 people who are already in the list given by the Supreme Court. Sir, with these words, I conclude. Thank you, Sir. (Ends)

(Followed by kgg/2d)

2D/HMS-KGG/3.35

Ӭ ֤֕ (ָ Ϥ) : , ֮־֟ Ӹ ӿ֮ ׾֬, 2005 ִ֣Ԯ ֛

, ָߵ ׾֮֬ ׿ָֻ ֲ 0 ׸ Ӿ׮ ׬ָ ֣-֣ ׻ ׬ָ Ϥ ֕ ָ ׻֟, ֟ ̻֕ ִ֕ ׻ ׬ָ ֮ ֋ פ ִ֕ ֮֟ ׳֟ ָ ֮ ׻ ׬ָ ִ ֟ ִ ָ ׻ ׬ָ ֟ ָ ֕ ִו ׾ִ֟, ٣ ׾ִ֟ ֣--֣ ִӟ 㻴-֤ ָ ׻֟, ֟ ̻֕ ׻ ׬ָ ֮ ֋ פ ֬ ָ߲ ̻֕ ֮ ָ ֮־׬ָ ֵ ֟ ֮֮ ו֮֟ ׬ָ ֮ ֮֟ ָ , ֳ ֮־׬ָ ֵ ֮ ָ ֟ ֵ ד֟ ֟ : ֮֮ߵ ӡ ֮־׬ָ ֵ ֯ ֮֮ ֺ ׻֋ ϓָ-ָ ֯ ֮ ֮-֮ ֮ ֺ ֣--֣ ֵ ׌ֵ ֜֋ ֮ ־ֿ ֵ þ֟ӡ ׮¯ ֵ כ ㌟- ִ֕ ֵ

ֳ֬ ( ָ֕ ״) ߚ߮ .

, ϟֿ ָָ ֵ ׌ֵ ֮֜ ֵ ֮-֮ ֮ ִ , ӿ֮ ׾֬ ִ֣Ԯ ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY (PONDICHERRY): Sir, I rise to support the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Bill, 2005, moved by the hon. Home Minister. Sir, Justice Ahmedi Committee made certain observations for improving the National Human Rights Commission as also the State Human Rights Commissions. On that basis, the amendments have been brought forward. There are some arguments made as far as the Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission is concerned. There are arguments and counter-arguments in this regard. Sir, the Chairman, according to the existing provision, should be the retired Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Some suggestions have come to say that since very few retired Chief Justices are there in the country and since the age-limit is 70 years to occupy the position, it would be very difficult for the Government to identify the retired Chief Justice for this post. Therefore, the amendment has been sought by the hon. Home Minister to consider retired Judge of the Supreme Court on merit.

But I found that a controversy is made and I do not see any reason in the controversy, because the people who have got meritorious service in the judiciary who have been the Chief Justices who were committed to the human rights have been occupying the position--Justice Ahmedi, Justice Venkatachalaiah, now Justice Anand, were all senior Supreme Court Chief Justices who occupied that position. Now, by bringing forward this amendment, the Government would be in a position to identify the human rights activists who are in the service and after the retirement, they can be considered. (contd. by kls/2e)

KLS/2E-3.40

SHRI V. NARAYANSAMY (CONTD): Secondly, for increasing the facilities to the Commission, a provision has been made. Sir, today I would like to bring to the notice of the hon. Home Minister that there are some States where in the name of religion people are being tortured. It is in the sense that it is in the name of anti-conversion in some of the States. I do not want to name those States where in the name of anti-conversion certain people belonging to a certain religion are being harassed by certain religious activists. This is going on in some of the Northern States. When the State Human Rights Commission intervenes, the State Government interferes in it. Some of the State Governments are not allowing the State Human Rights Commission to investigate, to go to a particular area to see whether in the name of anti-conversion people are being harassed or not. Sir, it came to my knowledge and I also brought it to the notice of the authorities. Every person has got a right under the Constitution to profess any religion. The only thing is that no one should be compelled. If I want to profess a particular religion nobody should prevent me from embracing that religion or accepting that religion or following the principles of that religion. But unfortunately, Sir, in one religion in the name of majority religion some people are trying to suppress the minorities. I brought this to the notice of the hon. Home Minister that there is interference in the activities of the State Human Rights Commissions when they go for investigation to find out the facts. People praying inside have been attacked. This type of activity, which is going on, is a clear violation of the human rights. There are several such cases taking place in various districts in a particular State. It is unfortunate when such a situation arises because law and order is a State Subject and the Central Government cannot interfere. Therefore, this is a very serious matter. I want the hon. Home Minister to intervene when a State becomes a party to this kind of attack on the people of minority community in a particular State. We will have to approach the Central Government only to give protection to these people because the State Government has become a party to that act. I want the hon. Minister to consider that aspect also. It is good that there is provision for reconstitution of the State Human Rights Commission. In our Standing Committee also we considered it and we have accepted it. Sir, one thing on which I would like to seek clarification from the hon. Minister, some other hon. Members have already sought, is regarding the District Magistrate referring the matter to the State Human Rights Commission and also the National Human Rights Commission. This needs reconsideration by the hon. Minister because the Human Rights Commission is an authority which has to see if there is any violation of the human rights or not. If a magistrate who is a lower authority is referring a matter to the higher authority, for this there should be some reason as to why they are doing it. But, unfortunately, that has not been explained in this Bill. I want the hon. Minister to consider that aspect. Sir, day in, day out the human rights activists are complaining to the Central Government to give teeth to the National Human Rights Commission. It is good that the hon. Minister has made a clear provision to inspect jails and see conditions there and also inspect the places where an occurrence has taken place and going there for an on the spot study and submit a report. (Contd by 2F)

-KLS-SSS-KLG//2F/3.45

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY (CONTD.): Sir, my submission is that the Report of the Human Rights Commission has to be taken very seriously by the State Government and the Central Government. Sir, in some of the States I find the appointment of the Members has not been done in full because in some States some Members are there, in some States even the head is not there, Members are only working. This is the situation which has to be avoided. As far as the National Human Rights Commission and the State Human Rights Commission are concerned, there should full quorum of the Chairman and the Members so that there can be effective functioning by the Commission. Therefore, I want, that also to be considered by the hon. Home Minister. This is a very important amendment that has been brought forward. I support the amendment that has been brought by the Hon. Home Minister and the UPA Government has been giving utmost importance to the Human Rights. I wholly support the Bill, with the observation which has been made by me. Thank you, Sir.

(Ends)

ֵָ߮ ִ ( ֬ Ϥ ) : ֳ֬ , ײֻ ֳ 17 ӿ֮ ֋ , ִ ֱ ӿ֮ ִ֣Ԯ , ײֻ ֻ ֛ ߮ ׬ָ ו ֵ , ָ ֵ , ֠ ֵ ֱ׸ ֮֮ ָָ ׻֋ Ӭָ֮ ָ Ӭָ֮ , ß־ ֵ ֱ׸ օ

֮־ָ, ָ ֋ , ו֮ ֤ ֮ ֟ ֵ ֵ֮ ״ן , ׻֋ Ù ֤ ־ פ ؙ , ִ ״ֻ ֮ , ִ ״ֻ ֵ ָ ָָ פ ָ, ֵ , ד־ ׻ ׮֤ ׮ֵ׌ ָָ , ָָ , ׻ ֵ ֱ׸ ָ ָ ׮ֵ׌ , ד֟ օ ֤ ״ן , ֮ ָ ־ פ , ָָ ֮օ

֮־ָ, ֵ֟ ֵ וÙ ׮֤ , ֲ ֵ ׾ֵ ד֟ ֟ ָ ֵ וÙ ׮֤ , ײֻ ד֟ ϟߟ օ ׻֋ ָ ׾ָ֓ ֮ ױ, ֵ ֮ ׸ , ֪ׯ ֮ ־ã ߮ ߮ Ӥ ָָ ־ֲ , ָָ ־ֲ , Ӭָ֮ ׻֋ ״ן ֱ׸ ָ ָָ ߮ ߮ Ӥ ־ֲ , ׸ ןִ ֮ ֮ ִ ֱ׸ և ֵ ׸ ֤ ֙ ָ ֋, ׾֮֬ ֳ ֋, ٻִֵ ֋, ִ֟ ָ ֵ ֵ ׸ ٻִֵ ֙ ָ ֟, Ӭָ֮ ־ ָ ָָ ֵ ׸ ٻִֵ ֟ , ֵ ׬ָ ߬ ٻִֵ ֮ ׸ ָ ֟ , ß־ ֵ , ָ , ߮ ֵ ָ ֵ ֱ׸ ֮ ֟, ָ ׾ֿ ׮־ ֵ ׸ ֤ ֮ ß־ , ָָ ָ ָָ , þֵ ֵ ׸ ֤ ָ , ֱ ד֟ օ

֮־ָ, ֲ ֣ ײֻ ӿ֮ ֋ , ִ֣Ԯ , ׮־ ־ פ , ָ ָָ ׾ָ֓ ֯ ֵ ߮ ֟ ֋, ֵ ֱ׸ Ӭָ֮ ֮և ָ ֯ ָ ־֮֬ , ָ ֱ֟ ߅ - ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

2/ ָ ..

AKA-NBR/2G/3:50

0 ϳ (֕ã֮) : ֮־֤ ֳ֬ , ֮֯ ׬ָ Ӹ פօ ֤ ֮־ ׬ָ ֓ ֯ ׾֬ ™ ֮־ ׬ָ Ӹ, Ӿ֬Ԯ ֿ׌ ׻֋ ו֮֟ ָ ֓ԋ , ֿ׌ ׻֋ ו֮֟ ӿ֮ ֋ ֵ ו ־֮ ֮֋ ֋ -- ™ߵ ֮־׬ָ ֵ ֕ ֮־׬ָ ֵ, ֵ֮ ־֮ ׸ ִ֟־֮ , ׻֋ ׬ ִ֣ ֜և ֋, ֮־ ׬ָ Ӹ ӿ֮ ׾֬, 2005 ָָ ָ ֵ ֵ , ִ֣Ԯ ׻֋ ֛

, ֵ ֚ ֵ, ™ߵ ֕ , ָָ ׬ ֋ ִ ׾ֿ ײ֮ , ™ߵ ֕ ֮־׬ָ ֵ ָ ִֻ ֮, ֮־ ׬ָ ֵ ׬ ִ֟־֮ ֮ ד֟ ן, ֮֕ן ֵ ״ֻ, ־֮ ֵ ֵ ֤õ ֮֮ ߠ ־ã ׾֬ և ֯ ߤ ־ã ׬ ד֟ ן, ֮֕ן ָ߲, ֕ ׻֟ ִֵ , ׾ֿ ִ , ו֮ ֮ ٣ ִו ֲ֕ ֻ֟ ָ ߛ ֛ , ֵ֤ ֻ֮ ֜ , ֵ֟ ֵ ״ֻ օ

, ׾֬ ӿ֮ ֤ ִ֮ ֮ ׾֬ ֟ , ׾֬ ӿ֮ ֟ , ֌ ֺ ָ, ֟ ֳ , ֤ ֤õ , ָ ֋ , ֯ ׾֬ ׸ , ֮־ ׻֋, ֮֟ ׻֋, ֵ פ֮ ׻֋ , ֮ ֿ֌ ֮ ׾֮֬ , ֤ , ׾֬׵֋ , ֮ ִ , ׮ִֵ-֮ , ֻ֟ , ׻ , ֮ , ִ֕ ֚ , ִִ ־ãֆ ӟԟ פ ִ֕ ֮־֟ ߛ ㌟ ׻֋ ׿ֿ ֋, ־֕ פ ֮־ߵ ָ֬ ר , פ ֮־ ߛ ִֻ ָ֜ ֋ פ ãן ָ ֮ ׾־ֿ ֛ ׮֬׸ ֮ ׾֬ ֮֋ ֋, ֮ ֵ ך ֋, ֵ֮ ֳ כ ״ֻ

('2h/sch' ָ ָ)

SCH/3.55/2H

. ϳ (֟): , ™ ָ ָև ָ ֳ ֣ , ֲ כ ֳ ״ֻ, ָ ֵ ״ֻꅠ ׻֋ ֺ ׮ִֵ ֮ ֮ פ ֋, ׾֬ ֋ ֋ ־ ӿ֮ ֋, ֮ ָ ӳ־ כ , ֲ ֳ ״ֻꅠ ׻֋ ־ã ֮ ֺ ־ֲ֤ ׬ ֵ֮ ֋, ֵ ִֵ ߴ ׮֬׸ ֻ ֮, ־ã ׮׿֟ , ו Ӳ׬֟ , ֵ כ , ߛ ִֻ ִ֮ ֮־׬ָ ן ,

׾֬ ֟ ָ ִֻ , ֵ ֋, ӓ ׬ָ ֵ օ ׮ָ ׮ָ ׻֋ ֵ ִ , , ֮֮ ֵ ֻ ׮ָ ֵԾ ֮ ִ֣ ? ָ ָ ֋ ֟ ָ ֋ ֋ ָ ӳ߸ ׻ֵ ֮ ֟ , ָ ׻ Ӹ ֮֟ֆ ֟ ֜ ֲ ֟ ִָ֓ և , ֮־֟ כ פ ׻ Ù ָ ׸ãן ֮ ֋, ֲ ױ Ӹ ָ ״ֻ? ֕ ִ֕ ׸ãןֵ ֮ և ׻ ֟ ִ ֤ ֳֵߟ ֟ ? ֮ ״֡ ִ֟? , ִõ ֟ , Ù , և , ־ ױ ׻ , ֳ ֮-֮ ָ׵֟ , וִ׸ ָ ָ ִ ֤ ָ߲ ֤ ֮ ֮֟ ߛ ֮֟ ֛ , ־ֲ֤ ? , ֲ ־ֲ֤ ׮׿֟ , ֲ ׌ פ ָ כ ָ֮ , ֟ ֲ וִָ ָ ֟ ֛ , ֲ օ ִֻ ׌ כ ֋, ï ֋ ־ Ԯ ׻ֵ ֋ , , ִ ָ ֟ ִִ ֮ ־֕ ֳ ״ֻ ֟ כ ׻֋ ֵ ״ֻ ֟ , ֕ ״ֻ֟ ӲӬ ֟ "֕ ֜ ֵ, - "

׾֬ ߔ ־֮ ߤ ֳ ״ֻօ ִ ߕ ֮ ֵ ָ כ ִֻ ֱ׸ ־ã ֵ ו֮ ׾ֹ ׸ , ָ ָָ ָ ֻ֟ ֵԾ ֋ ׸ ָ ָ ֋ ֻ ֮ ִֵ ߴ ׮֬׸ ־ פ ָ ֟פ Ӳ׬֟ , ָ ׳ָ ֓ ״ ֓ , ֛ ָ ߛ

ֳ֬ ( ָ֕ ״): ϳ , ֯ ִֵ ֵ

. ϳ : ֮ ֟ ֵ ׮Ե , ־֮֬ ֮ ׸ ָ֬ ֕ ״ֻ , , ִ ־ã

, ד֟ ן ֮֕ן ״ֻ, ֕ ״ֻ, ׻ ֵ֟ ״ֻ, ߤ ׾֬ ׬ ϳ־ ָָ ֨ , ׻֋ ֤ ו֮ ׾ָ֓ ־ ֋ , ו ׬ ϳ־ ֮ , ָָ ִ , ܟ ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

2J/VP/MCM ָ

PREVIOUS PAGE
MAIN

NEXT PAGE