PREVIOUS HOUR

-KLS-SSS-ASC/1X/3.00

The House reassembled at two minutes past three of the clock,

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN in the Chair.

---

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Hon. Members, the discussion on Doda is going on in the other House. In the meantime, there is another important business, The Delhi Laws Bill, it has been decided that first we will take up The Delhi Laws Bill. Immediately after the discussion is over, we will take up Doda here.

׾ֵ֮ יָ : ֛ ֣ ֋օ ..(־֮֬)..

SHRIMATI SUSHMA SWARAJ: Why, Sir?

DR. MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI: What is going on there?

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: The discussion is going on in the other House.

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ָ, ֤ כ֮ , ֯ 3.45 ו֋ ..(־֮֬)..ֲ ֋ ֋օ ..(־֮֬)

THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI S. JAIPAL REDDY): The Home Minister will come soon after the ...

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: One minute. We were finding out the availability of the hon. Minister for Urban Development. It was first decided that we would take up The Delhi Laws Bill. So he was not available. So we thought that...

DR. MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI: That was not the issue.

MR. DEPUTY CHARIMAN: No, it was the issue.

֋, ָ כ֮ ..(־֮֬)

DR. MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI: That was not the issue. The issue is that the hon. Minister for Home or Defence or the hon. Prime Minister was requested to be here during the discussion and we were waiting for all that. This whole adjournment business since morning has been because of that.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: You are right ֵ , ׻֋ ָ-ָ Դ 껵֮ ׮ ֳ כ֮ , ֤ ״׮Ù ֋ ֋ פ ײֻ 쮙 ײֻ ָ ֈ ֻ ..(־֮֬)..

ָ ֻ ӛ־ֻ : ו֋ ..(־֮֬)..

. ֮ : ֲ ׻֋ ֮ ו֋ ...(־֮֬)..

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : פ ײֻ ֕ ֻ֟ ׻֋ 12 ֕ ֛, פ ײֻ ״׮Ù ֟ , ֓ ֤ ֯

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: On the one side they want the Home Minister here and on the other side they do not want a discussion. This is the attitude when the Minister is here? I would like to know...

ֳ֯ן : ״Ù ִֵָ , ֈ ֻ֮ ׻֋ כ֮ , ָ כ֮ Then we will have to abide by that, otherwise, it will be very difficult.

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ָ, פ ָ כ֮

THE DELHI LAWS (SPECIAL PROVISION) BILL, 2006

THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI S. JAIPAL REDDY): Sir, I beg to move:

That the Bill to make special provisions for the areas of Delhi for a period of one year and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, as passed by Lok Sabha, be taken into consideration.

Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, as the hon. Members are aware, the large immigration of people from all over the country over the years into the National Capital Territory of Delhi has resulted in a huge growth in demand for residential and commercial space as envisaged in the master plan, 1962 notified under the Delhi Development Plan 1857. The Government adopted planned development of Delhi through large-scale acquisition of land and development and disposal of such land through the Delhi Development Authority for meeting the needs of the people for residential, commercial and other spaces. However, the problems and operationalisation of the plan, poor enforcement and inadequacy and unaffordability of shelter, particularly for the poor have led to growth of slums, unauthorised construction, large-scale commercialisation of residential areas, especially, along the major roads. (Contd. by NBR/1Y)

-SSS/NBR-NB/1Y/3.05.

SHRI JAIPAL REDDY (CONTD.): The Government of India has taken note of these deficiencies and has now placed emphasis on the need for alternative policy options to secure proper development of Delhi.

With this objective, the draft Master Plan for Delhi has been prepared with the perspective of 2021. About 7,000 suggestions and objections received from the public are under examination. Finalisation of the Master Plan is likely to take sometime. In the meantime, the Government have constituted a Committee, headed by Shri Tejender Khanna, former Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, to suggest a comprehensive strategy to deal with issues relating to unauthorised constructions and misuse of premises. Its recommendations will be taken into consideration in finalising the Plan.

As regards the problems of those living in slums and Jhugi Jhonpris, the Government proposed to deal with the matter with requisite compassion, and the need for proper shelter and basic services for the urban poor. But, given the dwindling availability of land for relocation of slum dwellers, it has become imperative to revisit the current policy and look for more sustainable solutions for their rehabilitation.

There are also a large number of street vendors in different parts of Delhi. While the local bodies are formulating schemes in pursuance to the National Policy on street vendors, it has to be ensured that schemes are realistic and take into consideration not only the concerns of vendors and squatters but also citizens' access to public places. This is also required sometime for finalisation.

In the meantime, a number of representations were received by the Government against demolition and ceiling of premises by the local bodies. Several hon. Members of this august House as well as the elected representatives of the Delhi have been demanding for intervention to sort out the complex issue that has led to the present situation. While, a large number of persons are affected by the on-going drives, at the same time, there is a wide divergence of public opinion and views to deal with this issue. These have been taken into account while finalizing comprehensive and balance policy on each of these complex issues. This process would involve ground level survey, collection of requisite data, its analysis and consultations with the resident societies by the local bodies. Professional expert organisations may also to be involved to formulate a sustainable strategy. This is a time-consuming exercise. So, Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, it will be noted that for the finalisation of the norms, policy guidelines and feasible strategies in respect of problems mentioned by me earlier, a period of about one year will be required. While this exercise is taken up by the Government and its agencies, it is necessary and desirable to maintain a status quo in respect of these categories of unauthorised developments existing as on 1st January, 2006, so as to prevent unnecessary and avoidable hardship and harassment of the people. The Government, therefore, considered it necessary and desirable to enact the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Bill, 2006, for this purpose.

Sir, in the facts and circumstances of the matter as mentioned by me and in order to meet the aforesaid objects, I move for consideration of the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Bill, 2006, as passed by Lok Sabha. Thank you.

(Ends)

The question was proposed.

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ (֬ Ϥ) : ֳ֯ן , ֛ ϓ׻֟ ̻֕ - " ָ ",

, ֯ ָ ִ ֋ -

" ֮ ̱ ,

֋ ֲָ "

ײֻ ̻֕ ׸֣ ָָ ̱ ײ֮ ײֻ և, ֓և ײֻ ֮ פ ָ ָ֤ ֋ ׯ֔ 6 ߮ פ ִ ֓ ֮ , ֮ ߻ , ֙ ֻ ֵ 1Z/AKG ָ ֿ:

AKG/1Z/3.10

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ (֟) : ֻ ֛ ֟ -㻴 ֕ ֵ ָָ ִ ߕ פ - ֙ , - ֕ ֙֙ ӵ ִֵ ֳ ֕ ֳ 10 ֤ 9 ֤ - ֕ ָ ָ , Ϭִ֮ӡ ָ ֟ߕ ߮ ֟օ ֮ ָ ֮, ֵ֤ ָ ֵ֤, ֆ ָ ֋, , , ֤ ָ֕ ָ, ֤ ӱ ֛ ֟ - ֤ ֮ ׾֯ , ӡ ֤ , þֵ ײ֮ , ו֮ þֵ ״ , ײֻ ֮ , ׸ ߅ ֯ ֤ ָ ֲ , ֤ߵ ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ ֮ ֵ ֲ ֵ ֿ , ֯ ״ ֮ , ֮ ״ ָ ֳ ֯ ֢ ׾֯ ׾֯ ֟ , ֢ ֯ ׸ ֯ ִ֮ ? ׻֋ ֤ ֟ ׻֋ ֯ - ״ פ ֮֟ ֯ ܿ

ֳ֯ן , ֯ ֮֟ ֤ ֮ ֬֋ , ִִ ֬֋ ָ ֈ sine-die adjourn օ ֬ ֈ recess , House for all practical purposes ֮ ָ ֈ sine-die adjourn ֋, ִ prorogue Prorogue ֤ ordinance ֵ  ֈ prorogue ֵ, ordinance ֵօ ָ -㻴, ָ - ֮ ָָ ֟ ߅ ֤ ֟ 10 ָ ֈ ׻ֵ ֵ , summons 21 פ ֟ 10 ָ פ obituary ֈ ֮ , 11 ָ working day ָ ײֻ ֯ פ ֟ , Ӥ ָָ ߅ פօ ײ֮ ױ ױ ײֻ ׸ ֵ, ײֻ ׮օ 11 ָ ֲ ֮ ֤ ֮ '֓ , ײֻ ', ' ׻י ׾ֻ, ֋ ײֻ' ֲ ָָ ߅ ֮ ֯ ײֻ և ָ 10 ָ ֮ ׻ֵ ֵ , 11 ָ working day , ָ ִ, ו spade work , home work , ָָ ߅ ײֻ ָ circulate ߅ ֯ߴ ײֻ ֳ , ֯ߴ ײֻ ֕ ֳ ? ֲ פ ֟ ֟ ִõ և - ִ֮֬ օ ִõ 6 ߮ ֯ ִ֮ ֋ ֛ , דֻ , ֛ ָ ֮ ϤԮ , demonstrations , ֯ ײֻ ָ ֯ ײֻ פ ֟ ֯ߴ ֳ ׸ ֟ , ׸ ׮׿֟ ׸ ꅠ ֕ ֲ ֤ߵ ֵ ӡ ָ ֟ 12 ֕ ֛, , ָ פ ײֻ ׸ , ֻ - פ , - ״֮֙ ׿ , ׿ פ ֟ և ֮ ֮ ָ ֟ , ֟ ߛ ֻ ػ Ì֛ ֋ ֮ ָ ߻ ֻ ֋օ ֟ ֯ , ֟ ߛ כ׻ֿ֮ Ì֛ ֋ ׿ֵ֮ ֛ ֻ ֋ ָ ֓ ֟ ִ ָ ֋ꅠ ãן

ֳ֯ן , ֟ ײֻ ֳ פ ׸ ֵ օ rule , propriety ִ ߕ ָ ߛ ֟ ֻ ֵ parliamentary intent Parliamentary intent ֻ ײֻ , ֳ ײֻ ׸ ֵ օ ӵ ׮־ָ, ־ָ ֵ, ׻֋ ֕ ֳ ־ָ , ֛ פ - , פ ػ

(2/֋֋ ָ ֿ:)

2A/HMS-USY/3.15

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ (֟) : ֙ ָ כ߿ , þ әֻ֮ (ֵ ִ ָ ) ֋ ֮ ߻ ֵ ָ ֮ 000 ֵ ־֮ Ͼֻ ֮ ߻ ֲ ٻִֵ ә ֟ ֵ, ֳ ײֻ ׸ ֵ, ֕ ֳ ײֻ ׸ ָ ™ן ßָ ֋, ׬ָ ִ֮֮ , ֲ ־֕ ? ֵֻ֯ ֕ ֺ ׸ ָ כ߿֮ ָ ֯ , כ߿֮ ָ ? ֯ ֮ ֻ֟? ֯ ָ ײֻ ֮ ֋, ײֻ ֈ , ָ ֈ ֋ ߓ פ כ߿֮ ׬ָ כÙ ָ ? ָָ ִֵ ֮ ֻ ? ײֻ , -- פ Ӥ פ , ױ ׮־ָ ׾־ָ ػ

, ײֻ ָ ֳ֯ן , ׸š , Ùߙֻ֮ כ ָ , ֻ - ֟ ֯ ײֻ ָ֤֟ ֲ " ׾֤Ù؛" ßֻ ֲ ֲ ײֻ ֟ ׾֤Ù؛ ײֻ ָ-3 ָ֬-2 ֯ "Subject to the provisions contained in sub-section (I) and without prejudice to any judgement, decree or order of any court..." ӿ֮ ֯ 'Notwithstanding any judgement, decree or order of any court...' ָ '׾֤Ù؛' ֟ '׾֤ֈ ׯϕכ' ... (Interruptions) Should I yield?

SHRI S. JAIPAL REDDY: Sir, this corrigendum was carried out by the Lok Sabha. The corrected version does say 'notwithstanding'. I do not know where the confusion is arising. It may be verified...(Interruptions)

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ֋, , ' Û ֵ ֳ' ׻֋ ײֻ ׻֋ ָ , ָ ֟ ӡ ֮ ֟ ֟ ...

SHRI ARUN JAITLEY: Can we have a copy of that, even if one copy is available?

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ...(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : ֯ , '׾֤Ù؛' ?

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : '׾֤ֈ ׯϕכ'

ֳ֯ן : '׾֤Ù؛'

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ָ ӡ ֮ ׻ֵ ִ֮֬ ֵօ ֟ ֯ ߓ ֛ ֋ ֯ ֟ ֮ ֲ ׾֤Ù؛, ׾֤ֈ ׯϕכ

ֳ֯ן , ָ™ ָ֮ Ӳ׬֟ ٛ ӡ פ֮ ׻֋ և ߅ ָ֮ ָ ו ׻֋ ָ™ ֮ ٛ ׮ֻ օ Ordinance number one of 2006 օ Ӥ ֲ־ֻ , ִ ׻֋ ִ֕ ֟ פ ٛ ӡ פ֮ ׻֋ և , ָ ӡ ־ þָ ׻ֵ ֟ ֺ ָ þָ ָ ׻ֵ , ֮־֤ ֲ־ֻ ֤ ֋

ӡ ֯ - ױ ֯

Status quo as on 1st January, 2006, ױ ֲ ֯ ֤ ֯ ־ֲ ֋ ֲ ִ֮֬ օ ֮ ߻ , ߻ ? כ׻ֿ ֵ ו֮ ֮ ߛ׾֙ פ , 40 ָ ֮ ߛ׾֙ ײֻ ֟ , ָ--ָ ߛ׾֙ ִ ֋ פ ֋ ָ ֟ ֮ ֻ ֓ ֋ ߛ׾֙ ָ , ָ ? ָ ֮ ߻ ֵ, ? ׻֋ ֺ ӡ ֮ ָ ָ - ִֻ פ ֋ וûי ә ӡ ֯ ִ֬ ֤ ָ ֟ ֵ ֟ ִ֮֬ ֳ , ׻֋ ֤ ֺ ӡ ָ ֕ ֳ ִ֮֬ ֋ (2 /ߋ־ ָ ֿ:)

PSV-VP/2B/3.20

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ (֟) : ָ ִ֮֬ ӡ ָ ֕ ֳ , ײֻ ֋, ֻ֕ ֜, ָ ־֟ ֵ֤, ß ֵ֤ -- ָ ײֻ ִ֣Ԯ ӡ ן ֮־֤ (ִ֯)

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (™ߵ ֮֕֬ , פ) : ָ, ײֻ ֮ ׻֋ ӡ ֮־֤ ָ֤ פ ֮֟ ־֮ֆ ִ֟ ו ָ ָ֮ , , : ߮ ו ָ - , - ֤, - , ֮ ֛ ָ , ֮֟ ߓ ו֮֙ ״ֻ , ײֻ ֵ ֋ ָ ֟ ֋ ׻֋ ֯ ָ֤

ֿ ו ָ פ ׻֋ ָ֛ ֻ ֮ פ ׾ ֯ ָ , ֮֯ ָ֛ ֲֵָ ָ ӛ ֛ פ, ו֮ ִϤ׵ ֿ ָ , ָ֛ ֻ ߓ ִ߮ פօ ֕ ׿֋ ָ ׮ֿ֮ ֛ ָ ֮ ...(־֮֬)...

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ֯ פ ָ ֲֵָ ָ? ...(־֮֬)...

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ֲ ֯ ״ֻ ֵ ״ֻ ֯ ֣ ָ ߮ , ֯ ָ֮ , ֯ ֻ֋ ֯ -- ָ ֻ--ֻ ׮ֻ֮ , פ ֻ ...(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : Ͼֻ , ֯ ָ״֙ , ָ ֯ ֲ ֟ ֮ ߙ ֟ ...(־֮֬)...

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ָ, ֻ ֟ ...(־֮֬)... ֤ ־֕ ׮ֻ֮ ֛ ...(־֮֬)...

ֳ֯ן : , ֯ ָ״֙ פ ...(־֮֬)... ֯ ֮ ߙ ֟ ...(־֮֬)...

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ָ, פ פ ߅ פ ׯ֔ꠠ 100 ֻ ߸-߸ ߅ ֲ֤ 15 , ֕ ߲֮֠ - פ ֋ ꅠ ֮ ׿ֵ֮ ֮֋ ֮ ׻֋ ָ օ ֮ ֓ ֻ֮- ׻֋ ֮ , , -- ָ ߅ ָ ֮ פ ֜߅ פ ָ߾ָ - , פ ֕ ֜ þֺ ֮ ֮ ״ֻօ ֋, ֮ ׻֋ -- ָ , - ָߕ љ ֻ ֋ ֮ פ , ֤ פ ױ ֜߅ ֤ ֻ֯ ߕ և, ֲ և ײֻ ׮ֵ ֙, ֤ ֆև ׮ֵ ֜ ֻ և ױ ֻ ֜ 000 ֮ פ ָ פ ֜ ߅

ָ ֕ פ ו þֺ , ߲ þֺ ֮ ָ ָ ָ ֋, ֕ פ ֵ ָ ׿ֿ ߕ פ ֮, ָ פ ֲָ ׿ֿ , ֱֻ ־֕ ֮ ֿ ֕ ײֻ ֯ ֋ ִ , , ו ָ ֯ ֟ օ ? פ כÙ֮ פ ֱ ֻ פ ֱ , - ֋ , ׻ פ ָ֯ פ ӛ ֟ -ָ ߕ , ֱ פ כ -ָ ָ֕ ֟ ָ ָ פ ֱ ִ֟ ֻ ָ֤֮ , (2/000 ָ ֿ:)

2C/klg-pk/3.25

ߠ ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟) : , ֻ ߱ , ֮ , , ָ ֵ ו֮ ֮ , , ֛ ָ ֮ ֓ ו֮ ֮ ߻ , ֻ֟ ? ׌ ֮ , ֱ ֮ ֲֻ֟ , ׻ ֻ ֟ , ֻ ֟ , ָ , ֲ ֮ ֟ , ֻ֟ פ Ӥ ֮ ִ օ ו ָ ֵ, ֮ ߻ և, ָ֮ ֵ, ֲ֮ , ֕ ײֻ ֵ, ״ֻ ߱ , ִ֮֬ ׮ օ

, - և , ָ פ օ ֮ ֮ և , ֲ פ ָ ָָ , ָև ָ , ֤ ֵօ ֮ ֵ, ֮ ֵ ֕ ֻ־ָ ָ ָ ֙ ֲ פ ָָ և, ߲֮ ָָ , ֬ ָ ־ ָ ֙ ָָ և, ֮ ֮֟ ֻ ׻֋ ָ ׿ֿ , פ , ֋ , ֲ פ ִֵ ֛, ײֻ֕, ֮ ׾ ׮֙ߕ ևՅ ֵ ָ , ֮ ָ ָָ ֻ ײֻ֕ ֮ פ ֵ, և פ ֵօ ָ - ӛÙߕ , ֱ ׻֋ ִ ׻֋ ֮ ֛, ָ֮ ֛ ֮ ָ , , ֮ ֓

, ֌ , וִ ֮ ִֵ ϯֻ ֆև ֻߕ , ֋ ִֵ ָ ߻ ֟ ָָ , ֮ ϯֻ օ ߕ ָָ ֮ פ , ֮ ֲ֕ , ֙ ߅ ָ ֻ Ù ܵ ӡ ֤ ֋, ֮֟ ֻ ִֵ օ ֙ Ӥ ֯ ֛ , ָ ܵ ӡ , ־֕ , ִ ִ ߵ֟ , ִ ָ ֻ ׻֋ ֤ ܵ ӡ ֮ ֵ, ֻ ׻֋ ױ ֵ ֲ ӳֻ, ֤ߵ ִ פ ևԅ ֮ ִֵ , ׻֋ פ ֻ ִ ? ֲ֕ ִ , , ٴ , ֻ ֮ ֻ , ֲ֕ , בָ , ֯ ֌ֱ ׻֋ ֤ ָ ָָ և, ו ֟ , ֌ , וִ ָ ߻ ֟ ָָ , ֮ ֮ ־֮Դ פ ֆև ֻߕ ֋ ֮ 괲ֻ ֵ , ־֮Դ ӕ օ ֟

, ֤ ֤ߵ ִ , ו פ ։ ֛ ־֕ և , פ ֻ ֣ , ֮ ֛ , ֲ ֤ߵ , ִֵ ֛ ֯ ֵ ֿ , ֟ ֓ ֕ , ߅

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ֓ , ײֻ օ ..(־֮֬)

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ֯ ?

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ? ײֻ օ

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ֯ ֓ ?

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ֓ .. (־֮֬) ..

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ֮֯ ֵ֓ օ ָ פ ֟ ֮֟, ײֻ פ ֟օ ֲ ֯ ..(־֮֬) ..

ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ : ևԅ ֯ , և, ן֛ ߅ .. (־֮֬)

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ָ פ ֋ ָ ֳ ...,  ٻִֵ ߓ

2/ ָ

AKA-PB/2D/3:30

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟): פ ֟ פֆ ֯, ָ פ ֮ ִ פ 녠 ֮ ִ פ ֕ , ֮֯ ִ פ֮ , ָ ֯ ִ ֕ ֻ פ օ פ ֻ 껵֮ ֵ, ִֵ ߕ ָָ , ׻֋ ֕ ߱

(ֳ֬֠ (0 00 ׸֮) ߚ߮ )

ָ, , ? ֛ ߲ ֟ -- ֮ ߻ , ױ׾֙ ׻֋ ֋, ֵ ֻֻ օ -߮ - י ֮ և -- ֻ , , ָ ֤ ꯾ևә פ ֋ פ - ә ָ ָ ָ֮ և ֵ פ ֆָև Ù֮ ִõ , ָ, ִ ֲ פ פ ָָ , פ ׮ֻ֯ ֮ , 000 , 0000 , ִ ֠ , ִԻ ֵ , ߕ ִ օ ָ, ֕֟ ֛ ֱ և ֜ :-

"It has been proposed that the MCD will provide space for setting up office of the Committee at India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. The staff for secretarial and clerical services to the Chairman and other members of the Committee shall also be provided by the MCD as per the requirements of the Committee. The honorarium payable to the Chairman of the Committee has been proposed at Rs. 5,000/- per sitting and for the unofficial members of the Committee at Rs. 3,500/- per sitting, the expenses for which are to be borne by the DDA. With regard to conveyance, it has been proposed that the Chairman and unofficial members will be entitled for reimbursement of actual amount of to and fro transportation and other charges."

ָ, ֕ ߕ , ָ , ו֮ ӟִ֕ , ָ ֮֮ ֣ ֵ ֮ פ ֋, ֺ ? פ֮ ׾ ֵ֮ ֟, ֱ ו֮ ֮֋, ֵ֮ ֟ ? ֻ , ָ , ֲ ׌ ׸ϕי ߕ ָ ֋, ׸ָ ֋? ֻ ֕ כ ֮ פ ֵօ , -- ߻ , Ӥ , ֮ Ӥ , Ù ױ ߻ ꅠ פ ꅠ ָ, ָ ֯ ֻ , ֤ ֵ ֻ ֯ ״ֻ֠ -- 'ִ ֈ֕ ߻ ', פ ֤ '׌֙ ֻ ߻ ', ָ פ ֤ 'Ù ו֮֟ ױ ߻ ', ױ '80 ָ ֮ , ߻ ' ִֿ , ֕ ֮ פ? פ ֕ , פ ֮ ? ֮ ֮ ֮ ֮֮ ֻ ֟ , ֮ ָ ֟ , ֮ ִ֮ ֟ , ָ ֟ , ֲ ֮ ֮֟ ֮ ֮֟ ֮ ׿ - ..(־֮֬)..

SHRI YASHWANT SINHA: Sir, I have only a very simple request to make. We should not discuss the conduct of the Judges here in this House and comment on their ... ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI JAI PARKASH AGGARWAL: Am I doing that, Sir.? No; I am not doing that. ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI YASHWANT SINHA: That is not done. This has never been done. ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI JAI PARKASH AGGARWAL: I can discuss the judgement. ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI YASHWANT SINHA: The conduct of Judges and comments on the judgements are not discussed in the House. ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI JAI PARKASH AGGARWAL: Why? Why not? ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI YASHWANT SINHA: That is exactly what the hon. Member is doing. ...(Interruptions)... Sir, I asked for your ruling. ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI JAI PARKASH AGGARWAL: It has been done so many times. Sir, it has been done so many times in the House. ...(Interruptions)...

SHRI YASHWANT SINHA: But it has not been done in the language in which you are doing. ...(Interruptions)...

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ֟ ֯? ֮֟ ֯ ֟օ

(Followed by 2e/SKC)

SCH/SKC/3.35/2E

SHRI YASHWANT SINHA: I am not talking to you. I am talking to the Chair and it is for the Chair to decide.

SHRI JANARDHANA POOJARY: Sir, I am on a point of order...(interruptions)... We agree with the hon. Member. But what is happening in the courts? What are they doing? Are they performing their duties? ...(interruptions)...We also need to see whether they are crossing their limits. Now, Sir, the hon. Member has stated the plight...(interruptions)...

SHRI RAVULA CHANDRA SEKAR REDDY: Sir, we are not discussing the conduct of judges here.

SHRI JANARDHANA POOJARY: Sir, the hon. Member has talked about the plight of the people. The point he has made is very clear -- whether the court has taken cognisance of these facts. That is what he has said. He has talked about the sufferings of the people.

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIAN): Mr. Janardhana Poojary, when you discuss the judgement of the court or when you say anything about decrees of the court, you should be a little more careful. Your language should be proper.

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ: ֮ ֵ, ֱ ֮ , , ָ֮ , ֓ ֛ ָ ֛ , ָ , ֮ ߻ և , ֋ ...(־֮֬)

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN: Of course, you can explain the miseries of the people, but don't criticise the court.

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ: ָ, ֲֻ֟ , ֲֻ֟

ָ, ֟ ָ ֮ ̵ֻ ֟ ָ , ָ ָ, ֟ ָ ָ ִ ױ ? ֕ ָ ָ ָ օ ׻֋ ֮ٛ , ֮ ו֋ ׌ ָ֮ ֋ כ פ ָ ֮ , ֮֟ ꅠ ֲ ٻִֵ ֟ , ֟ ? ױ ֋ ײֻ? ֕ ײֻ ֳ , ֤ ֲָ ֓ ֮ ֋? ٻִֵ ָ ־֕ ֮ ֮? ָ, ׻֋ ֵ , ָ, ָ ָ ֮ ֟ פ ֕ פ ֟, ֵ֤ ֻ֟ ꅠ ߕ ֮ ֈ ֵ , ӕ , ֟ , ֲ ֵ֤ ֟

ָ, ևә ֿ ӡ , פ ֻ , ִ ֻ , ָ߲ ֮֟ ִ֟ , פ ֮֟ ߓ , ߕ ֮ ו ָ , ֺ ָ, ֯ Ù ֮ Ӆ Ù ֮ ֮֯ ֮֟ ߓ ִ , Ӥ , Ӥ ֕ , ֲ פ , ֳ Ӥ

SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY: Why are you talking only about Chandni Chowk? Talk about the whole of Delhi.

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ: ־ Ù֮ ߓ ...(־֮֬) Sir, Please, just give me few minutes. ָ, ٿֵֻ ׸ ֮ ߸-߸ כ ٿֵֻ ֜ ֻ ֋ ֕ ָ ֛ ֯׸ ָ ֤ ָ֕ , ָ ֛ ֯׸ ָ , ֈ ֮֙ ß֮ ֟ ִ֮ ָߤ ׻֋ ֮ Ӥ ִ֮ ָߤ ׻֋ ֮ ֤ ָ֕ ֮ , ֲ ֕ þֺ ֤ ? ׻֋ ֯ Ù ֮ ׌ؙ ׻ ..., ָ ֯ וֻ ָ ִ , ֲ ̵ֻ ֯ ָ Ӥ ֻ ֮ ֛օ ֯ ֤ ָ֕, ֈ ֮֙ ֻ ֮ ֛ꅠ օ ֕ ײػ , ٿֵֻ ֕ ̸ֲ , ָ֯ , ̸ֲ , ָ ֯׸ ֮ ֻ ֻ , ̸ֲ ֿ ï׿ֵֻ ߮ ָ ִ ׻֋ , ָ ֯ ̺

ָ և ֙ , ֮֯ ׮ֵ״֟ ָ ֿ ו ָ ֮ ֮ ָ ֲ߻ פ ָ-ָ - ָ ֮ ׻֋ ׸ָ ֜ ֋, ָ ָ ֮ ׻֋, ׮ֵ״֟ ׻֋ ֤ؕ ֮ , ֻ ֮ ׸ ׸ ֮ ֻ , ֿ ֮ פ ...

MCM/2F ָ

MCM-SKS/2F/3-40

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟) : ֿ ֮ օ פ ָ ֯ ׮ֵ״֟ פ 000 ָ ָ 000 000 , ו ָ פ خ ִ 000 օ ֲ ֤ 000 ֱֻ ׻֋ 000 ֮ ִ ָ , 000 ׿ֿ ֮ ִֻ֯ פ ָ ֕׸ ֵ ꅠ ֻ ִ߮ ֟ , , ֮֟ ֕ 25-25 ֻ ֋ ״ֻ, 000 ִ ֿ ֯ ִ ִ ֵԾ ָ ֯ ׮ ֋ ֮֯ -֛ ָ , ׮ ֲ -֛ ִ օ ֕ ֯ Ӹ , ׻֋ ֮֯ ֮ ꅠ ֿ ֯ ˻ ֮ ֋ ָ֮ ꅠ

ָ, ֻ ֟ , ֻ ױ׮ֿ֮ ֻ ֮ , ָ߮ ֮ , ֮ ֋օ ֻ ׸ ֕ ֯ ֵ ֻ ֻ ײػ ֻ ָ , ֯օ Ӿ ֙ ֻ , ֮և ׾ֻ ֋ ׻֋ ָ Ӥ әױ ִָ ֿ ֯ ֮ օ

֛ ִõ פ Ù ֈ פ ֟ , ׸Ù ֟ , ָ֯ ֟ ֤ ֛-֛ ָ ֋ ָ, ֋ ߱, ֋ , ִ Ù ֈ פ 50 ֻ ֮ ָ , 15 ָ , 20 ָ , 25 ָ ֕ ֛ פ ߻ , Ӥ ꅠ Ù ֈ פ ֺ , ִԿֻ֋ , ָ֤֟ ֻ֟ , ִ ֟ օ ֋ ? ֋ Ù֮ ָ , Ù ֈ ֋, ӓ ֋ ָ ״ֻ ֟ ֕ ܟ ֺ ֿ ֯ ֮ ׮ֵ״֟ ׻֋ ׻

ָ ޛÙֻ ׸, ֤֕ , ֕֯֟ ֵ ֵָ֕֯֟ ֻ ֋ 1962 ִ߮ և ֵ ٿֵֻ ִ߮ , ֯ ߓ ִ ֯ ָ ָ֮ ָ ֵָ֕֯֟ , ֕ , ֲ ֮ ֮ ֲ ֵָ֕֯֟ ֮ ׿ֿ ߅ ֿ ֮ ֮ ֋ ݵָև ֋ ֵ֤ כ ß֮ ֲ ֛ ꌙ׮ ߸ ֵָ֕֯֟ , כ ֲ ֛ ֮ ֛ כ

ָ, ֙ ֻ ׻֋ ֮֯ , ָ֮ , ָָ ׻ ֟ , ׻ ֻ ֻ֟ ֮֯ ׮ֵ״֟ , ֮֯ ֻ ָ -, ָָ ָ ׮ֵ״֟ ֮ ֮ ֯ ֵ֤ , ֵ֤ ֙ ֻ ֮ , ָ ׻ ֮ ֮ ꅠ ו ָ ֮֯ ֻ ׻֋ ֮ ֮ , ָ ֙ ֻ ׻֋ ֯ ׻ ֮֮ ֮ ״ֻ

ִõ , ׻֋ ָ֮ ֮ ֛ פ , , ֿ ֻÙ ˕, ׮ֵ , ֯ ָ ֻ֯ ִָ ֛ ֛ (2G ָ ֿ:)

GS-SK/2G/3.45

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ (֟) : ָ, ֟ ӡ ֮ ֮ ָ, ֮֯ ֯ ֛ ָ , ָ ٴ ãֻ , ׮ִ ֙ , ָ ߮ ֻ ֮ פ "߻ ָ" ִ ֿ ִ ֙ ָ֮ ֙ ָ ֮ , ׻֋ ֛ ֵ , - ִֿ ? ו ־ Ӳ׬֟ ׸ Ӳ׬֟ , ָ ֮ פ ָ ָ ׸ פ , 50 ֻ ֮ ֮ , ׸ ԟ ֟ ? ֯ ׮ִ ֙ ? ֮֕ ߻ ? ֬ ֲ ָ֕ , ? ֯ ߻ ָ פ ? ֯ ֙ ? ֯ ֮֟ ֯ כ , ֯ ֟և ? ָ ֵ, ? ֟ ֯ ָ ֻ ֻ , ָ פ ֮ , ֣ ָ ֣ ֵ? ֺ ׻֋ ׻ ֵ֮Ӆ ٴ ãֻ - ֻ, ߮ ֻ ֮ פ ן , ײֻ ֵ Ӥ ֻ ֮ - ߜ , ӛ ֟ , ׸ָ - ߜ , ֯ ֛ ? ׮ֻ ֛ ? ֟ ߛߋ ׻ ֮֟ ֮ ָ ? ָ , ָ , ֯ ֵ ? ֮ ֺ ֿ , ֯ ָ߲ ֤״ֵ ֤ , ֯ ֺ ֤ ֵ פ ֻ , פ ָ ֻ

ָ, ָ ײֻ ֮ , ו֮ ֮֠ ֵ , ֕ ֛ ָ ֵ , ו֮ ֵ, ו֮ ֮ ߻ և , ָ ֻ ֯ , ֯ ֳ פ־ֵ ӓ , ״ֻ , ׻֋ ֯ ֮ ָ ֮֮ ֮֯ ֱ 1֮־ָ, 2006 , ו֮ ֮ ֵ , ֵ, ֓ ֛ ָ ֵ , ֮ ߻ և ? ֿ ֯ ָ߲ ֤ ָָ ӡ ו֮ ֮ , ֯ פ־ֵ, פ־ֵ, ָ ֮ ֮ ֮

ָ, ֛ߋ ׸ ִ ֵ ׻ ֵꅠ ֻ ָ ֯ ו֮ ױ׾֙ פ , ߴ֟ ִ þָ֕ ֟ , ױ׾֙ פ , ֯ ݾ ל..(ִֵ ә)...

ָ, -߮ ևә ߮ ߮ Ӥ ֮ Ӥ , ֮ ָ֯ ֤ , ָ ײֻ ֱ , ֮֯ Ù , ֯ ֛ , ֮ ߻ և , ֮ ֵ ֯ -ָև ߕ , ָև ׸ ߲֮ ָ ָ ߲ ֻ֮ ׻֋ ֛ פ ָ 25 ָ , ִ ֯ ֮ ָ ֵ֮, ֌ , ߻ ֟և - ָ ? , ׻ ֯ ָ ָ ֻ, ߻ , ֌ ֻ֮ ֤ ֯ ִ 25 ָ ßֻ , ִ ֿ ӡ ֮ ָ ֻ ֵ ֯ ֻ , ֯ ֤׻ֵ, ִ ״ֻ

ָ ִ ֈ , פ ִ ֈ , ָ , ָ ֮  ֻ , ָָ ָ ו֮֟ ֤ߑָ ֮֮ , ֮ ֤ߑָ ֮, ָ ׮֙ , ִ ֈ Ӥ פ ֵ, ֮ ֛ ָ ִ ֈ , ֤ ָ ָ , ֕ ? ֲ֤ פ ֯ ָ ֵ ָ ֤ ָ ֤ , ִ֟ ֯  ֻ ׸, ֯ ߻ ־և ָ ִ ֈ , ו֋ ֯ ָ ֤ Ùߙ , , ֮ ֺ ֲ ִ߮ ֻ ֛ , ָ ֛ , ָ ֻ ֵ ָ ֤- ׻֋ ßֻ , ׻֋ ֯ ֮ և ו ״ֻ

ֳ֬ (000 ׸֮) : ߕ

ֵ ֿ Ͼֻ : ָ, פ , ׻֋ ֮ , ߱ פ ֻ , ֮ פ ֜ פ , ױ ָ֮ ֮, ׻֙ ֈֻ ֮, ֻ ֵ߅ ָ ׮ֵ ִ֮ ֮ ֋ פ ֕ ֵ֤ פ ִ כ ֺ ֛߅ פ ֻ , ָ ֮ , ֮ פ ֻ - ֤, - ֵ , פ ֻ ָ ̸ ߱ פ ֛֟ ׻֋ ִ ֿ ӡ ָ פ ֻ , ֵ ֣ , ֯ ֺ ָ ֤ ֮־֤ ֵ (ִ֯) (2 ָ )

YSR-SC/3.50/2H

THE VICE-CHAIRMAN (PROF. P.J. KURIAN): Now, Shri Prasanta Chatterjee. You have eight minutes.

SHRI PRASANTA CHATTERJEE (WEST BENGAL): Sir, this is a very important Bill for the life of Delhi. This Bill -- The Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Bill, 2006 -- provides for a temporary relief to the people of Delhi against such action for a period of one year within which, this has been advocated, various policy issues will be formulated.

At the very outset, I would like to mention it here that it has not happened all of a sudden in Delhi; this chaos has not happened within a few years. Now the problem has taken a very serious turn, and we all know that. I had the opportunity to discuss this issue in some of the Standing Committees and came to know how severe violations of the Master Plan by the very rich people, with the full knowledge of the officials, full knowledge of many of the policy-makers like the DDA and all, have taken place. This has taken place over the years. Who is responsible for that?

I know even Nursing Homes and Kindergarten Schools have come up on the DDA land at concessional prices, and they have completely violated the conditions set forth while allocating land for that specific purpose. I don't know what action has been taken against them. The matter has been discussed with the Committees. They said that they would provide free treatment, which they have not provided. They said that they would provide free education, which they have not provided. I would like to mention only a few violations here.

Sir, it would have been better if this Bill could have come here after discussion in the Standing Committee. But I would like to emphasise the problem of urban life here. Even after 58-59 years of Independence, there is a continuous influx of rural population in the urban areas. It is for job, for shelter, and for livelihood, and this is a continuous process. They find places in Jhuggis and Jhopris. Who is responsible for this? Some of them are staying near canals, and some are staying adjacent to railway tracks on the Government land. You will all agree with me that the present socio-economic condition is responsible for that. (Contd. by VKK/2J)

-YSR/VKK/2j/3.55

SHRI PRASANTA CHATTERJEE (CONTD.): There is a huge section of the people who violated the master plan, moneyed people, and there is a huge section of the people, the shelter-less people, who are staying as encroachers on the land. Poor people stay in slums. So, while protecting the livelihood and protecting the rights of the people, we must not forget these vulnerable sections of our people; and without improving their lot, the nation cannot progress. I know, Sir, I had the opportunity to serve the Municipal Corporation for many years. Even, Sir, in Kolkata, which is a metropolitan city, I know when I was running the State administration, Zamindars had every right, the slum people had no right, either stayed in bad condition or faced demolition. That was the situation at that time. Now, the Government of West Bengal has changed that scenario. I would like to mention it here at the present day, the infant mortality rate of Kolkata, as a whole, is higher than that of the infant mortality rate in the slum areas of Kolkata. It has changed a lot because the scenario of the entire slum population has changed a lot after the Left has taken over. It is not only a health problem, but it is a socio-economic problem. So, Sir, the urban life has a nexus with the slum life. The urban life cannot be protected by neglecting the slum population and without improving the slum conditions. Without improving the civic amenities there, you cannot improve the health care.

Sir, in the present Bill, I would like to emphasise that in the case of encroachers, comprising the shelter-less people, the Government should arrange alternative accommodation when they take over those lands for their purpose of any activities. This is very, very important, Sir, because this has taken place. This side has done this; that side has done this; we had our problems. So, they should be guaranteed; they should be protected. Then, Sir, there are some unauthorised shops in the residential areas whose activities are regularly linked with residential areas. But there are others, business and economic activities in the residential areas, which are not regularly related with the life of the people in those residential areas. We should make a difference on that. Some of the commercial activities which are directly linked with the residential area, with the population of the residential area, we may regularise them. But those economic activities which are not directly linked with the residential areas, but have come up over the years in the residential areas, why should we protect them? Why should the serious violators of the master plan, over the years, be protected?

Sir, this is a very important Bill and I think that the views of the Standing Committee will have to be taken into account. I support it with the observation that after a long time, this Bill has come up. This should have come up earlier. With these words, I support this Bill. These are my views on this Bill. Thank you, Sir. (Ends)

(Followed by ASC/2k)

PREVIOUS HOUR